<div class="tenor-gif-embed" data-postid="9222847" data-share-method="host" data-width="100%" data-aspect-ratio="1.7785714285714287"><a href="https://tenor.com/view/ty-thank-you-thankyou-michael-gif-9222847">Steve Carell Thankyou GIF</a> from <a href="https://tenor.com/search/stevecarell-gifs">Stevecarell GIFs</a></div><script type="text/javascript" async src="https://tenor.com/embed.js"></script>

Clark is ****ing 25 years old, he's barely older than the guys that are being drafted and he is a proven stud at his position.

We didn't just trade for a dude that is 32.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Chiefs and Frank Clark reached agreement on a 5 yrs, $105.5 million contract - greater total than DeMarcus Lawrence, with $63.5 million guaranteed, per source.</p>&mdash; Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1120752347469221889?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 23, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

#29 picks have a like 35% chance of success.

We just signed a legit stud 25 year old DE with no holes in his game, had 13 sacks last year and gave up a 2020 2nd while moving up in the 3rd.

Rather than roll the dice.

When we win the ****ing Super Bowl and Clark is a major reason, I hope you all come back here and grovel.

If you don't give a shit about off the field issues, there's no reason on earth to complain about this trade. I DO have concerns, but as a player, Clark is ****ing excellent. You guys wanted to trade for Clowney? Clark is BETTER.

Whew shit.

They sent basically what is a 2nd round pick (29 is garbo tier) and we expect them to be content with that, in a draft that had maybe 17 first round players.

Cp: this first round is a butt****
Cp: why did we trade our first

Cha ching.

better average 12-15 sacks, and line up onsides

****balls. 500k more than Lawrence.

They seem to like all the draft picks we gave them and the fact frank was going to be too pricy for them.

God. Damn.

We'd better have an out after three years.

Someone hit up Frank and see if he will buy CP a new server.

Veach scouted him.

Dorsey did the dirty work. Dorsey pulled off the trade up. He did it for a reasonable price. And he smokescreened 5 or 6 other GMs and had them stunned when the trade went through and we got our guy.

THAT is the real reason why we have Mahomes. And I'm not even a Dorsey apologist. I'm just stating facts. There are parts of being a GM that go beyond being a front office scout who happens to have an ear with the guys in charge.

Veach has two modes of deals: piddly low risk deals and deals that make you go, "Jesus Christ, were you ****ing drunk, Brett?"

There's no in between. And there are no in between good deals. His best ones have been the low risk kind that have produced some kind of effect or player. The crap ones are REEEEALLY crap. And they stick around for a long time.

Dorsey had some good ones in his time. The first Jamaal extension. The Abdullah contract. The Kelce pick and subsequent extension. The Allen Bailey extension. He's had some crap ones, too, but he at least got some reasonable ones.

Veach has zero. It's either top of the market or a lukewarm "who cares?" type of situation.

Landon Collins has absolutely nothing to do with Frank Clark. What... why?

Huh?

Trading up to the top 20 most assuredly costs AT LEAST what we gave up for Clark, and it's still an unknown commodity. This team is clearly in win-now mode. They know what they have in Mahomes, and they are going for it.

This defense will be unrecognizable next year.

Frank Clark is a better end than Collins is a safety....when you change schemes you need guys.

They just added one of the 5 best 4-3 ends in the game to the team and people are complaining.

This was like when the Chiefs moved Jared Allen guess what..looking back now, that was stupid as ****.