ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs How does Dwayne Bowe rank among the elite WR's? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=261499)

Hammock Parties 07-20-2012 06:59 PM

I love the idea that Bowe won't rape this year.

We're gonna be passing more (barring our defense being top 5)

There's less pressure on Bowe because of the talent on offense.

We have an OC who shouldn't be in a retirement home.

His motivation is gonna be very high.

Dude is gonna beast the **** out.

Titty Meat 07-20-2012 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 8756642)
Reported
Posted via Mobile Device


Reported.

SAUTO 07-20-2012 07:01 PM

I think it's a given Bowe will have a great season.
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 07-20-2012 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8756658)
Reported.

Shut up bitch
Posted via Mobile Device

DaneMcCloud 07-20-2012 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8756647)
That's my point, man.

If Bowe doesn't light the world on fire this season, I bet they let him walk and sign a more affordable option that is still a quality player.

Steve Smith
Robert Meachem
Wes Welker
Mario Manningham
Plaxico Burress
Brandon Lloyd

My point is that these types of guys are available every single free agency period.

Sure, there are several 30+ year old WR's available each year on the downside of the careers. But, there are rarely 28 year old, extremely productive WR's looking for their second contracts available.

I'd take Dwayne Bowe any day of the week over those players, hands down. None are in the same league, per se.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8756647)
Let me take it a step further...

Let's say Bowe has a great year in 2012.

Would you rather:

A) Sign Bowe for the deal we are throwing around (8/100 with 45 guaranteed)

B) Tag Bowe and trade him for a first and the. Sign a "good" receiver to replace him.

If you remove yourself from your love for Red n Gold, the answer to that proposal should be easy.

Yes, it's easy: A.

Money isn't and should be an issue. The Chiefs have plenty of room under the salary cap, they can front load the first two years and in 2014, have an additional $18 million to play with. Bowe is young, productive and proven.

Secondly, I'd be shocked if any team gave up a first round pick for Bowe. I could see a late second but draft picks are just too valuable for most teams. For some teams, too valuable.

He should have been signed before July 15th.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-20-2012 07:03 PM

2 drops, he sucks/chiefsfootballfanakamultofsomeboredposter

BossChief 07-20-2012 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8756654)
I'm seeing a bunch of options that don't fit Bowe's role or who are old and could fall off a cliff at any moment.

The notion that anyone advocating the absolute necessity of re-signing Bowe is a homer is misguided.

What it breaks down to is this:

A) Bowe
B) Mario Manninham (or comparable player) + 1st round pick + significant amount of cap space that can be used elsewhere.

There is no question that b is the better option

Pasta Little Brioni 07-20-2012 07:07 PM

I'd rather have Bowe

DeezNutz 07-20-2012 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8756672)
What it breaks down to is this:

A) Bowe
B) Mario Manninham (or comparable player) + 1st round pick + significant amount of cap space that can be used elsewhere.

There is no question that b is the better option

Bull. Shit.

I don't give a **** about the mythical cap, and a single pick isn't enough compensation for Bowe.

RealSNR 07-20-2012 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8756684)
Bull. Shit.

I don't give a **** about the mythical cap, and a single pick isn't enough compensation for Bowe.

Go **** your mother, homer

RealSNR 07-20-2012 07:13 PM

Somebody should have told the Lions about that REALLY sweet deal they could have scored for Calvin Johnson. Imagine Vincent Jackson and Titus Young in that offense with extra draft picks and some extra cap room!

BossChief 07-20-2012 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8756684)
Bull. Shit.

I don't give a **** about the mythical cap, and a single pick isn't enough compensation for Bowe.

I was low balling the pick.

To me, I'd move Bowe for a first and a conditional pick and sign a replacement.

Then, you know what I'd do with my two first round picks?

jspchief 07-20-2012 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8756672)
What it breaks down to is this:

A) Bowe
B) Mario Manninham (or comparable player) + 1st round pick + significant amount of cap space that can be used elsewhere.

There is no question that b is the better option

Wait. Why is some other team willing to give up a first and meet Bowe's contract demands?

SAUTO 07-20-2012 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8756692)
Go **** your mother, homer

Go **** your grandmother, draftabulator
Posted via Mobile Device

RealSNR 07-20-2012 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 8756702)
Go **** your grandmother, draftabulator
Posted via Mobile Device

Go **** your great-grandmother, homerbulator

DaneMcCloud 07-20-2012 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8756672)
B) Mario Manninham (or comparable player) + 1st round pick + significant amount of cap space that can be used elsewhere.

Where?

Charles, Hali, DJ, Berry, Flowers, Winston, Baldwin, Breaston, Routt, Cassel (and soon, Poe) are locked up. Where will this "significant" cap space be spent? If it wasn't spent on Carr or Bowe, where will it go? We're talking double digit cap space this year and in 2013.

