ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs ***OFFICIAL Chiefs vs Vikings thread*** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=212303)

kcchiefsus 08-21-2009 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5992129)
Those teams had easy schedules, especially the Dolphins..

Do you think the Chiefs can win any of the games vs the NFC East, and we have the north 2 so that's atleast 2 losses right there.

Better team doesn't always win, we almost beat San Diego twice last year for example. On paper and on the field we are probably worse than all 4 of the NFC East teams but that doesn't mean we won't come out of those 4 games with zero wins. Not saying I would bet on us in any of those games but I wouldn't count any game an automatic loss. We'll win some games we shouldn't this year.

DBOSHO 08-21-2009 09:27 PM

just to clarify i know the opening schedule is a gauntlet. an IF we somehow make it 3-4 or 4-3 which is doubtful, i think we could be dangerous. confidence is a weapon.

Mecca 08-21-2009 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 5992131)
LJ is basically a below average back now.

He's getting old and he had a huge carry year, it's really not surprising.

Mecca 08-21-2009 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsus (Post 5992137)
Better team doesn't always win, we almost beat San Diego twice last year for example. On paper and on the field we are probably worse than all 4 of the NFC East teams but that doesn't mean we won't come out of those 4 games with zero wins. Not saying I would bet on us in any of those games but I wouldn't count any game an automatic loss. We'll win some games we shouldn't this year.

I give them a chance against the Redskins, I expect them to get fully raped by the Giants and Eagles though.

CosmicPal 08-21-2009 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5992129)
Those teams had easy schedules, especially the Dolphins..

Do you think the Chiefs can win any of the games vs the NFC East, and we have the north 2 so that's atleast 2 losses right there.

I agree...our schedule is the bitch this season. We won't win very many games this season, but it ought to make us a stronger, meaner team for it.

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-21-2009 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 5992131)
LJ is basically a below average back now.

I can't wait for GoChiefs to explain to us all how LJ saved the day, and Mike Brown doesn't SUCK BALLS.:rolleyes:

TrickyNicky 08-21-2009 09:29 PM

Was pollard in after the first series? I know Brown replaced him early, but did he ever go back out?

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-21-2009 09:30 PM

EDIT:

SUCK BALLS.

DTLB58 08-21-2009 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBOSHO (Post 5992138)
just to clarify i know the opening schedule is a gauntlet. an IF we somehow make it 3-4 or 4-3 which is doubtful, i think we could be dangerous. confidence is a weapon.

6-10 and 3 of those don't come till December. We have a rough schedule.

DBOSHO 08-21-2009 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5992129)
Those teams had easy schedules, especially the Dolphins..

Do you think the Chiefs can win any of the games vs the NFC East, and we have the north 2 so that's atleast 2 losses right there.

well....did u think even w cassel that the dolphins wouldve demolished the pats like they did? this is my optimistic prediction.i see the chiefs beating washington and MAYBE dallas.oakland both, san diego and denver 1 apiece, cleveland and cinci. so 8-8. id call that a successful season

DTLB58 08-21-2009 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 5992125)
It was a terrible play call. It is a high-risk play on 4th down. It was idiotic as it gets.

Yea, The QB and WR have to have the timing of that down after working together for awhile imo to make that work at a decent success rate. It was high risk for success agreed.

Mecca 08-21-2009 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBOSHO (Post 5992169)
well....did u think even w cassel that the dolphins wouldve demolished the pats like they did? this is my optimistic prediction.i see the chiefs beating washington and MAYBE dallas.oakland both, san diego and denver 1 apiece, cleveland and cinci. so 8-8. id call that a successful season

I have to see how they play the run before I predict some of those, if we play the run poor or have the NT problems guys like Marion Barber will shred us.

cdcox 08-21-2009 09:36 PM

I guess the folks in KC didn't have to suffer through these Vike homer announcers? They are slobbering all over Favre.

Pioli Zombie 08-21-2009 09:36 PM

the chiefs defense looked great. Favre belonged here
www.doodie.com
Posted via Mobile Device

LaChapelle 08-21-2009 09:38 PM

No wonder it came down to the last play. The Vikes' balls are getting gargled non stop.

