ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Go on record: What will make the Reid regime a success? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=274754)

DaneMcCloud 07-25-2013 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kysirsoze (Post 9833497)
Late in replying, but my point is winning all those playoff games in the 90's with no SB to show for it probably isn't a warm memory for most Bills fans. Better days than now, but still sour because they couldn't close the deal. Same as Philly under Reid.

I don't know, Man. That's quite a reach.

I know a diehard Bills fan out here and he's longing for the days of the early 90's.

I mean, why wouldn't you? How can anyone be bitter about watching Hall of Fame players every week that appear in four straight Super Bowls?

That's unprecedented and pretty freakin' awesome.

DaWolf 07-25-2013 01:07 PM

Until we get to a state of eliteness where the expectation is Super Bowl year in and year out (New England, Indy with Manning, Baltimore, SF right now), my vision of success would be divisional dominance and some playoff wins.

Andy Reid won the NFC East 6 times in 14 years (and finished 2nd 4 other times).

To give you some perspective, the Chiefs (Texans) have won the AFC West (or their division) 8 times in it's entire history (52 years)...

Frazod 07-25-2013 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 9833263)
Eventually, I'm going to expect play-off wins and SB appearances but, for now, I would settle for no longer looking like a bunch of reeruned monkeys on the field.

Yeah, being able to make it through the games I pay through the nose to watch would be a nice change.

milkman 07-25-2013 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9832987)
Especially when it's Marv and Bill Polian

I was pissed when the Chiefs fired Levy.
3 years of steady improvement, followed by a miserable strike shortened that Levy paid the price for.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9833428)
I didn't want him this year but he certainly would have been an improvement over Steadman and Schaaf back in the day.

Much of the foundation for Marty's early years, including '93' was laid by Schaaf.

Valiant 07-25-2013 04:13 PM

Sadly for true fans we only need to try hard and get 8-8. Maybe squeek a playoff spot once.

Realistically in this sad franchise a lowly playoff win.

To me. Superbowl appearance. Win would be icing.

MTG#10 07-25-2013 04:18 PM

Here's how beat down of a Chiefs fan I am: One ****ing playoff win is all I ask.

Dinny Bossa Nova 07-25-2013 04:23 PM

The Reid regime will be a smashing success when faced with the reality that they are unable to acquire Geno in a trade and there is no Andrew Luck or RGIII at their immediate disposal are successfully able to grunt three times and shit a franchise QB that is guaranteed to win the Super Bowl for the next fifteen years consecutively in a row that makes all other teams pretty much give up in advance when they examine our franchise QB's PFF stats very closely.

(ya, i know, if ya read it slowly....)

Then we'll obviously have a front office smarter than the Jets because Geno will so much rape faces this year.

Dinny

DJ's left nut 11-29-2022 09:37 AM

Man - we'd set the bar pretty low for Andy...

Vegas_Dave 11-29-2022 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dinny Bossa Nova (Post 9834102)
The Reid regime will be a smashing success when faced with the reality that they are unable to acquire Geno in a trade and there is no Andrew Luck or RGIII at their immediate disposal are successfully able to grunt three times and shit a franchise QB that is guaranteed to win the Super Bowl for the next fifteen years consecutively in a row that makes all other teams pretty much give up in advance when they examine our franchise QB's PFF stats very closely.

(ya, i know, if ya read it slowly....)

Then we'll obviously have a front office smarter than the Jets because Geno will so much rape faces this year.

Dinny

Awesome.

Bearcat 11-29-2022 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rasputin (Post 9830693)
Just win a Super Bowl. Is that too much to ask?


I'd be happy if we draft a quarterback that we can build a dominant team around for years to come. That would make success.

This seemed like such a pipe dream 10 years ago...

scho63 11-29-2022 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 9830384)
1. Find/acquire/develop an elite QB.
2. Build a dynasty that participates in and wins multiple SuperBowls.

Good take

scho63 11-29-2022 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9830386)
Playoffs this year
AFC Championship contender next year
Superbowl contender the rest of his tenure

Another good take

scho63 11-29-2022 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rasputin (Post 9830693)
Just win a Super Bowl. Is that too much to ask?


I'd be happy if we draft a quarterback that we can build a dominant team around for years to come. That would make success.

Came true

scho63 11-29-2022 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 9830981)
-Find a franchise QB
-At least an AFC Championship/SB appearance
-Drafting well and not leaving this team in shambles when he leaves/but that's part of Dorsey's job as well...prob more so his than Reid's.

Excellent

scho63 11-29-2022 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Predarat (Post 9831460)
winning more then one super bowl = A+ Success
winning a super bowl = A success
losing a super bowl = A-
AFC championship = B
Winning some playoff games = C
Winning A playoff game C-

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9831511)
ROFL

This team has had three playoff appearances in the past 15 years.

105 wins versus 138 loss (.314 winning percentage).

A playoff win is a C-?

Dane McDouche with another fail on his takes.
Guy thought he knew EVERYTHING about EVERYTHING and mocked everyone with name calling for not agreeing with him.

Good riddance.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.