Apparently, the Chiefs are all well and good paying Bowe the $9 million+ Franchise tag. They just don't want to pony up a double digit signing bonus. Which leads us back to Clark Hunt's wallet.

BossChief 07-20-2012 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 8756701)
Wait. Why is some other team willing to give up a first and meet Bowe's contract demands?

Because teams like Miami, Titans, Rams and others need someone for their guys to throw to.

Their picks will be premium picks, too.

DaneMcCloud 07-20-2012 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8756714)
Because teams like Miami, Titans, Rams and others need someone for their guys to throw to.

Their picks will be premium picks, too.

I just don't buy it. If those teams weren't willing to trade for Bowe in 2012, I have a hard time believing they'll be willing in 2013.

I think the Chiefs could snag a late two and possibly an additional 5th or 6th, but not much more. Teams just aren't giving up high picks for veteran receivers.

Titty Meat 07-20-2012 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8756711)
Where?

Charles, Hali, DJ, Berry, Flowers, Winston, Baldwin, Breaston, Routt, Cassel (and soon, Poe) are locked up. Where will this "significant" cap space be spent? If it wasn't spent on Carr or Bowe, where will it go? We're talking double digit cap space this year and in 2013.

Apparently, the Chiefs are all well and good paying Bowe the $9 million+ Franchise tag. They just don't want to pony up a double digit signing bonus. Which leads us back to Clark Hunt's wallet.

**** you mother ****er clark hunt isnt cheap you stupid mother ****er

BossChief 07-20-2012 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8756711)
Where?

Charles, Hali, DJ, Berry, Flowers, Winston, Baldwin, Breaston, Routt, Cassel (and soon, Poe) are locked up. Where will this "significant" cap space be spent? If it wasn't spent on Carr or Bowe, where will it go? We're talking double digit cap space this year and in 2013.

Apparently, the Chiefs are all well and good paying Bowe the $9 million+ Franchise tag. They just don't want to pony up a double digit signing bonus. Which leads us back to Clark Hunt's wallet.

These are just the guys that come to mind...lots of them make next to nothing right now and will need a significant new contract in the next 2 or 3 years.

Albert
Dorsey
Houston

Asamoah
Bailey
Moeaki
Arenas

Plus, Ricky Stanzi is gonna need a 100 million dollar deal in two years!!!

DaneMcCloud 07-20-2012 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8756722)
Albert
Dorsey
Houston

Asamoah
Bailey
Moeaki
Arenas

Plus, Ricky Stanzi is gonna need a 100 million dollar deal in two years!!!

Dude, really?

Please explain how Dwayne Bowe's contract would affect Asamoah, Bailey, Moeaki, Arenas and Houston? Houston and Bailey are second year players! Moeaki was injured and who knows how long he'll stay healthy, Arenas is a 3rd CB at best. NONE will break the bank or even get close to it.

Anyone who "overspends" on Glen Dorsey should be fired immediately. He received Top 5 money when Top 5 money meant $50 million. And if Albert wants Top Tier left tackle money, he can look elsewhere. I like him quite a bit but he's hardly irreplaceable.

Same goes for Dorsey. Like him. Not irreplaceable.

BossChief 07-20-2012 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8756717)
I just don't buy it. If those teams weren't willing to trade for Bowe in 2012, I have a hard time believing they'll be willing in 2013.

I think the Chiefs could snag a late two and possibly an additional 5th or 6th, but not much more. Teams just aren't giving up high picks for veteran receivers.

What?

Brandon Marshall yielded 2 second rounders as a total malcontent...then yielded 2 third rounders this offseason after showing how little he cares about his own team.

If he can yield that, Bowe can pull at least a first.

If we can parlay Bowe into another first and use that to move up for a franchise quarterback, I'll help pack his bags and drive him to the airport.

That's coming from one of Bowes biggest fans on here.

DaneMcCloud 07-20-2012 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8756733)
What?

Brandon Marshall yielded 2 second rounders as a total malcontent...then yielded 2 third rounders this offseason after showing how little he cares about his own team.

If he can yield that, Bowe can pull at least a first.

If we can parlay Bowe into another first and use that to move up for a franchise quarterback, I'll help pack his bags and drive him to the airport.

That's coming from one of Bowes biggest fans on here.

I just don't see it. If that were the case, Bowe would have been before the draft. Don't you think a team like Cleveland would have been a prime contender, considering they just gave up 2013's second rounder for a malcontent mess?

DeezNutz 07-20-2012 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8756698)
I was low balling the pick.

To me, I'd move Bowe for a first and a conditional pick and sign a replacement.

Then, you know what I'd do with my two first round picks?