DBOSHO 08-21-2009 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5992176)
I have to see how they play the run before I predict some of those, if we play the run poor or have the NT problems guys like Marion Barber will shred us.

agreed. they looked ok today

DTLB58 08-21-2009 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stumppy (Post 5992115)
Yea, nobody likes to loose but I can wait awhile. It's going to take them a little time to put together a consistently winning team .

Yep, Usually took Parcells 3 years to turn a team around when he was coaching to make the playoffs.

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-21-2009 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DTLB58 (Post 5992170)
Yea, The QB and WR have to have the timing of that down after working together for awhile imo to make that work at a decent success rate. It was high risk for success agreed.

He did not just call bullshit on our Head Coach did he?

cdcox 08-21-2009 09:41 PM

Cassel looked like Huard on that sack.

cdcox 08-21-2009 09:42 PM

Bennie Sapp is still the blitz corner.

OnTheWarpath15 08-21-2009 09:45 PM

The 1st quarter confirmed what I thought last week:

Mike Goff is ****ing terrible.

DBOSHO 08-21-2009 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5992201)
The 1st quarter confirmed what I thought last week:

Mike Goff is ****ing terrible.

what can brown do for you?

OnTheWarpath15 08-21-2009 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBOSHO (Post 5992208)
what can brown do for you?

Just now watching the replay, but he can't be any worse.

DBOSHO 08-21-2009 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5992209)
Just now watching the replay, but he can't be any worse.

for how big he is be better do somethin

ArrowheadMagic 08-21-2009 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5992209)
Just now watching the replay, but he can't be any worse.

You havent watched enough yet... it will come.

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-21-2009 09:52 PM

KCFX just interviewed Mays. They're trying to get him to acknowledge that he's emerging, that he's doing well.

Tried to do it twice. His answer both times?

"We didn't win".

Welcome to Kansas City kid, you're alright by me. Go take that job.

DBOSHO 08-21-2009 09:53 PM

thomas is done.

cdcox 08-21-2009 09:54 PM

Duane Bowe vs. Bennie Sapp. Yeah I like that match up.

DBOSHO 08-21-2009 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 5992220)
Duane Bowe vs. Bennie Sapp. Yeah I like that match up.

i like dwayne bowe vs sapp even better

Titty Meat 08-21-2009 10:03 PM

Cassel: **** you haters

cdcox 08-21-2009 10:04 PM

Peterson pwns Vrable.

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-21-2009 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5992244)
Cassel: **** you haters

Brown: I ****ing S-U-C-K. With an LJ SUCK-Chaser.:evil::evil::evil:

Titty Meat 08-21-2009 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 5992147)
I can't wait for GoChiefs to explain to us all how LJ saved the day, and Mike Brown doesn't SUCK BALLS.:rolleyes:

Mike Brown played solid what you talking about?

milkman 08-21-2009 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5992201)
The 1st quarter confirmed what I thought last week:

Mike Goff is ****ing terrible.

Just now watching the replay, like you, and te right side is still, far and away, the worst part of this team.

Goff is better than Adrain Jones, but better than bad does not equal good.

Richardson is simply not a RT.

Titty Meat 08-21-2009 10:05 PM

The defense played pretty good aginst Adrian Peterson. Is it a coisidence that Bernard Pollard wasn't in and the chiefs played good aginst the run?

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-21-2009 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5992256)
The defense played pretty good aginst Adrian Peterson. Is it a coisidence that Bernard Pollard wasn't in and the chiefs played good aginst the run?

Your Savior was OUT OF POSITION, TAKING BAD ANGLES, AND STINKING UP THE JOINT!

Hush! Hush you!

OnTheWarpath15 08-21-2009 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5992255)
Just now watching the replay, like you, and te right side is still, far and away, the worst part of this team.

Goff is better than Adrain Jones, but better than bad does not equal good.

Richardson is simply not a RT.

I can honestly say that I'm not sure Goff is better than Jones.

Niswanger looks like he's regressed, not improved.

The RT position is a cluster****.

Christ, even Brian Waters and Branden Albert looked shaky tonight.

Titty Meat 08-21-2009 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5992264)
I can honestly say that I'm not sure Goff is better than Jones.

