ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Clean Slate With The Draftubators (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=216265)

Tiger's Fan 10-15-2009 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6173895)
You're ****ing stupid.

Seriously, ****ING STUPID.

The words "sucked", "terrible" or any other extremely negative connotations were NOT used to describe Hali's play.

I factually pointed out that he was a bad draft pick, considering a half a dozen Pro Bowlers went behind him, that he's struggled along with the rest of the linebacking corp and that Carl chose him because of his relationship with LJ's father, Hali's position coach.

You proved NOTHING.

Expect that you're a hateful, spiteful, stupid, naive mother****er.

Denial based on semantics is still just denial.

DaneMcCloud 10-15-2009 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buster Hymen (Post 6173901)
Denial based on semantics is still just denial.

I'm done with you.

You're truly are a ****ing idiot.

Have fun with that.

Tiger's Fan 10-15-2009 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6173939)
I'm done with you.

You're truly are a ****ing idiot.

Have fun with that.

Congrats on looking like your usual self yet again today.

I'm sure we'll be seeing you being yourself again tomorrow.

philfree 10-15-2009 12:12 PM

Well that thread went well. :D

PhilFree:arrow:

Chiefnj2 10-15-2009 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by salame (Post 6173872)
drafturbators?

A group of guys who every year get behind a certain player (last year Sanchez, year before Gholston) and basically refuse to discuss any other potential draft pick except to say someone is an idiot for mentioning the other player, or they don't understand draft value, or they are afraid to build a team the right way, or they are happy going 8-8. There is also a certain level of inconsistency and hypocrisy in their positions that they refuse to recognize.

DaneMcCloud 10-15-2009 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buster Hymen (Post 6173951)
Congrats on looking like your usual self yet again today.

I'm sure we'll be seeing you being yourself again tomorrow.

Look, Asshole: You "proved" nothing.

Even YOU can't point out where I supposedly "lied".

You're just another dumb**** that think they matter.

You don't. You're absolutely irrelevant.

DaneMcCloud 10-15-2009 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6173959)
A group of guys who every year get behind a certain player (last year Sanchez, year before Gholston) and basically refuse to discuss any other potential draft pick except to say someone is an idiot for mentioning the other player, or they don't understand draft value, or they are afraid to build a team the right way, or they are happy going 8-8. There is also a certain level of inconsistency and hypocrisy in their positions that they refuse to recognize.

Would you put yourself in that category?

Just an honest question, not an indictment.

BigCatDaddy 10-15-2009 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6173959)
A group of guys who every year get behind a certain player (last year Sanchez, year before Gholston) and basically refuse to discuss any other potential draft pick except to say someone is an idiot for mentioning the other player, or they don't understand draft value, or they are afraid to build a team the right way, or they are happy going 8-8. There is also a certain level of inconsistency and hypocrisy in their positions that they refuse to recognize.

Is Taylor Mays this years choice? Dane?........Mecca?.......Hamas?

Brock 10-15-2009 12:36 PM

I'd guess Eric Berry.

L.A. Chieffan 10-15-2009 12:37 PM

we all know who mecca is going to want

DaneMcCloud 10-15-2009 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 6174019)
Is Taylor Mays this years choice? Dane?........Mecca?.......Hamas?

I like Berry better than Mays.

Others will certainly disagree.

Either would be a fine choice, if those two players are the only choice.

Chiefnj2 10-15-2009 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6173973)
Would you put yourself in that category?

Just an honest question, not an indictment.

I didn't want Gholston. I tried to bring up his inconsistency in college and was told I was a reerun, which may be true - but for other reasons. I didn't want Sanchez because I thought it was pretty clear that Pioli was going to go with Cassel come hell or highwater.

I would have drafted Curry. I understood why some people wanted Smith or Monroe.

I gave KC a draft grade of C-. I didn't like ignoring the OL and thought rounds 3-7 were pretty bad. I can rationalize the Jackson pick now that I see Pioli wanted to move into a 3-4 immediately rather than transition slowly through a 43 under. I still think Curry's a better LB than Jackson a 34 DE. I would have went with OL and pass rushers for most of the 2nd day of the draft.

DeezNutz 10-15-2009 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6174048)
I would have drafted Curry.

Oops, here's another ****ing idiot who doesn't understand positional value.

Pablo 10-15-2009 12:51 PM

Haha. This thread is hilarious. How can anyone get this angry over a football message board? Dane, you need to take a break before you stroke out.

Srsly. Take a chill pill, brah.

Simply Red 10-15-2009 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 6173958)
Well that thread went well. :D

PhilFree:arrow:

ROFL love 'dem internetz fightz. I won't do it anymore.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.