I know what you'd do, but I'm afraid that's not what Pioli would do.

There were similar conversations this off-season, and some floated the idea of offering Bowe + compensation to the Rams for the #2 overall pick and thus secure RGIII.

BossChief 07-20-2012 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8756732)
Dude, really?

Please explain how Dwayne Bowe's contract would affect Asamoah, Bailey, Moeaki, Arenas and Houston? Houston and Bailey are second year players! Moeaki was injured and who knows how long he'll stay healthy, Arenas is a 3rd CB at best. NONE will break the bank or even get close to it.

Anyone who "overspends" on Glen Dorsey should be fired immediately. He received Top 5 money when Top 5 money meant $50 million. And if Albert wants Top Tier left tackle money, he can look elsewhere. I like him quite a bit but he's hardly irreplaceable.

Same goes for Dorsey. Like him. Not irreplaceable.

I'm trying my best to play devils advocate.

I've said over and over that I think we should have signed Bowe to a 8/100/40-45.

Shit, I was the one who broke everything down a few days ago to come up with those figures by taking CJ and Fitz' production and taking the percentage Of those stats Bowe has accumulated and did the algebra required to come to the "educated guess contract" most are throwing around.

I guess I can understand both sides of this and why both are plausible, is all.

aturnis 07-21-2012 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8756666)

Money isn't and should be an issue. The Chiefs have plenty of room under the salary cap, they can front load the first two years and in 2014, have an additional $18 million to play with. Bowe is young, productive and proven.

You keep saying this, and it's simply not true...

Link

Quote:

Stagnant salary cap? Pretty much

Although revenues will soar in coming years, cap ceiling won't see significant hike

By John Clayton | ESPN.com

Perhaps the biggest surprise of the 2012 NFL owners meetings is the salary-cap projections.

Starting with the 2014 season, revenues are expected to rise significantly because of increased television dollars and the overall strength of the game. What won't rise much is the salary cap.

After having flat caps of $120.375 million in 2011 and $120.6 million in 2012, the NFL management council told clubs Tuesday that the cap won't increase much in the next three years. In fact, the 2015 cap may go up to only $122 million, according to management council projections.

Although the cap numbers for 2013, 2014 and 2015 still can be negotiated, projections point to very little increase. The cap may rise by only $300,000 in 2013, going to around $120.9 million. Even though increased network television money is coming in 2014, the cap is projected to go only into the $121-plus million range.

If that sounds amazing, consider this: The salary cap in 2009 was $123 million, higher than what is projected to be in 2015.

Where did all the salary-cap money go?

The answer resides in what has happened during the first two seasons of the new collective bargaining agreement. When the management council and the NFL Players Association ran the numbers from the percentage of money going to the players, the salary cap in 2011 was supposed to be less than $120 million. It could have been as low as around $116 million.

To put more salary money into free agency last season, the union was able to shift some of the benefit money into salary money. The result was a $120.375 million cap in 2011.

According to sources, the salary cap was supposed to be around $113.5 million this year. With 427 free agents, a huge cap decrease would have depressed the market and given almost too much contract leverage to teams. The union worked out a deal with the owners to trade off $7.1 million in benefit dollars per team from future years to have a $120.6 million salary cap.

What made things even more palatable for free agents was that approximately $283 million of unused cap dollars from 2011 was selectively rolled over into this year's cap. It's a plus for the players if teams roll over unused cap dollars into the next year, but eventually the flat caps would eat up the annual excess.

Already, it's causing teams to make tough decisions.

Look at the Houston Texans. Coming off their first playoff season, the Texans opted not to re-sign defensive end Mario Williams, cut right tackle Eric Winston and traded linebacker DeMeco Ryans. Instead, they chose to give long-term deals to running back Arian Foster and center Chris Myers.

"I think it's the NFL today; you've got to scout and make good decisions in terms of your contracts,'' Texans general manager Rick Smith said. "You can't afford to make mistakes. Anymore, you got to make sure you can evaluate the guys who fit your system and then go sign those guys. I think as you manage your cap and you manage your team, you got to figure who your core group of players are and keep those guys.''

Smith admits it's a challenge. Losing Williams, Winston and Ryans was tough.

"If we continue to draft well and develop our players that way, we are not going to be able to keep all our players,'' Smith said. "That's just a function of the system. You got to have confidence in the system. You have to have confidence to select the players that fit that you can continue to coach them up and develop them."

Smith came to meetings expecting a flat cap. So did Falcons general manager Thomas Dimitroff. "We are mindful of where the cap was going,'' Dimitroff said. "You have to plan ahead and be mindful that the cap could be flat. You just have to be creative in how you do deals.''