Niswanger looks like he's regressed, not improved.

The RT position is a cluster****.

Christ, even Brian Waters and Branden Albert looked shaky tonight.

It was 1 pre-season game. If you want Richardson to be the RT you're going to have to let him play atleast til week 4 or 5 to see what he is. Did you honestly not see this coming? The Vikes defense is awesome.

Mecca 08-21-2009 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5992264)
I can honestly say that I'm not sure Goff is better than Jones.

Niswanger looks like he's regressed, not improved.

The RT position is a cluster****.

Christ, even Brian Waters and Branden Albert looked shaky tonight.

The Albert one baffled me he got Brian Robison not Jared Allen...I thought the OL would atleast look competent with 2 of Minnesota's best players not going.

Mecca 08-21-2009 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5992269)
It was 1 pre-season game. If you want Richardson to be the RT you're going to have to let him play atleast til week 4 or 5 to see what he is. Did you honestly not see this coming? The Vikes defense is awesome.

2 of their starting 4...2 of the big 3, didn't suit up, that's where the issue comes.

cdcox 08-21-2009 10:11 PM

Blitz didn't get there and the WR beat the LB.

OnTheWarpath15 08-21-2009 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5992269)
It was 1 pre-season game. If you want Richardson to be the RT you're going to have to let him play atleast til week 4 or 5 to see what he is. Did you honestly not see this coming? The Vikes defense is awesome.

What part of Jared Allen and Pat Williams not playing do you not understand?

I'm not worried about Richardson.

The fact that someone thought Mike Goff could still be effective and nothing was done to improve the center/RT positions is my main concern.

The "awesome" defense excuse means jack shit, considering we play 6 of the top 8 defenses from last year.

Get used to this.

milkman 08-21-2009 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5992264)
I can honestly say that I'm not sure Goff is better than Jones.

Niswanger looks like he's regressed, not improved.

The RT position is a cluster****.

Christ, even Brian Waters and Branden Albert looked shaky tonight.

Niswanger is still struggling with technique, but it's more about thinking about proper technique rather than bad technique.

And as bad as Goff looks, yes, he is still better than Jones.

As for Albert and Waters, I kind of expected this kind of struggle from them with Haley's conditioning.

They've lost the weight, but now they have to adjust to the weight loss.

Titty Meat 08-21-2009 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5992278)
What part of Jared Allen and Pat Williams not playing do you not understand?

I'm not worried about Richardson.

The fact that someone thought Mike Goff could still be effective and nothing was done to improve the center/RT positions is my main concern.

The "awesome" defense excuse means jack shit, considering we play 6 of the top 8 defenses from last year.

Get used to this.

Where did I say I expect the Chiefs offense to be awesome at? I said somewhere that it seems as though Pioli didn't do enough to upgrade the o-line. Atleast we have a mobile QB whos accurate this year and won't have to play a gimmick offense.

Mecca 08-21-2009 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5992282)
Where did I say I expect the Chiefs offense to be awesome at? I said somewhere that it seems as though Pioli didn't do enough to upgrade the o-line. Atleast we have a mobile QB whos accurate this year and won't have to play a gimmick offense.

If that line is like that all year Cassel is either going to get injured or become so uncomfortable in the pocket it takes him years to overcome it.

Titty Meat 08-21-2009 10:15 PM

Also if you want to run the ball it'd be nice to have a good fullback. Mike Cox isn't a good fullback.

DeezNutz 08-21-2009 10:16 PM

If you're going to run the ball, it also helps when your RB isn't a complete ****ing pussy.

CosmicPal 08-21-2009 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5992280)

As for Albert and Waters, I kind of expected this kind of struggle from them with Haley's conditioning.

They've lost the weight, but now they have to adjust to the weight loss.

Isn't the weight loss supposed to make them stronger and more efficient? :shrug:

I was under the impression the weight loss was designed to remove unnecessary fat and make them leaner and stronger. Maybe this isn't such a good idea for the linemen, but so much better for all the other positions.

Titty Meat 08-21-2009 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5992284)
If that line is like that all year Cassel is either going to get injured or become so uncomfortable in the pocket it takes him years to overcome it.

