ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Now Who is the #1 Pick??? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270714)

RyFo18 03-04-2013 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 9464384)
Especially one with no pass rush. Tyson Jackson all over again.

How so?

Frankie 03-04-2013 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9464376)
One track thinking?

I've entertained all options in this thread, stating repeatedly that all options are on the table. God damn you are dumb.

You're the idiot who thinks that a PLAYER has any say at all on who the team will draft. And it's been reported that Alex didn't even know he was being traded until the story broke.....so much for that idea, eh?

:facepalm:

You didn't read my post and replied. Par for the course.

ToxSocks 03-04-2013 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9464383)
Hey Detox! I get to be Lloyd Christmas.

ROFL

Dayze 03-04-2013 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shox (Post 9464392)
Not really...but I think it is the most likely thing to happen.

We just jumped on the Alex Smith bankwagon. We better get a stud D built very, very quickly.

Star, Poe, Jackson
Houston, Johnson, ???, Tamba
Flowers, FA CB, Berry FA S

Has the making of a very, very good D.

but, defense no longer wins Championships.

it just prolongs the inevitable.

Shox 03-04-2013 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9464398)
but, defense no longer wins Championships.

it just prolongs the inevitable.

I'm just calling it like I see it. If I were running the show we would not be trading a 2nd round pick for Alex Smith.

Shox 03-04-2013 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9464398)
but, defense no longer wins Championships.

it just prolongs the inevitable.

I don't agree with this either.

San Fran and Baltimore have pretty damn good defenses.

Dayze 03-04-2013 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shox (Post 9464406)
I'm just calling it like I see it. If I were running the show we would not be trading a 2nd round pick for Alex Smith.

oh, I know. no big deal i know it's your opinion etc.
I understand that etc.

I just think the top 3 is a place where you spend wisely for players than can effect the outcome of a game on a single play etc.

Shox 03-04-2013 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9464415)
oh, I know. no big deal i know it's your opinion etc.
I understand that etc.

I just think the top 3 is a place where you spend wisely for players than can effect the outcome of a game on a single play etc.

I'm still hoping for Geno, but it is a dream IMO.

keg in kc 03-04-2013 05:12 PM

Jesus, people have gone from rationalizing the idiotic alex smith move to rationalizing starfish lollypop with the #1.

Wait, am I on the right board?

Internet Tough Guy 03-04-2013 05:14 PM

Why dont we trade back in the 1st and pick up picks, trade back again in the 1st pick up picks and then pick up barkley OR trade back again and pick up more picks and the pick up barkley? Only problem is i doubt barkley falls out of the top 10 ):

Gravedigger 03-04-2013 05:15 PM

Dee Milliner or trade down.

Shox 03-04-2013 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Makjuice (Post 9464445)
Why dont we trade back in the 1st and pick up picks, trade back again in the 1st pick up picks and then pick up barkley OR trade back again and pick up more picks and the pick up barkley? Only problem is i doubt barkley falls out of the top 10 ):

Barkley will be available in the top 10 of the 2nd round.

melbar 03-04-2013 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9464398)
but, defense no longer wins Championships.

it just prolongs the inevitable.

S.F. and Baltimore aren't exactly offensive juggernauts. They were built on Defense.

Internet Tough Guy 03-04-2013 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shox (Post 9464453)
Barkley will be available in the top 10 of the 2nd round.

Then we need to trade back and back and pick up barkley. why waiste a pick on geno when we could get a crap more picks and get barkley?

Shox 03-04-2013 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Makjuice (Post 9464457)
Then we need to trade back and back and pick up barkley. why waiste a pick on geno when we could get a crap more picks and get barkley?

Because Barkely SUCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

Give me Tebow over Barkely.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.