Gee, that sounds kinda familiar, eh?!

Yes, that was his 3rd contract.

Wilson will hit Rodgers' age when Rodgers' signed that MASSIVE extension when his FIRST extension (he just signed) runs out. Odds are, before the 2018 seasons, Wilson will sign his SECOND extension and I think it'll be along the lines of 5/130/90 that will tack on to his current deal that runs through 2019.

You see how this works?

I don't think we can make that determination.

I'm not sure what the Seahawk's ultimate plan is, but every contract extension they've completed with big name guys since their Super Bowl win has been for 4 years.

Earl Thomas, Richard Sherman, Michael Bennett, Kam Chancellor, Russell Wilson. All of those guys are either elite or close to it and none got more than 4 years on an extension.

OMG ALL QB'S SIGN EXTENSIONS AND DON'T HAVE THEIR DEALS TORN UP!?!?!? OMG! BREAKING NEWS!

You can't reneg on your rookie deal anymore.

I'm guessing that's why you're catching $3it...

Oh FFS :facepalm:

Rausch is an idiot that doesn't know anything about football...

I don't ****ing understand?

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE IN WHICH CONTRACT IT IS?

are you saying Wilson should have gotten more than Aaron Rodgers because he's younger? His SECOND contract is set to expire in time for him to get ANOTHER massive contract, you know, right around the same age as Aaron's THIRD contract?

WHAT THE **** ARE YOU ****ING IDIOTS TRYING TO ARGUE?

OMFG

YOU GUYS ARE ****ING STUPID

There are very strict limits on rookie deals...

Haha hootie. Clearly, when you said 5/120, you were including next year's 1.5 million in that figure. You thought the extension part would be 4 years for 118.5 million. Obviously you meant he would make $29,625,000 per year. It was a strangely specific number to predict, though.

my head is going to explode ... between watching the Blue Jays just ****ing rack up hit, after hit, after hit, after hit and then arguing with these dipshits about the Wilson extension, you know, where he was paid like Aaron Rodgers but somehow since it was his first extension instead of his second extension there is a difference because well, I have no idea

...I want to punch something

My question: did he say he had a source or inside info?

Was this just a guess on his part?

If it was I don't see the point...

my post was (that I forgot I had even made) this:

"I don't see how Russell won't get 5/110 with 80 guaranteed."

So, honestly, I was dead wrong. To the tune of 1 year. Moron, I am.

because, if you break it down, 110/5 = 22. 88/4 = 22.

somehow though, since I was so close to being right, Dane decided he was going to add in Russell's current final year on his rookie deal to make it look like he was making Alex Smith money instead of Aaron Rodgers money while ignoring the fact both Alex Smith and Aaron Rodgers signed extensions on their 2nd deals as well (Rodgers 5 year extension was 5/110/63 but added on to his existing 2 year contract turning his 22 in new money to around 17.5 if you add the 2 existing years like he wanted to do with Russell)

So he was arguing Wilson using the last year of his rookie deal while comparing it to NEW MONEY ONLY on Rodgers/Smith extensions while ignoring the extension part of their deals.

It was totally ridiculous ... and somehow people are still trying to call me the moron.

No. Dane made some ridiculous prediction. Hootie predicted he'd re-sign for 5/120. Hootie was correct about the fact that he re-signed and correct about the $ per year. Wilson got the exact same deal, only it was for 4 years instead of 5...therefore Dane tried to declare victory even though he keeps making predictions about young star QBs being traded or not resigned.

It makes no sense. Hootie was really, really close. Dane was laughably wrong...again.