ChiefsPlanet
Page 168 of 250 « First 68118158164165166167 168 169170171172178218 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs *****OFFICIAL 2013 Kansas City Chiefs Training Camp Thread***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=274697)

Marcellus 08-04-2013 06:54 PM
Someone please provide me a link to a post from a valid member of CP who expected Fisher to kick ass out the gate.

Provide that post or shut the **** up about acting like that was predicted.

You wont find it because it doesn't exist as far as I know. Fact is fisher was a gamble based on potential which has been stated.

To try to change the story now is ****ing stupid.

**** I didn't even want Fisher.

Marcellus 08-04-2013 06:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9858769)
There is no strawman.

That is the exact bullshit we heard every ****ing day leading up to the draft.

If you say otherwise, your a lying sack of shit.
Horseshit. Complete Horseshit.

Prove it Milk, show me the post.

Setsuna 08-04-2013 06:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9858759)
Again I ask who is expecting that?

Strawman arguments being built all over CP.
Keep backtracking TFM.

milkman 08-04-2013 06:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 9858764)
Dude, seriously?? Geno wasn't drafted until the 2nd ****ing round. Apparently 32 teams felt he was not worthy of a 1st round pick, let alone a #1 pick.
Don't give a rat's ass where he, or any QB, was drafted.

I argued that if you believed a QB's upside was great, but you thought he needed to sit for a year or 2, you take him anyway.

Don't ****ing tell me to give another position 3 years, when you were telling ne before that we needed that pick to produce right away as your argument against mine.

Double standards, mother****er.

SAUTO 08-04-2013 06:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9858606)
I think most people felt he should be "awesome out of the gate", myself included

It's pretty much a given that if a player is selected in the Top Ten of the first round, let alone #1 overall, the expectations are to start and kick ass from Day One.
Here is a quote from today Marcellus.

There were many prior to the draft
Posted via Mobile Device

Marcellus 08-04-2013 06:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9858776)
Don't give a rat's ass where he, or any QB, was drafted.

I argued that if you believed a QB's upside was great, but you thought he needed to sit for a year or 2, you take him anyway.

Don't ****ing tell me to give another position 3 years, when you were telling ne before that we needed that pick to produce right away as your argument against mine.

Double standards, mother****er.
Show me where a valid member of Cp expects Fisher to take 3 years to develop.

Show me.

petegz28 08-04-2013 06:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9858776)
Don't give a rat's ass where he, or any QB, was drafted.

I argued that if you believed a QB's upside was great, but you thought he needed to sit for a year or 2, you take him anyway.

Don't ****ing tell me to give another position 3 years, when you were telling ne before that we needed that pick to produce right away as your argument against mine.

Double standards, mother****er.
I don't know what you're all in a huff about? We did draft a QB who has probably the most upside of the class and we didn't even waste a draft pick on him. And yes, he needs to sit a year or two.

SAUTO 08-04-2013 06:58 PM
**** is on this page even
Posted via Mobile Device

milkman 08-04-2013 06:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9858772)
Horseshit. Complete Horseshit.

Prove it Milk, show me the post.
Don't have to prove a ****ing thing.

Everyone sasw it.
Everyone knows it.

You keep spinning.

Marcellus 08-04-2013 07:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9858780)
Here is a quote from today Marcellus.

There were many prior to the draft
Posted via Mobile Device
Ok so that post set the standard?

I feel like I am caught in the middle as usual.

Dude shouldn't be expected to be All Pro day 1 but I dont expect he will take 3 years to mature.

He should be a solid starter day 1 and mature into an above average player at a MINIMUM.

Marcellus 08-04-2013 07:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9858786)
Don't have to prove a ****ing thing.

Everyone sasw it.
Everyone knows it.

You keep spinning.
Ok you shouldn't be bothered by burden of proof, just type.

keg in kc 08-04-2013 07:01 PM
Interesting depth chart.

milkman 08-04-2013 07:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 9858783)
I don't know what you're all in a huff about? We did draft a QB who has probably the most upside of the class and we didn't even waste a draft pick on him. And yes, he needs to sit a year or two.
Sick of the bullshitg.

And Tyler Bray?
UDFA.

I am not putting hope in a ****ing miracle.

petegz28 08-04-2013 07:02 PM
I expect, as most people do I am sure, that Fisher is going to have some really good plays and some really, really bad plays this year. I don't think he will take 3 years to become "good" but I don't expect anyone outside of a rushback, HB, or WR to make a significant impact in year 1.

petegz28 08-04-2013 07:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9858796)
Sick of the bullshitg.

And Tyler Bray?
UDFA.

I am not putting hope in a ****ing miracle.
He wasn't undrafted because of his lack of talent. Not that I am aware of anyway.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:36 PM.
Page 168 of 250 « First 68118158164165166167 168 169170171172178218 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.