ChiefsPlanet - KU **** OFFICIAL 2015-2016 Kansas Basketball Repository Thread ****

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

**** OFFICIAL 2015-2016 Kansas Basketball Repository Thread **** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=291487)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 12000733)

ESPN's Jeff Goodman talking about "controversy" of Frank Mason being not 3 feet away. Also mentioned that they had to call the foul on the over the back. What about the foul on Mason that should have been called but wasn't prior to the over the back, you ****tard?

Lol what? Where in the hell did Goodman get that from? There's no rule that says you have to give any room. **** ESPN. Learn the damn rules. Call themselves "journalists" LMAO

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 12000600)

:spock:

My understanding is you can't cross the plane.

http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/...0wfn4izv02.jpg

Anyone have a way to catalog @FauxPelini's twitter feed from last night?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 12000952)

http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/...0wfn4izv02.jpg

I thought he looked awful damn close. However, it looked to me like when he swatted the ball he was lunging forward, so it wouldn't surprise me if that was after Hield had already tried to inbound the ball.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 12000952)

http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/...0wfn4izv02.jpg

That was after the ball was thrown into play.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 12000960)

That was after the ball was thrown into play.

I'm not griping in the least. Great game. Bad officiating. One went right for us at the right moment.

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12000611)

Iirc, it's supposed to be 3 feet

I just looked it up. There is no mention in the rule book of a requirement to give the passer 3 feet. It does say that the inbound passer has an area that is 3 feet wide. That could be what you're thinking of.

Quote:

Section 5. Throw-in—Point of Interruption

Section 6. Throw-in — Requirements
Art. 1. A throw-in is the method of putting the ball in play from out of bounds.

Art. 2. A thrower-in is the player attempting the throw-in.

Art. 3. The throw-in shall start and the throw-in team shall have team
control when the ball is at the disposal of a player entitled to the throw-in.

Art. 4. A throw-in and the throw-in count shall begin when the ball is at the
disposal of the player entitled to the throw-in.

Art. 5. A throw-in shall end when a passed ball legally touches an inbounds
player or when a player, who is located on the playing court, touches and
causes the ball to be out of bounds or when the throw-in team commits a
throw-in violation.

Art. 6. The thrower-in shall release the ball no more than five seconds after
the throw-in count begins. The pass shall go directly into the playing court,
except as provided in Rule 7-4.6.b.

Art. 7. The throw-in count shall end when the ball is released by the
thrower-in so that the ball goes directly onto the playing court.

Art. 8. The following pertain to a designated spot:
a The designated spot is the location at which a thrower-in is presented
disposal of the ball out of bounds as in 4-11.1.a through .c.
b. The designated spot shall be 3-feet wide with no depth limitation.
c. The thrower-in must keep one foot on or over the designated spot until
the ball is released. Pivot foot restrictions and the traveling rule are not
in effect for a throw-in.
d. The thrower-in shall not leave the designated spot until he has released the
ball and the thrown-in ball crosses the plane of the sideline or end line.

Art. 9. Until the throw-in ball crosses the plane of the sideline or end line:
a. The thrower-in may not touch the ball until it touches another
player inbounds.
b. No opponent of the thrower-in shall have any part of his person over
the inside plane of the boundary line.
c. Teammates shall not line up next to each other within 6 feet of a
boundary line and parallel to it when an opponent desires a spot
between the positions.
d. Teammates may occupy adjacent positions near a boundary line when
the teammates take adjacent positions that are perpendicular to the
boundary line.

Art. 10. When the ball is located out of bounds, the thrower-in may pass the
ball into the backcourt.

Art. 11. During any throw-in, the throw-in team may cause the ball to go
into the backcourt, regardless of where the throw-in spot is located.

Art. 12. After the throw-in ends, an inbounds player in the frontcourt who is
not in control of the ball may cause the ball to go into the backcourt.

Art. 13. When the ball is awarded to the wrong team, the error must be
rectified before the throw-in ends.

http://www.ncaapublications.com/p-43...retations.aspx

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 12000967)

I'm not griping in the least. Great game. Bad officiating. One went right for us at the right moment.

Yeah, the whole game was a series of bad calls going both ways. Does seem silly to focus on one call at the end considering that (especially when it is pretty unclear whether it was even a bad one).

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 12000846)

It wasn't quite as bad as a Big 12 road game (just wait for Huggins' WVU hacking on every possession next week while getting away with it), but it certainly didn't feel like we were playing at home with some of those calls. Still hard to believe that foul on the clean Mason strip of the ball to end the 1st half. Total anticipation call.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 12000974)

Yeah, the whole game was a series of bad calls going both ways. Seems does seem silly to focus on one call at the end considering that (especially when it is pretty unclear whether it was even a bad one).

The first half was pretty slanted towards OU. It's pretty hard for me to believe that the fouls were 12 against the 3 ball shooting team, and 5 against the team that wants to work the low post.

I got those numbers from here, so I don't know if they are right. What I do remember is they were in the DOUBLE BONUS with 8:00 left in the FIRST HALF. We never got to the double bonus. Those early fouls sidelined Selden, who has been awesome for like 10 minutes. It may have evened out in the second half, but it damn sure doesn't if Self doesn't get the T.

That was the the best game I've seen since the NCAA tourney KSU/XU in 2009 in SLC.

But the best conference game I've seen in... Forever.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 12000738)

I watched.

It was okay.

Great perimeter defense. Give up 73 points to two guys.

Even with your normally bad takes on basketball, you've been in ultra troll mode lately. ROFL

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 12000981)

Oklahoma does a good job of not fouling on defense, but not that good a job. We certainly did not get our usual AFH benefit overall.

These two teams will meet in the NCAA title game.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 12000985)

That was the the best game I've seen since the NCAA tourney KSU/XU in 2009 in SLC.

But the best conference game I've seen in... Forever.

IMO, this isnt as good as KU coming back and beating MU at AFH coming back from down like 20, forcing it to OT and then going on to win.

Imagine how much greater that game could have been with good officiating.