DJ's left nut |
05-28-2013 08:04 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeezNutz
(Post 9715468)
Absolutely. Many, many analysts crushed that decision. On some level, I understood it as a desperate attempt to acquire power by moving a commodity that's easily replaceable. Nevertheless, it was wrong.
DM formally stripped and showed his anus to KC in the summer of '09, however. After the trade for Betancourt, who was literally the worst everyday player in MLB, Moore had to do damage control across many radio platforms. In the process, he admitted that he didn't really understand defensive metrics.
As a diehard baseball fan, I'll always remember where I was when I heard that interview. It's my personal sports equivalent to 9/11. Shock, sadness, anger...
|
In his defense, I thought Betancourt presented an interesting offensive addition for a team that could get some guys on base around him.
You absolutely want patient hitters in your lineup, but a good lineup also has a few aggressive ones here and there. For instance, the Cardinals have Craig, who swings at everything, but by God, he's just outstanding at making contact and getting runners over/in. If you have a team full of those guys, your collective OBP blows and you lose. If you don't have any of them, you have guys trying to work counts instead of driving in runs. It's a balancing act.
Betancourt was a low-cost acquisition of a guy that would be a nice 7th/8th place hitter who could clean up the 5/6 hitters and re-set for the top of the order.
And your system had nothing at SS, so plugging him in at SS and hoping he'd stop getting fatter had some upside to it.
But yeah, if he was out there singing the praises of Betancourt as a defender...well that's just silly. "Disinterested" is giving him too much credit; he's the flat out laziest ****ing fielder I've ever seen.
|