![]() |
If Cain can get a 6 year deal when he hits FA, more power to him. I bet he gets max 4 unless it's structured team friendly, or his power hits the roof and you can slot him at right field. Still don't think that's likely.
|
The Royals are doing what they can do to be competitive now, and not handicap us for years down the road. Can't say I am complaining about anything they are doing.
|
Quote:
Yeah. I've long thought that Cain was someone you control until FA, get what you can, and say goodbye to. His game, even on offense, is so dependent on his legs, it seems very likely he will suffer a Carl Crawford-like fall once he starts to lose a step. |
Interesting story and stats on Ian Kennedy - http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/still...w-ian-kennedy/
A few slices from the story... Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
You let Cain walk. Get his best WAR years and say bye.
|
Quote:
That last sentence is hilarious. |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">ian kennedy, royals in agreement on $70M, 5-yr deal</p>— Jon Heyman (@JonHeyman) <a href="https://twitter.com/JonHeyman/status/688351171023470592">January 16, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> Done deal. |
Thoughts on Kennedy?
|
I like it because I think we had to have another arm with the question marks in the rotation and uncertainty about Zimmer/Almonte.
He's got decent peripherals. Should play up in our park and with our defense. Dude can log the innings and has been relatively injury free his entire career. So with all that being said, in today's free agency it's hard to HATE a deal that only pays a SP $14m/year. Has some upside to be a great contract but will likely be hard for it to be a terrible one. |
Kennedy is a great fit for KC but I did not expect him to get that much after that mediocre year in San Diego. The pitching market is out of control.
|
Quote:
|
Apparently the deal has an opt-out after year 2. Will be interesting to see the year by year numbers breakdown.
|
Quote:
|
I am complete.
Kennedy is a nice fit for KC in terms of park, as a flyball pitcher, and Eiland has worked with him a lot. He was very good from June on last year and is durable. Strengths: good changeup, misses a lot of bats. Improve his breaking ball last year and increased swing and misses from it, too. Actually kind of a lite version of James Shields in terms of stuff. He has been durable and is a fiery competitor. He did give up a lot of HR last year, especially on the first pitch. But that seems more like an anomaly than anything. Put him in front of this defense, in this park, and I think you like the results. This also will help bridge the gap in those post-2017 years. You're now looking to have ventura and Kennedy in the rotation through 2020. |
The Os just handed out 7/161M to Davis in what can only be considered to be the new version of the Ryan Howard contract. How long before they regret that one? Three years? Less?
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.