ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs listing McCluster as a WR (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227117)

KCrockaholic 04-23-2010 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 6707927)
LMAO

Truefturbator?!

Oh Damn. A new word....

notorious 04-23-2010 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 6707931)
I know I'll get blasted for this but I have more faith in Mays than DJ...

You would be amazed at how many people agree.


DJ ****ing wiffs on too many tackles and is out of position all the time.


Mays strengths are DJ's weaknesses and vice-versa.

MoreLemonPledge 04-23-2010 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6707933)
Of course there can. You're missing the point.

You guys are acting as if he was the BPA. He wasn't.

Or that we don't have Jamaal Charles. We do.

Or that we have solid starters on the front seven, specifically at LB. We don't.

So, while I love Jamaal Charles, I think it's an incredible waste of resources to take his smaller clone in a draft where there are impact players at positions of desperate need staring you in the face at each pick.

So what are you projecting McCluster to do in his rookie season? I'll make a bet and take the over.

notorious 04-23-2010 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6707934)
Oh Damn. A new word....

Nah, certainly someone can do better than that.

OnTheWarpath15 04-23-2010 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MoreLemonPledge (Post 6707921)
I bet the Vikings are really kicking themselves for taking a converted RB and making him a WR.

The Vikings didn't have gaping holes on their roster, did they?

They could afford a luxury pick.

And comparing McCluster to Harvin as a WR in college is just absurd.

MoreLemonPledge 04-23-2010 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 6707939)
Nah, certainly someone can do better than that.

I'll go with fluffer. No reason, really. I just like that word.

Mr. Flopnuts 04-23-2010 11:53 PM

When the defense is getting gashed by Jerome Harrison type players next year at least you'll be happy grandpa's offense is back. Minus the mid tier quarterback of course.

Hey we lost, but we scored 40! That's improvement!

keg in kc 04-23-2010 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 6707931)
I know I'll get blasted for this but I have more faith in Mays than DJ...

I don't think I'd disagree at this point. I wasn't one of the people clamoring for DJ to be on the field last year. He was on the bench for a reason. All the talent in the world doesn't mean a thing if you're missing all your assignments.

OnTheWarpath15 04-23-2010 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6707945)
When the defense is getting gashed by Jerome Harrison type players next year at least you'll be happy grandpa's offense is back. Minus the mid tier quarterback of course.

Hey we lost, but we scored 40! That's improvement!

Seriously.

MoreLemonPledge 04-23-2010 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6707945)
When the defense is getting gashed by Jerome Harrison type players next year at least you'll be happy grandpa's offense is back. Minus the mid tier quarterback of course.

Hey we lost, but we scored 40! That's improvement!

So do you not agree that Crennel is better than whatever shit we had at DC last year? You don't think that's an improvement in itself?

the Talking Can 04-23-2010 11:55 PM

our lb core is pretty much all ass

DaneMcCloud 04-23-2010 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6707933)
Of course there can. You're missing the point.

You guys are acting as if he was the BPA. He wasn't.

Or that we don't have Jamaal Charles. We do.

Or that we have solid starters on the front seven, specifically at LB. We don't.

So, while I love Jamaal Charles, I think it's an incredible waste of resources to take his smaller clone in a draft where there are impact players at positions of desperate need staring you in the face at each pick.

I think that's debatable. We've all heard about Philly and Kiper had him in his Top Ten when the Chiefs chose.

Again, I expected them to shore up the middle of the defense but they chose to go with an offensive playmaker. I couldn't give a shit about 10 spots IF they get a playmaker.

And for whatever reason, they didn't think the defensive player was the right choice. Time will tell if they're right or wrong but I can't find them "wrong" for choosing a proven leader and playmaker.

notorious 04-23-2010 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6707945)
When the defense is getting gashed by Jerome Harrison type players next year at least you'll be happy grandpa's offense is back. Minus the mid tier quarterback of course.

Hey we lost, but we scored 40! That's improvement!

Back to Vermeil's teams.


Give me a shotgun and I will paint you a pretty, red picture.

Mr. Flopnuts 04-23-2010 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6707950)
Seriously.

I'm just glad we have Eric Berry to limit them to 8 yard runs instead of 18.

L.A. Chieffan 04-23-2010 11:56 PM

theres no way this offense would be as good as vermeils, now youre just pulling my chain TRUE FAN


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.