ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Marcus Peters also had verbal altercation with assistant coach Sunday (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=312203)

DaneMcCloud 02-19-2018 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13425552)
Why are we giving La Canfora any credibility here?

We’re talking about the same guy that said we’re taking Okung minutes before we drafted Berry. It’s pretty obvious he is just running with Florio’s speculation that’s all centered around the corner additions.

Think about how little you have to actually know about the Chiefs to think adding Fuller and Amerson might mean we’re trading Peters?

There’s two ways to look at it, IMO.

1. Veach acquired Fuller and Amerson to strengthen the secondary.
2. Veach acquired Fuller and Amerson because his plan is to trade Peters.

I don’t know if you have a ton of family and friends in the KC area but everyone, including my freaking mom, who knows nothing about football, was disgusted by Peters actions in 2017.

I think it’s auite possible that it was worse behind the scenes than Andy led on.

pugsnotdrugs19 02-19-2018 04:57 PM

If they’re trading him because of political BS... then it’s stupid. You only do it if he’s causing major headaches in the locker room or there’s contract disputes ahead.

DaneMcCloud 02-19-2018 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13425569)
If they’re trading him because of political BS... then it’s stupid. You only do it if he’s causing major headaches in the locker room or there’s contract disputes ahead.

There are several reasons why they might trade him:

1. On field tirades
2. Suspension
3. Contract extension
4. Bad locker room influence
5. His value will never be higher than now.
6. Anthem

O.city 02-19-2018 05:01 PM

There’s too much smoke there at this point for it to be all bs.

Oh well.

One things for sure, if they trade him and he goes on to stay in the clear and stays on this track his currently in playing wise, that’s not gonna be good

DaneMcCloud 02-19-2018 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13425575)
There’s too much smoke there at this point for it to be all bs.

Oh well.

One things for sure, if they trade him and he goes on to stay in the clear and stays on this track his currently in playing wise, that’s not gonna be good

Or it could be addition by subtraction.

It’s too difficult to predict without knowing the return.

Chiefs=Champions 02-19-2018 05:04 PM

Peters is a playmaker and someone who can single handedly win you games. I would be ****ing pissed if we traded him. He's obviously a bit of a headcase at times, but i tend to think he will mature a bit as he ages. He's still so young and really has potential still untapped. Unless you are getting a kings ransom I simply would not trade him.

O.city 02-19-2018 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13425577)
Or it could be addition by subtraction.

It’s too difficult to predict without knowing the return.

He better be a ****ing diva clown in the locker room to consider trading him at this point

Sassy Squatch 02-19-2018 05:07 PM

Seriously? What kind of bullshit is this?

SAUTO 02-19-2018 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13425582)
He better be a ****ing diva clown in the locker room to consider trading him at this point

He better have ****ing shanked someone in the locker room that we never heard about.

DaneMcCloud 02-19-2018 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13425582)
He better be a ****ing diva clown in the locker room to consider trading him at this point

I think it has to go much deeper, as in Clark Hunt, Andy Reid and Brett Veach have come to the conclusion that they don’t feel comfortable giving Marcus Peters a 5 year, $90 million dollar deal.

pugsnotdrugs19 02-19-2018 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13425592)
I think it has to go much deeper, as in Clark Hunt, Andy Reid and Brett Veach have come to the conclusion that they don’t feel comfortable giving Marcus Peters a 5 year, $90 million dollar deal.

This is the most logical reasoning IMO. Clark said at the SB that he is obviously in talks with Andy and Brett about major signings and trades. There’s a good chance he doesn’t like the idea of giving him that money right now.

BryanBusby 02-19-2018 05:18 PM

Peters isn't going anywhere for now and they would be ****ing morons on shuffle him for a 2+4.

Easy 6 02-19-2018 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 13425569)
If they’re trading him because of political BS... then it’s stupid. You only do it if he’s causing major headaches in the locker room or there’s contract disputes ahead.

If this actually goes down, theres no way its about politics

It would have everything to do with his general temperment... 'can we trust this guy going forward after giving him a mega-contract?'

DaneMcCloud 02-19-2018 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 13425604)
Peters isn't going anywhere for now and they would be ****ing morons on shuffle him for a 2+4.

Peters has had difficulty keeping his emotions in check.

What do you think happens once he has $38 million guaranteed and a contract value of $90 million?

BryanBusby 02-19-2018 05:22 PM

The Chiefs would be selling very low on Peters right now, giving up a year of cheap CB play and creating a new hole in a time when they have many.

Jason is wrong over 75% of the time and you ****ers believe he has a slant all of a sudden? Kinda like how Dorsey is favorite for GB GM job? LMAO


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.