Originally Posted by Megatron96
(Post 17375687)
Okay, I'll respond to this one; I know there's a couple others that responded to my post, but if I quote them all, this post will be too long.
I don't recall ever saying much about holds in this game; they happen and don't get flagged all the time, and since they made that modification to how they were going to call it it's gotten worse. They missed some holding calls. They didn't really affect the game, so whatever.
The first holding call vs. Smith was not a great call, but the 2nd one was just not holding. But again, that shit happens. didn't affect the outcome really.
The headbutt I get why they called it, just probably should've been a double foul and off-setting. Travis was yapping his ass off all game and helped instigate that shit. Now, I doubt Travis planned it that way (I believe he was just really fired up), but he didn't help the situation. It's a playoff game and I would've probably just flagged both players.
The Flowers thing I've already addressed twice. It was a legit flag.
I don't know which one was Connors/Likely. As it goes to DPI, the refs effed that up several times during the game, going both ways, iirc. I mentioned in my original post that at least twice flags should've been thrown against KC. And it doesn't matter if it was a bad decision to throw into triple coverage or if you think the ball was underthrown. That's not how the rule is written. The fact is that the ball was in the air and was going to come down pretty close to the BAL WR when a KC DB (number started with a 2) ran OVER the WR well before the ball was intercepted. If that situation was reversed, and that was a KC WR that got freight trained, you'd all be screaming "DPI!!! DPI!!!! DPI!!!!"
It's basically the same thing as when MVS got run over vs. GB(?) earlier in the season. That was DPI, period. If the defender runs the **** over the receiver before the ball gets there, it's DPI, period. Who was around the play, and whether you think the ball was underthrown/overthrown/you don't think the WR could catch it, or what color their jersey was, has absolutely nothing to do with it.
The Roquan thing. Yeah, he was too aggressive, no doubt. but it's a playoff game, and extra nonsense happens. That was a flag that seemed a little much for the situation. Flag him for encroachment or whatever, but it didn't need to be a 15-yarder, again imo.
I don't know what you're talking about with the kicker thing, sorry. Must've missed that, I guess.
Bottom line, I hate it when refs insert themselves into games. Too often it leads to events that seem to steer the game. It's to the point now that every time a great/exciting play happens, we can't even just be excited about it; first we have to wait to make sure there isn't a ****ing flag. And then we have to watch the replay to see if there should've been a goddamned flag.
And then there's the dipsticks that basically just wait and hope that there is a flag, to help their team gain an advantage, which is more utter BS, imo. Flags suck. And I really wish there were a lot less of them overall.
I'll ALWAYS be in favor of less flags, and in favor of letting the teams/players decide who wins over the refs. That's just my position on it. Sorry, not sorry.
|