ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   MU ****Official 2015 Missouri Tigers Football Thread**** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=289639)

duncan_idaho 11-16-2015 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 11888142)
That's why I hope it's Odom.

Herman may be a better coach in the near term, but you know he's gone if/when Ohio State opens up, especially if he has success at Mizzou.

Meanwhile, if Odom is legit, he could run this program for 25 years and I don't think we'd risk losing him.

I think you become a destination school by not being used as a stepping stone. The only way to truly become a next tier program would be to maintain a decade or more of stability.

Then again, Urban Meyer is only 51. If you bring Herman in and Meyer coaches for another 15 years, it seems less likely that Herman would leave for another program. Even if he does, if the Tigers get that 10-15 years of stability out of him, maybe that's enough to make us a front of the line program for future hires. Additionally, Herman's an offensive guy so maybe he's enough of a different fit in the SEC that it gives us a slight competitive advantage (rather than trying to out 'Bama Bama, as Odom would likely do).

Those are the two guys that I'd really want. Those are the clear frontrunners to me.


EDIT: It would appear you had this conversation already.

But I haven't had it with you!

I love both guys and would be really excited about both.

I think the primary thing that makes you a destination job is being consistently excellent as a program.

it's much more of a destination now, and I think that's due more to success than anything else.

Give Missouri 3-4 years of great success under Herman (who, by the way, would inherit a lot of talent at Mizzou), and it's going to be more of a destination then than it is now. And Odom is going to be a few years into his coaching career, likely at Memphis, and will have proven a little more/still be out there.

As I said on PM, if Rhoades hires Odom instead of Herman, that says an awful lot about Odom considering Rhoades' recent history at Houston (promoting a good assistant to replace a successful outgoing coach, having that guy fail to meet expectations, replacing him).

duncan_idaho 11-16-2015 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 11888191)
If Odom and Kul would stick around for a Herman regime, then I'd go with him. But I don't want to lose either of those two.

Odom is going to be a head coach somewhere next year. He'll be a prime candidate at Memphis if nothing else.

O.city 11-16-2015 11:12 AM

I always figured Odom was hired as the predecessor to pinkie anyway. Seems like an easy fit and high upside one.

DJ's left nut 11-16-2015 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 11888197)
But I haven't had it with you!

I love both guys and would be really excited about both.

I think the primary thing that makes you a destination job is being consistently excellent as a program.

it's much more of a destination now, and I think that's due more to success than anything else.

Give Missouri 3-4 years of great success under Herman (who, by the way, would inherit a lot of talent at Mizzou), and it's going to be more of a destination then than it is now. And Odom is going to be a few years into his coaching career, likely at Memphis, and will have proven a little more/still be out there.

As I said on PM, if Rhoades hires Odom instead of Herman, that says an awful lot about Odom considering Rhoades' recent history at Houston (promoting a good assistant to replace a successful outgoing coach, having that guy fail to meet expectations, replacing him).

I suspect being in the SEC would change things a bit, I just worry that if you get a guy and after 5 years he goes on to a bigger school, it sorta 'codifies' the pecking order a little, you know?

Perception is reality in college sports and even if you get some success with Herman, if he leaves, that's a loud signal to the rest of the NCAA that Mizzou is still something of a little brother program. It wouldn't take much to get stigmatized a bit there.

Then again, that's an attitude that would've had me hiring Kim Anderson over Bob Self back when we made the Snyder hire. The thought process that went into that hire was just spot on; that's what makes its failure so disappointing. It's like the Chiefs with Blackledge - a bad move based on a good thought process led to the thought process being abandoned (rather than it just being chalked up as bad luck or bad execution of a good plan).

Like I said - I'd like both of those hires because as you noted, they'd almost certainly have been made for the right reasons.

I'm not worried about Missouri football. This is a school that's committed to sustained success and I think GP will keep his fingerprints on the program for the foreseeable future. Despite the chaos of the 2015 season, I think things can go very well if we just do this right.

KChiefs1 11-16-2015 11:23 AM

I'd be happy with Fuente or Herman.

duncan_idaho 11-16-2015 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 11888238)
I suspect being in the SEC would change things a bit, I just worry that if you get a guy and after 5 years he goes on to a bigger school, it sorta 'codifies' the pecking order a little, you know?

Perception is reality in college sports and even if you get some success with Herman, if he leaves, that's a loud signal to the rest of the NCAA that Mizzou is still something of a little brother program. It wouldn't take much to get stigmatized a bit there.

Then again, that's an attitude that would've had me hiring Kim Anderson over Bob Self back when we made the Snyder hire. The thought process that went into that hire was just spot on; that's what makes its failure so disappointing. It's like the Chiefs with Blackledge - a bad move based on a good thought process led to the thought process being abandoned (rather than it just being chalked up as bad luck or bad execution of a good plan).

Like I said - I'd like both of those hires because as you noted, they'd almost certainly have been made for the right reasons.

I'm not worried about Missouri football. This is a school that's committed to sustained success and I think GP will keep his fingerprints on the program for the foreseeable future. Despite the chaos of the 2015 season, I think things can go very well if we just do this right.

