There aren't 11 better teams.

Sadly, not really... if the winner of the Big 10 actually gets a 2 seed, Kansas should be a 2 or a 1. And I'm sure UNC fans feel like it was a down year and they're predicted as a 2 seed. And HTF is Cincinnati a 3, besides winning their dumb conference?!

I don't think they should be a 1 seed, but definitely a 2 compared to the field.

UVA, Sparty, Xavier, Nova, Duke, Purdont, Cincy, Wichita St., Auburn, Michigan, Zona, St. Mary's

Oh man. LMAO

Puff, puff, pass. :Pimp:

Meh. Oklahoma State was playing for a bid and KU was playing to play. Uninterested from the start. You won’t get the same intensity and energy until March 15 or 16. Pray nobody gets hurt during the conference tournament if we win a game or two. Hate these things.

A few are better, but most are on the same level. It's doing the hard math to set them apart. It can't be argued that they are a top fifteen team in the nation. And have a very good argument for a three line. Which they probably get being a blueblood. Luckily this'll all be settled in the next week

You're a giant idiot

This is true.

You obviously don’t know how the committee seeds. By their resume they’re a 1/2.

Do you back up your claims, or do you just make them?

Does anyone really know? I've heard that strength of schedule and road wins are huge. But every year a few teams get screwed on either seeding or tourney entry and it seems to be a mystery as to why exactly

Yeah, it's not exactly difficult to predict seeding in the NCAA, particularly the high seeds. They follow pretty strictly to a formula.

KU is likely going to be a #2 seed and possibly a #1 depending on how they/Duke/UNC/Xavier do next week entirely because of their amount of quality wins.

They’ll be a 2 for sure

Could be a 1 if they win the big 12 tourney

OSU to cover was easy money.