![]() |
Quote:
He DID improve over the three games in question. He was flat out bad against Cleveland, regardless of what people try to say. By Pittsburgh he was probably above average. I wouldn't say 'good' but he did get better every week. That's worth something. |
Quote:
|
Honestly, I'm just glad the 2s got a full game of reps to see what they do/don't have.
|
Humphries gives us a high ceiling, so I'd prefer they at least give it a shot, but if he's struggling early just go back to Thuney :shrug:
|
Quote:
Baltimore and Buffalo are both less talented than last year. We won't play either one in the divisional. You really think Denver and the Chargers are within 7 pts of this team in the playoffs? No... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's just made up from whole cloth. Really stupid. Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm not sure which of those points you think is arguable. Buffalo's D is complete bottom 10 ass. Raven's D is unbelievably weak vs the pass and rely on the pass rush to get home. Flowers is hurt and may not even play next week. |
Quote:
Lost to the Bills Beat Denver by a blocked FG Beat the Chargers by 2 then 7 I like the Chiefs but not sure what you’re watching to say the games won’t be close |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's gonna be Thuney. Humphries was ASS in the second half today. Looked absolutely gassed. What's really stupid is your take that we're gonna start him at left tackle after 1 decent half of football all season. Put the f'n crack pipe down |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Because that’s what I’m disputing despite believing we’ll win them all |
If he’s the starter. I think he needs to get in a high humidity setting and run some sprints with Watson the next two weeks. His conditioning is off and most of the bad play was in the second half because of it .
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.