Agreed.

And with a little shakeup and keeping the core group of players around, Mizzou is positioned to make a nice run in 2016 and 2017.

I think Odom would have to hire a new OC who brings some new thought and explosiveness to the offense (He and Henson have been rivals, though I'm starting to hear some people talk about them being really close friends - that's a new one) to make that happen, but it's possible.

DJ's left nut 11-16-2015 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 11888243)
I'd be happy with Fuente or Herman.

Sell me on Fuente.

I'm not sure I dislike him, but I still think he's a bit green for my tastes and the AAC is a staggeringly awful conference. It's a re-badged conference USA. I guess that doesn't do much to separate him from Herman and Houston, but Herman's success as an OC came in the Big 10 whereas TCU was still in the Mountain West when Fuente was in charge.

I'm open to conversation on him. I'm guessing the fact that he has HC experience elevates him over Odom for you?

Saul Good 11-16-2015 11:33 AM

What is the fascination with Herman, by the way?

DJ's left nut 11-16-2015 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11888276)
What is the fascination with Herman, by the way?

For me its his energy, his recruiting ties, his pedigree and familiarity with Rhoades.

KChiefs1 11-16-2015 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 11888266)
Sell me on Fuente.



I'm not sure I dislike him, but I still think he's a bit green for my tastes and the AAC is a staggeringly awful conference. It's a re-badged conference USA. I guess that doesn't do much to separate him from Herman and Houston, but Herman's success as an OC came in the Big 10 whereas TCU was still in the Mountain West when Fuente was in charge.



I'm open to conversation on him. I'm guessing the fact that he has HC experience elevates him over Odom for you?


Fuente built the Memphis football from nothing. He is coaching his own players & winning at a program he built from the ground up. Odom was there along for the ride & was a key contributor but Fuente was the master of the ship.

KChiefs1 11-16-2015 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11888276)
What is the fascination with Herman, by the way?


He is an offensive genius. He is still an unproven commodity but his background is top notch.

duncan_idaho 11-16-2015 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11888276)
What is the fascination with Herman, by the way?

1) Pedigree. He's an innovative and highly successful offensive mind who was hand-picked by the best offensive mind of the past decade (Urban Meyer) to run his offense. He has succeeded in several environments.

2) Upside. In addition to his strong offensive profile, Herman also has been a top-notch recruiter at multiple stops. His first class at Houston is impressive. He's young and hungry, and has learned from some of the best.

KChiefs1 11-16-2015 12:00 PM

AJ Ofodile on the coaching hire:

I think it gets overlooked that Herman inherited a UH team that was 8-5 a year ago with all the pieces already in place.

Fuente/Odom inherited a Memphis team that was one of the worst in the country. It was a total reclamation project and what they did to find players and restock that roster was pretty amazing. I met Herman during the recruiting process and he was an energetic likeable guy and Urban Meyer is probably the best at recruiting strategy so that experience had to be invaluable for him. Similarly Barry's experience in raising the Memphis program from the dead also can't be discounted.

When you're talking about proven commodities I don't know that Herman really qualifies as that yet until he has roster filled with his own recruits. It's also worth noting that Memphis' QB could be the top pick in the draft this spring so their results could be a little over inflated right now too.

All 3 guys are big time up and comers, you can't really call any of them proven yet, as there are circumstances that has the jury still out on all 3. That having been said, Barry will be a head coach somewhere in the future. No reasonable person should bet against him being extremely successful where ever that is. To me he would be the common sense hire for Mizzou. He is tremendously respected in Missouri, Oklahoma, East Texas, Atlanta and Memphis. When you look closely at his track record as a recruiter it shows how much credibility he has already established in those areas. He has a ton of respect in the coaching community which means he has the ability to identify and attract high level assistants when positions need to be filled. He's a smart guy and would make the right moves to situate the program favorably going forward.

BryanBusby 11-16-2015 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 11888002)
They're not going to go cheap. Look at what they're paying Pinkel. Rhoades is well aware of the importance of making a good hire that keeps football in a strong place (and keeps money flowing into the AD).

I dont think the Texas job is going to be open. Strong bought himself another year with the OU win.

USCw is going to hire a different candidate than Mizzou will. Don't think they're competing for the same guy...

USCe, if that is who you meant, is a similar position as Mizzou, but the Tigers can stack up there and win a competition for a coach, if they want to.

If Mizzou ends up hiring Odom, I truly think it's because that's who Rhoades thought was the best fit for the job, not an attempt to go cheap.

It also would almost certainly mean Henson is out, because he and Odom don't get along (and the only reason Henson is still there is that he thought he had a good shot at this job when Pinkel retired).

That considered, Henson is probably out, regardless.

Yes they paid a good share to Pinkel, but Pinkel was a certain proven commodity here and earned his keep.

Paying an unknown more than what Pinkel makes, which is what it might take to get someone like Herman, is something I'm not sure about.

Saul Good 11-16-2015 12:34 PM

So...what if Right is available?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.