![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hmm. Given the choice between the two washed backs, yes I'd prefer McKinnon. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
For instance, McKinnon can chip but was best at 'absorbing' blitzers in pass pro. Hunt's just a bigger guy. Maybe if they intend to use someone to help Kingsley a little more, they want someone that is more likely to deliver a punch than absorb one. So in that regard, perhaps they just see Hunt, being the bigger and stronger back, as a slightly better fit. Because yeah, intuitively you would think McKinnon would get the call ahead of Hunt. If he isn't, there's a reason for it. |
Quote:
McKinnon's carries his 3 years with the Chiefs (from most recent): 21, 72, and 12. That is not what we need. We replaced McKinnon with Perine. We don't need another guy who excels on 3rd down but will break if we run him between the tackles too often. |
McKinnon hasn't been able to make it through a season in forever.
|
I don't think McKinnon wants to play anymore.
|
If Hunt is washed, it certainly isn't from overuse. He had, what, a season and a half as a feature back here before he got the boot for punting that chick?
Then he's out for a seasons worth of games give or take, then spends 4 years as a second fiddle behind Chubb and friends in Cleveland. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We missed you /s tag in your re-posting of a Twitter post... And took it at face value... |
We sign this piece of shit yet :)
|
Quote:
Because Hunt scored more TDs, averaged more YPC, had more yards per carry after contact, and was generally more effective than McKinnon. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.