![]() |
Yep, we need an OT or ILB with the first overall pick.
|
Any player could bust. It doesn't matter what spot you take him. The whole draft is a freaking crap shoot. Just take your highest QB on your board at #1. What have we got to lose?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We're a ways off from the Combine, so we'll know more after it's completed, but I just don't want them to reach. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The QB whom we select here will be more talented than any QB whom we could get via trade or FA, so I see it as a no-brainer. |
Quote:
Quote:
The bottom line for me is that I'd hate to see the Chiefs take a QB because they NEED a QB, then end up with Jake Locker or Blaine Gabbert. That, to me, would suck and further set back the franchise. |
One thing to consider is whoever gets drafted in this spot will command a $50+ million dollar deal over seven years. It's not a spot to just take a guy that doesn't fit the system, especially a QB. You are looking for a difference-maker at any position and Reid will take the best player on the board at QB, OT, LB, DT, or DB in that order if and only if 1) he is worthy of a franchise player status, 2) he can't find a trade partner willing to trade down for multiple picks.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Set the franchise back from what? End up with ANOTHER 1st overall pick? |
Quote:
All I know is that year after year, teams "Fall In Love" with certain players, so I find it a bit difficult to suggest that "no team" would be willing to move up in the draft. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There is nothing but mediocrity available via trade or FA, so we have to take the chance on someone with legit upside, and who is every bit the equal of the FA/trade lot. New CBA makes it easy to turn and burn if a more appealing option appears, even if that's next off-season. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.