Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5608244)

Those are 49ers colors. I used to like the 49ers, but come on. Have some pride in our Ronald McDonald stylings. We're here and we're queer!

Originally Posted by T-post Tom (Post 5608277)

It has nothing to do with an "inferiority complex." (And what do you care? Shouldn't you be hanging out somewhere on Hotel Street this time of day/evening?)

As I said before, the Chiefs were only "Texans" for 3 years. They've been the "Kansas City Chiefs" for over 40. The Chiefs were in the AFL longer than the Texans. The emblem is just a dumb idea.

Now if this whole thing was to honor the ORIGINS of the Chiefs, then you'd have an argument. BUT IT'S NOT: It's to honor the AFL. By doing this, you're telling the city and state that has supported the franchise for these many decades that the ONLY choice for a throwback uni includes a hemet emblem of another state that accounts for a tiny percentage of the franchise's history. I don't get that. We're not talking about the Tennessee Titans and Houston here. Come on now.

Hey, I'm not writing my congressman and I'm more concerned about the Chiefs winning a playoff game. Bit it's the thread topic and I think it's a stupid idea. That's all.

Originally Posted by T-post Tom (Post 5608277)

It has nothing to do with an "inferiority complex." (And what do you care? Shouldn't you be hanging out somewhere on Hotel Street this time of day/evening?)

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 5608322)

Now if they were keeping the Texas helmets for good, it'd be a big deal. So for 3 games they'll be known as the Kansas City Texas. Who the **** cares?

Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5608306)

Back when they were talking about field naming rights, I got so pissed that these jackoffs at the Turdalition would sell out the Arrowhead name, but God-Forbid we do a Uni Update, that I told them to, and I quote;

"Why don't you get on the phone to McDonalds you ****ing sell-outs, and tell them we'll be happy to change the name to McDickWeed Field, and don't forget to mention the greatest selling point of all; company colors built right in"!

LMAO

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 5608335)

My, aren't you testy. FYI, Hotel Street has been cleaned up a lot, it really isn't bad at all now.

The Chiefs have had essentially the same uniform since moving to KC. The logo is a little smaller on the helmets is the only change. Might as well not do it at all if we are just going to put a slightly larger emblem on the helmets. I think it is a great idea to wear the Texans uniforms. Hell, the Donks are wearing their much hated original uniforms, that is much worse than us having Texas on the helmet.

For the record, I've never liked Texas. But that is irrelevant here.

You appear to feel threatened by this, which sounds like an inferiority complex to me. Why else would you see it as an insult?

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 5608341)

I bet that really convinced them. ROFL

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5608348)

I like Texas. It's a state I'd gladly call home.

That said, can't say I'm crazy about having its likeness on my team's helmet.

Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5608356)

You didn't tell me you were living in Sudan! Have you learned to communicate with clicks and whistles yet? :D:Poke:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 5608355)

I'd actually be ok with the helmet change for 3 games if they keep away from the white on white uniforms. Every time Herm tried to rehash those, it was hell.

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5608360)

Clicks? Sorta.

My pump-action shotgun clicks.

And the resulting puckered assholes might whistle.

Originally Posted by Darth CarlSatan (Post 5608344)

He's got a relevant point.

The thing that bugs me about it, is that the Raiders will be the Oakland Raiders, The Broncos will be the Denver Broncos, the Chargers will be the San Diego Chargers, and who will WE BE again?