It probably won't be that bad all season. It's only the 2nd pre-season game and theres new guys in the lineup. Lets wait and see before we claim this is the worse o-line ever.

Titty Meat 08-21-2009 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5992287)
If you're going to run the ball, it also helps when your RB isn't a complete ****ing pussy.

Not this shit again. So you're going to bash LJ and praise Jackie Battle? The same guy who couldn't get a yard when the game was on the line vs third string players.

Mecca 08-21-2009 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5992289)
It probably won't be that bad all season. It's only the 2nd pre-season game and theres new guys in the lineup. Lets wait and see before we claim this is the worse o-line ever.

The problem is some of the early games on the schedule are brutal...we got this guy no Oline help and now he's facing teams that terrorize QB's.

DeezNutz 08-21-2009 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5992292)
Not this shit again. So you're going to bash LJ and praise Jackie Battle? The same guy who couldn't get a yard when the game was on the line vs third string players.

There isn't a starting RB on this roster.

Titty Meat 08-21-2009 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5992296)
There isn't a starting RB on this roster.

That's something we can agree on.

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-21-2009 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5992287)
If you're going to run the ball, it also helps when your RB isn't a complete ****ing pussy.

Or doesn't require a combine-plowed sized hole to get through.

Mecca 08-21-2009 10:19 PM

That Larry Johnson contract looks awesome now!

CosmicPal 08-21-2009 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5992292)
Not this shit again. So you're going to bash LJ and praise Jackie Battle? The same guy who couldn't get a yard when the game was on the line vs third string players.

He should have used his speed to get outside. There wasn't much he could do when four linemen beat our OL and met him in the middle.

Titty Meat 08-21-2009 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5992293)
The problem is some of the early games on the schedule are brutal...we got this guy no Oline help and now he's facing teams that terrorize QB's.

Heres where I pull the trust in Pioli card. I don't think the guy is stupid enough to spend all that money on a QB and not provide a servicable o-line. I hope I am right but the first 2 games say otherwise.

Titty Meat 08-21-2009 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CosmicPal (Post 5992301)
He should have used his speed to get outside. There wasn't much he could do when four linemen beat our OL and met him in the middle.

And that doesn't happen to LJ? Thankfully the Chiefs have Cassel because that o-line played like garbage and Cassel made some plays. Every Chiefs fan should applaud Cassel's effort.

UsualSuspects 08-21-2009 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5992282)
Where did I say I expect the Chiefs offense to be awesome at? I said somewhere that it seems as though Pioli didn't do enough to upgrade the o-line. Atleast we have a mobile QB whos accurate this year and won't have to play a gimmick offense.


I believe he was referring to your "awesome" defense reference even though 2 of the top 4 defensive players were not starting for Minn.

Mecca 08-21-2009 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5992303)
Heres where I pull the trust in Pioli card. I don't think the guy is stupid enough to spend all that money on a QB and not provide a servicable o-line. I hope I am right but the first 2 games say otherwise.

I really feel bad for Matt Cassel, this guy has to face the Giants with this line, DeMarcus Ware with this line..the Ravens, Steelers, Albert Haynesworth lining up over Mike Goff...

CosmicPal 08-21-2009 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5992306)
And that doesn't happen to LJ? Thankfully the Chiefs have Cassel because that o-line played like garbage and Cassel made some plays. Every Chiefs fan should applaud Cassel's effort.

I'm not praising Battle, nor LJ. I'm just saying Battle didn't have a chance in hell when that defensive line blew up the middle.

Titty Meat 08-21-2009 10:22 PM

Also for your people who bitched about trading Gonzalez, Haley answered your question how they'll make up for him.

DeezNutz 08-21-2009 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5992300)
That Larry Johnson contract looks awesome now!

Honestly, it looks the same to me now as it did when he signed it.

Hated it then. Hate it now.

milkman 08-21-2009 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CosmicPal (Post 5992288)
Isn't the weight loss supposed to make them stronger and more efficient? :shrug:

I was under the impression the weight loss was designed to remove unnecessary fat and make them leaner and stronger. Maybe this isn't such a good idea for the linemen, but so much better for all the other positions.

The thing is, he still hasn't really learned all the nuances of the position, and now he's lighter, and proper footwork and technique become more important.

