ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs looking into Laviska Shenault (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=343125)

BigCatDaddy 04-01-2022 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 16227392)
Exactly. He's coming off his rookie contract, seeing what Adams and Hill just got for contracts. He's going to want something very similar. He's not going to want any short term deal, he's gonna want his payday. The Chiefs would be putting themselves right back into the position they just got out of with Hill.

How about extending him at the time of the trade?

The Franchise 04-01-2022 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 16227413)
How about extending him at the time of the trade?

Then you’ve killed any value you had by trading Hill.

Fish 04-01-2022 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 16227413)
How about extending him at the time of the trade?

Well yeah, that's what I meant. He's not going to want to go somewhere without knowing that team will step up for an extension. Probably the same way Hill did with Miami. He wouldn't agree without that extension guarantee. My point was if we went after DK, we're not going to get him on a short term "Prove it" contract.

htismaqe 04-01-2022 10:50 AM

We're not getting Metcalf. Just stop already.

Rausch 04-01-2022 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 16227495)
We're not getting Metcalf. Just stop already.

There's every reason to believe his contract will be bigger than Hill's.

Every top WR was drafted. We've got a ton of picks. Use them smart and we'll have our own no 1 WR...

htismaqe 04-01-2022 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 16227513)
There's every reason to believe his contract will be bigger than Hill's.

Every top WR was drafted. We've got a ton of picks. Use them smart and we'll have our own no 1 WR...

Exactly.

The Franchise 04-01-2022 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 16227513)
There's every reason to believe his contract will be bigger than Hill's.

Every top WR was drafted. We've got a ton of picks. Use them smart and we'll have our own no 1 WR...

Nope...the obvious thing to do is completely blow any value we created with the Hill trade.

htismaqe 04-01-2022 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16227522)
Nope...the obvious thing to do is completely blow any value we created with the Hill trade.

JAMESON!

The Franchise 04-01-2022 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 16227524)
JAMESON!

I'll be happy when I never have to hear Jameson Williams or DK Metcalf and the Chiefs in the same sentence ever again.

htismaqe 04-01-2022 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16227526)
I'll be happy when I never have to hear Jameson Williams or DK Metcalf and the Chiefs in the same sentence ever again.

:thumb::clap:

chiefforlife 04-01-2022 11:10 AM

What if?

Lets say they pull off a trade for DK. They immediately sign him to a new contract for roughly 20 million a year with a low cap hit this year.

We are paying him top WR money for his past production but not THE top, he gets his money sooner and gets Patrick. This helps him out as well as the Chiefs.

Then if he blows up which is likely, hes already under contract for 4 years?

Win Win!

TwistedChief 04-01-2022 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefforlife (Post 16227541)
What if?

Lets say they pull off a trade for DK. They immediately sign him to a new contract for roughly 20 million a year with a low cap hit this year.

We are paying him top WR money for his past production but not THE top, he gets his money sooner and gets Patrick. This helps him out as well as the Chiefs.

Then if he blows up which is likely, hes already under contract for 4 years?

Win Win!

I would argue that signing any player in the NFL below their actual worth would be win-win. It's almost a question of why said player would accept a deal like that...

Answer: If Christian Kirk is getting 18mm/yr, Metcalf is getting a lot more than 20mm/yr.

The Franchise 04-01-2022 11:16 AM

There's to much DK Metcalf bullshit in this thread about Shenault, god damnt.

chiefforlife 04-01-2022 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16227551)
I would argue that signing any player in the NFL below their actual worth would be win-win. It's almost a question of why said player would accept a deal like that...

Answer: If Christian Kirk is getting 18mm/yr, Metcalf is getting a lot more than 20mm/yr.

Fair question, possible answers...

He isnt going to get a new contract this year from the Seahawks, he could be tagged next year so still no new contract.

He has no QB in Seattle, hard to build your brand over the next two years with no QB.

He gets his money NOW instead of a maybe in the next year or two. He goes to a much better team with the BEST QB in the league.

He then gets another contract at 29 after winning a few Superbowls!

Dante84 04-01-2022 11:36 AM

Let's just go ahead and draft the next DK instead, and pay him a rookie salary for the next 4 years.

Even if we have to trade up slightly, it still would cost less than shipping picks to Seattle.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.