ChiefsPlanet
Page 16 of 20 « First 612131415 16 17181920
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Bradford Please (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=199979)

OnTheWarpath15 01-10-2009 11:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 5375196)
Really? Read through the whole thread, and read through past threads. People highly exaggerate his weaknesses, anyone that says they like him is attacked, people make fun of the way he looks, etc.

The rational discussions on him are few and far between.



Read above. People on here also claim he has a noodle arm, does bubble screens all day, shit on him for the spread even though OU runs more of a pro-style spread than what Tech or Mizzou runs. The arguments against him are fair on the surface, but the exaggerations are just hysterically ridiculous.



So who's viewpoint would you "fawn" over? Not Kiper or McShay. Mayock? Or would you pull this argument out on anyone who favored Bradford?



Sorry if I don't listen to Herbstreit and Corso for draft analysis.


Well, that clears it up.

Thin skin.

I wish I had the time to look, but I'd be willing to be that of all the guys that think Bradford is the #1 QB of the 3, that 95%+ of them are OU fans.

Trust me, I HOPE Bradford goes #1.

That all but hands us Stafford or Sanchez if the new GM wants them.

the Talking Can 01-10-2009 11:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 5375196)
Really? Read through the whole thread, and read through past threads. People highly exaggerate his weaknesses, anyone that says they like him is attacked, people make fun of the way he looks, etc.

The rational discussions on him are few and far between.



Read above. People on here also claim he has a noodle arm, does bubble screens all day, shit on him for the spread even though OU runs more of a pro-style spread than what Tech or Mizzou runs. The arguments against him are fair on the surface, but the exaggerations are just hysterically ridiculous.



So who's viewpoint would you "fawn" over? Not Kiper or McShay. Mayock? Or would you pull this argument out on anyone who favored Bradford?



Sorry if I don't listen to Herbstreit and Corso for draft analysis.
other than mecca and hamas, who are you crying about?

milkman 01-10-2009 11:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5375203)
Well, that clears it up.

Thin skin.

I wish I had the time to look, but I'd be willing to be that of all the guys that think Bradford is the #1 QB of the 3, that 95%+ of them are OU fans.

Trust me, I HOPE Bradford goes #1.

That all but hands us Stafford or Sanchez if the new GM wants them.
I haven't heard.

Has Sanchez announced a decision yet?

OnTheWarpath15 01-10-2009 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5375206)
I haven't heard.

Has Sanchez announced a decision yet?
Nope.

If I'm him, I take right up until the deadline.

Tribal Warfare 01-10-2009 11:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5375203)
Well, that clears it up.

Thin skin.

I wish I had the time to look, but I'd be willing to be that of all the guys that think Bradford is the #1 QB of the 3, that 95%+ of them are OU fans.

Trust me, I HOPE Bradford goes #1.

That all but hands us Stafford or Sanchez if the new GM wants them.
Honestly, I don't think he'll declare after watching the National Championship and not winning it.

OnTheWarpath15 01-10-2009 11:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 5375211)
Honestly, I don't think he'll declare after watching the National Championship and not winning it.
He'd be screwing himself, IMO.

He'll be leaving some serious money on the table if he does. OU is losing a lot on offense, and he's not going to repeat these video game stats without that OL. Not to mention the risk of injury.

If the NFL tells you you're a Top 15 pick, and you pass, then you're insane.

That's exactly why Maclin broke down repeatedly during his presser yesterday. You could tell he wanted to come back, but knew that he'd be risking his future if he did.

Tribal Warfare 01-10-2009 11:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5375219)
He'd be screwing himself, IMO.

He'll be leaving some serious money on the table if he does. OU is losing a lot on offense, and he's not going to repeat these video game stats without that OL. Not to mention the risk of injury.

If the NFL tells you you're a Top 15 pick, and you pass, then you're insane.

That's exactly why Maclin broke down repeatedly during his presser yesterday. You could tell he wanted to come back, but knew that he'd be risking his future if he did.
It's also playing the odds if Sanchez comes up, odds are next year he'll be 1st QB selected in the top 3 or 5

Brock 01-10-2009 11:46 AM
You don't want to end up like Brohm.

OnTheWarpath15 01-10-2009 11:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5375239)
You don't want to end up like Brohm.
THIS.

eazyb81 01-10-2009 12:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5375202)
"Oklahoma’s offense has kept him from facing much pass-rush pressure. "


um, this is exactly what this board has been saying forever....and now it is confirmed....

what's really funny is that there are people on this board who believe that Aikman was only a "game manager" and not a franchise QB...I wonder if any of those idiots are Bradford fans?
WTF are you babbling about with that last point?

The other part is that he's a "no brainer" #1 pick, yet the majority of this board acts like he's not even a 1st round pick this year. There's a disconnect here, and I'm pointing it out. Just like there was a disconnect last year when 99% of this board acted like Ryan would be the worst pick ever, and they were completely wrong.

eazyb81 01-10-2009 12:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5375203)
Well, that clears it up.

Thin skin.

I wish I had the time to look, but I'd be willing to be that of all the guys that think Bradford is the #1 QB of the 3, that 95%+ of them are OU fans.

Trust me, I HOPE Bradford goes #1.

That all but hands us Stafford or Sanchez if the new GM wants them.
Yeah, you surely don't have time to look it up, considering you're on here 24 hours a day. :rolleyes:

Who cares about the ranking of the three players; I'm talking about acknowledging that Bradford is a solid pro prospect. The majority on this board are simply incapable of giving him his due props.

milkman 01-10-2009 12:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 5375292)
Yeah, you surely don't have time to look it up, considering you're on here 24 hours a day. :rolleyes:

Who cares about the ranking of the three players; I'm talking about acknowledging that Bradford is a solid pro prospect. The majority on this board are simply incapable of giving him his due props.
Majority?

Embellish much?

OnTheWarpath15 01-10-2009 12:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 5375284)
WTF are you babbling about with that last point?

The other part is that he's a "no brainer" #1 pick,
In who's opinion? This ONE scout you reference? There's a combination of 4-5 guys that could end up being the 1st pick, and a lot of mocks reflect that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 5375284)
yet the majority of this board acts like he's not even a 1st round pick this year.
Wow, talk about exaggeration. I've yet to see ANYONE who SERIOUSLY thinks the guy isn't a 1st round pick.

eazyb81 01-10-2009 12:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5375297)
Majority?

Embellish much?
Seriously?

You don't think more than 50% of the people into the draft on this board exaggerate Bradford's weaknesses? Just go through this thread again if you don't believe me.

OnTheWarpath15 01-10-2009 12:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 5375292)
Yeah, you surely don't have time to look it up, considering you're on here 24 hours a day. :rolleyes:

Who cares about the ranking of the three players; I'm talking about acknowledging that Bradford is a solid pro prospect. The majority on this board are simply incapable of giving him his due props.
You never go full reerun.

Read THIS thread.

If you're smart enough to be able to sort through the guys that are making comments to get under the skin of the OU fans, and the guys that actually know a few things about football and the draft, you'd see that people ARE giving him props.

But they are also pointing out his shortcomings, just like they have with Stafford (decision making and inconsistency) and Sanchez. (only 1 full year as a starter)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:22 PM.
Page 16 of 20 « First 612131415 16 17181920
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.