Mecca 08-21-2009 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5992312)
Also for your people who bitched about trading Gonzalez, Haley answered your question how they'll make up for him.

I don't care about that trade, I do however care that it looks like Matt Cassel is going to get hit/sacked more than any other QB in the league.

ArrowheadMagic 08-21-2009 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5992300)
That Larry Johnson contract looks awesome now!

we are under the cap.... it hasnt hurt us one bit. The way it pays out.... under the current CBA.... he can be cut next june and its paid less than half what he signed for.

Titty Meat 08-21-2009 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5992310)
I really feel bad for Matt Cassel, this guy has to face the Giants with this line, DeMarcus Ware with this line..the Ravens, Steelers, Albert Haynesworth lining up over Mike Goff...

I thought the same thing watching the game tonight I said " the line better not play like this vs Baltimore." It's only the 2nd pre-season game though lets wait and see. I don't believe the line will be bad the whole year. Atleast Haley/Pioli are playing guys who actually have played football the past few years compared to Adrian Jones, Terry, Turley, ect.

Titty Meat 08-21-2009 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5992321)
I don't care about that trade, I do however care that it looks like Matt Cassel is going to get hit/sacked more than any other QB in the league.

You should love that trade. A 2nd round pick next year for a cry baby tight end. Perfect example last year Gonzalez bitched about the record even though the team won. Tonight Mays played great and wouldn't acknolwedge it because the team lost. This is going to be a much better team.

DeezNutz 08-21-2009 10:27 PM

Haley and co. will game plan around the line.

Get ready for vanilla in bunches, RRP (underneath). All in an effort to keep Cassel alive.

Mecca 08-21-2009 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5992329)
You should love that trade. A 2nd round pick next year for a cry baby tight end. Perfect example last year Gonzalez bitched about the record even though the team won. Tonight Mays played great and wouldn't acknolwedge it because the team lost. This is going to be a much better team.

That's great but they still need talent.

Right now any teams that can rush the passer are going to really **** with the Chiefs.

OnTheWarpath15 08-21-2009 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5992333)
Haley and co. will game plan around the line.

Get ready for vanilla in bunches, RRP (underneath). All in an effort to keep Cassel alive.

Oh, the irony if this actually happens.

Chiefnj2 08-21-2009 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5992329)
You should love that trade. A 2nd round pick next year for a cry baby tight end. Perfect example last year Gonzalez bitched about the record even though the team won. Tonight Mays played great and wouldn't acknolwedge it because the team lost. This is going to be a much better team.

Don't be stupid. The team is better with Tony.

okcchief 08-21-2009 10:28 PM

I have to agree with Mecca.

I feel better about bringing in Cassel because he looks like he can make plays. However, the fact that he is constantly running for his life all the time scares the shit out of me.

DeezNutz 08-21-2009 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5992334)
That's great but they still need talent.

Right now any teams that can rush the passer are going to really **** with the Chiefs.

And on defense, we'll be ok as long as teams don't run up the middle or expose our LBs in coverage.

Titty Meat 08-21-2009 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5992334)
That's great but they still need talent.

Right now any teams that can rush the passer are going to really **** with the Chiefs.

The same thing happend to Cassel last year. As Deeznutz said Haley will gameplan around the o-line. The o-line will only improve from these past few games.

OnTheWarpath15 08-21-2009 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5992342)
And on defense, we'll be ok as long as teams don't run up the middle or expose our LBs in coverage.

LMAO

Titty Meat 08-21-2009 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5992340)
Don't be stupid. The team is better with Tony.

Not really.

DeezNutz 08-21-2009 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5992339)
Oh, the irony if this actually happens.

This board will meltdown.

But based on what I saw tonight, with these same guys, I'm having a hard time envisioning other possibilities.

If this were a reg. season game, I would have been shocked if Cassel were able to play the entire game.

Mecca 08-21-2009 10:30 PM

This is why I kind of give a baffled look when people say 8 wins or something like that.

I have a really really bad image of how the Chiefs will handle Justin Tuck coming off the right side...

Titty Meat 08-21-2009 10:30 PM

It was refreshing seeing screen passes and a reverse. Something Herm never did.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.