Thank you, sir.

From a statistics/combine point of view Lawrence Sidbury seems like an interesting prospect at DE.

6'2" 266lbs 4.64 (40), 35+ inch arms, 28 reps, improved each year in college putting up 11.5 sacks and 20TFL his senior year.

Anyone ever see him play at Richmond?

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cPydgMoTs04&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cPydgMoTs04&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Follow #2

Nice spin move at :54

Lawrence Sidbury, Richmond
Height: 6-4. Weight: 251.
Projected 40 Time: 4.75.
Combine 40 Time: 4.64.
Benchx225: . Vertical: 35.
Projected Round (2009): 3-4.
2/24/09: Even unofficially (the official times are obviously screwed up), Lawrence Sidbury ran one of the quickest 40s at the 2009 NFL Combine. He really helped himself on a day in which numerous defensive linemen disappointed.

1/9/09: An All-CAA First Team member, Lawrence Sidbury had 14.5 TFL and 6.5 sacks for national champion Richmond.

5/7/08: Lawrence Sidbury should be able to play in any scheme. He had eight tackles for loss and 4.5 sacks in 13 starts last season.

Compared to his other linemen he is quick off the snap. 3 sacks and some additional pressures in their championship game is pretty good.

Malcolm Jenkins is going to fall down some draft boards after his 4.6 40

No way! He's got positional value and supercedes everything.


PhilFree:arrow:

Funny thing about that is that he doesn't have positional value unlike what those guys have said. One CB drafted in the top 3 in the HISTORY of the NFL doesn't mean a CB is worth that pick. That's why it's funny to hear that argument against Curry.

I know but I couldn't help my self.


PhilFree:arrow:

Doesn't surprise me at all. I've always thought he was a better prospect at safety than at corner.

You're a ****ing dumbass.

If he ran a 4.45 and had a good day in drills, with his production, experience, and head, he'd be a shutdown corner.

No one on here is saying that ****ing Rhett Bomar is a top 15 pick because he's a QB.

FWIW, Willy Mo ran an unofficial 4.53. That's a good time for him.

:spock:

Is your post actually supposed to mean something? Honestly, I have no idea how to even respond to this as there is no sense in it at all.

Jenkins ran a 4.6 and looked stiff in drills. Are you saying he won't fall down boards?

Of course he's going to fall down boards.

I'm not the dumbass ventriloquizing others by saying that he won't because of positional value.

If you want to use a strawman, then shove it up your ass. It will probably help with the hemorrhoids.

You don't think his 40 time will effect his draft status? When I watch him play he looks like a S to me. I've read more then one place that if his 40s aren't fast teams will view him as a S prospect. As a CB he was being valued as a top 10 but as a S I bet he's not. I could be wrong I guess but I don't think so.


PhilFree:arrow: