So Colorado is going to be good because they return "alot"?

ISU is returning 17 of their 22 starters, that sounds like "alot" to me.

CU is returning 16 of 22 starters.

I'll put a sixer on ISU not winning the north. I'm betting NU wins it, since they play CU, KSU, and ISU at home. Take it?

And no, I did not attend K-State...you silly Cy-hawk! :)

16 < 17

Apparently, K-State has problems teaching math, too. :D

I figured 16 starters who won the Big XII north > 17 starters who choked and lost to a shitty Mizzou team, therefore NOT winning the Big XII north ;) They teach good fuzzy logic.

I'm not suggesting that Iowa State WILL win the North, just that they COULD and that they have just as good (if not better) chance as anybody else in an extremely shitty Big 12 North.

I think Colorado will win it. I'm guessing Nebraska will struggle to even finish in the top 50%, let alone win it.

16 starters that won 4 and lost 4 in the conference.

vs.

17 starters that won 4 and lost 4 in the conference.

Colorado SHARED the North title with Iowa State and went to the championship on a tiebreaker.

Fuzzy logic is insisting that 16 returning starters is a strength for Colorado but not for Iowa State.

Today's update added.

where?

Go Bo Go!

Thanks Parker.

surely he said Bo was having a good HALF camp..... ;)

Did I miss something or do ISU not contend for the Big 12 North title last season? IIRC, they were in it until the last game of the season. And they beat KSU in Manhattan, to boot. Not that I'm an ISU fan or anything but let's at least get our facts straight, KSU homers.

:D

Seriously, Bo has obviously looked good when he's in there. But right now, he's only practicing half of the time. That's not a good thing when he's over a year removed from ACL surgery.

In the original thread starter.