Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 17963479)

His 'failure' is also not yet a failure.

If he was ready day one, he'd have gone top ten.

Originally Posted by AusChief (Post 17963921)

Trade this years 1st and next years to the Giants for Andrew Thomas

Yep big price but he’s locked in on a reasonable deal (for the player he is) for 5-6 years.

The draft and FA ain’t helping this year.

Originally Posted by milkshock (Post 17963922)

If you are proposing that we risk him as a starter on day one next season then that cannot happen.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by AusChief (Post 17963921)

Trade this years 1st and next years to the Giants for Andrew Thomas

Yep big price but he’s locked in on a reasonable deal (for the player he is) for 5-6 years.

The draft and FA ain’t helping this year.

Originally Posted by AusChief (Post 17963921)

Trade this years 1st and next years to the Giants for Andrew Thomas

Yep big price but he’s locked in on a reasonable deal (for the player he is) for 5-6 years.

The draft and FA ain’t helping this year.

Originally Posted by SHOWTIME (Post 17963920)

JJ Watt sums it up...we got away with it in the past against (1) teams with great edge rushers and no interior pressure and (2) teams with great interior rushers and no edge pressure. Eagles had great rushers across their d-line.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Eagles didn’t blitz Chiefs one time last night. Similar to Bucs vs. KC in the 2021 Super Bowl.<br><br>But it’s not as simple as “blitz vs. no-blitz”.<br><br>To win with just a 4-man rush, you have to have monsters on the edge and beasts in the middle.<br><br>Great edge rushers can be neutralized…</p>&mdash; JJ Watt (@JJWatt) <a href="https://twitter.com/JJWatt/status/1889065775732027472?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 10, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 17963331)

Change for the sake of change isn't always good. They spent a 2nd round pick on Kingsley. Do it again. Take two.

But there's absolutely no reason for them to trade up if they're not trading up for something that is surely better. You're active in the draft forums. You know how often those guys in the 20's pan out. Short of a monumental trade, we are giving away multiple picks for another Kingsley. That would be overeactionary and stupid.

Originally Posted by SHOWTIME (Post 17964054)

The Giants have had o-line issues for years. They are not about to trade their best player on offense other than Nabers, especially since they are about to draft a QB.

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 17964065)

Yeah, their selling points right now are that they have the foundations on offense. Franchise LT, franchise WR, good young RB. Just need the QB to make it work and ascend quickly.

I’ve looked around rosters. I don’t think there’s a young LT to be had, at least not one that you feel like settles the position for years, like people want.

If you can’t sign one of Cam Robinson, Stanley, or Alaric Jackson, I think you can take a numbers game approach as the best bet.

Sign a floor vet like Humphries. Sign a second-chance guy like Jedrick Willis. Draft another guy with traits.

Throw them in the pot with guys you have on hand and see what comes out.

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17964077)

Any way the Chargers are gonna trade Slater? Surely not right?

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 17964080)

I mean, you are joking, right?

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17964077)

Any way the Chargers are gonna trade Slater? Surely not right?

Originally Posted by OKchiefs (Post 17963348)

Why is it just another Suamataia? Who knows what their grades are but it’s entirely possible they have a higher grade on one of these guys than they did this year on Kingsley.