The Falcons made the tough choice of saying goodbye to middle linebacker Curtis Lofton for that reason. Lofton was hoping to get the $8-9 million-a-year deal given to the top inside linebackers in the league. Lofton was a leader of the defense, but he wasn't necessarily a linebacker who is great in coverages on passing downs.

Knowing the future impact of flat caps, the Falcons placed a financial limit to what they would offer Lofton. He opted to sign with the New Orleans Saints. They said goodbye to a former second-round pick who was labeled a success.

The Falcons also have to incorporate signing quarterback Matt Ryan to a contract extension. In a flat cap, there is only so much room for big-ticket contracts.

Players are still hoping for big salary-cap increases in 2014 and 2015, but the numbers aren't going in that direction. A flat cap means tougher negotiations for long-term deals.

DaneMcCloud 07-21-2012 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 8757467)
You keep saying this, and it's simply not true...

Great. John Clayton, once again, acting as a shill for the owners.

:hmmm:

In 2014, there will be an additional $1.2 billion in rights fees paid to the NFL. If the NFL doesn't share that money with the NFLPA, it's going to be a mess. The players most definitely expect the cap to rise in 2014.

BossChief 07-21-2012 11:09 AM

If the owners get more money and the split with the players is a direct percentage of the money the league makes...that means if they make more, the cap will go up.

If it doesnt, the owners are stealing more money from the players.

DaneMcCloud 07-21-2012 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8757561)
If the owners get more money and the split with the players is a direct percentage of the money the league makes...that means if they make more, the cap will go up.

If it doesnt, the owners are stealing more money from the players.

Yep. If Clayton's right and the owners try to pull the old "fuzzy math" trick, there's going to be some serious unrest on behalf of the NFLPA.

And despite of all that (2014), the Chiefs could have and should have signed Dwayne Bowe.

milkman 07-21-2012 11:18 AM

There are 5 chefs.

Four of them are given top notch quality ingredients and top of the line kitchens to prepare their meals.

One is given Spam, Top Ramen, a generic label mac and cheese and a hot plate to prepare his.

People come away from the first four meals impressed, as they should be.

People come away from the fifth meal and think, that chef did a damn fine job with the crap he had to work with, but he didn't prepare a gourmet meal.

Well, no shit.

Bowe is that fifth chef.

He has crap to work with, and yet he still does a damn fine job.

Give him the resources of the other 4, and he is right there with them.

So MicJones, you asked earlier in this thread, is Bowe worth a top 4 WR contract?

You damn right, he is.

aturnis 07-21-2012 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8757521)
In 2014, there will be an additional $1.2 billion in rights fees paid to the NFL. If the NFL doesn't share that money with the NFLPA, it's going to be a mess. The players most definitely expect the cap to rise in 2014.

Sounds like it's more about the wording in the collective bargaining agreement. If players get upset, it should be with their own lawyers.

Quote:

"I don't really see that happening," Kraft stated. "I don't think what happened in 2006 will happen in the future here, because if you understand the labor agreement and the long-term part of this, there will be a smooth growth. Anyone who assumes huge jumps, I hope they're in our division."

DaneMcCloud 07-21-2012 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 8757714)
Sounds like it's more about the wording in the collective bargaining agreement. If players get upset, it should be with their own lawyers.

You may be right. It seems like they signed on the dotted line without realizing that Roger Goodell is their judge, jury and executioner, so this may be another mistake by De Smith.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-24-2012 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toad King (Post 8748572)
What's Scott Pioli's W-L record?

Is it time for a pay cut?

LMAO Or just a cut? Seriously, does it take a genius to draft Eric Berry?

scho63 09-06-2012 11:05 AM

Just saw this posted today and if this is already posted but buried among the previous 93 pages I apologize.

According to ESPN Stats & Information, Bowe is second in the NFL on receiving the highest percentage of his team’s red zone targets in the past two seasons. He is ranked over than same time span in red zone receiving touchdowns.

vailpass 09-06-2012 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 8883310)
Just saw this posted today and if this is already posted but buried among the previous 93 pages I apologize.

According to ESPN Stats & Information, Bowe is second in the NFL on receiving the highest percentage of his team’s red zone targets in the past two seasons. He is ranked over than same time span in red zone receiving touchdowns.

So he's been the only target Cassell has thrown to in the RZ for 2 years? Not sure how to interpret this?

Rausch 09-06-2012 11:08 AM

I'd put him at about the 8-11 range...

Chiefnj2 09-06-2012 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 8883310)
Just saw this posted today and if this is already posted but buried among the previous 93 pages I apologize.

According to ESPN Stats & Information, Bowe is second in the NFL on receiving the highest percentage of his team’s red zone targets in the past two seasons. He is ranked over than same time span in red zone receiving touchdowns.

Makes sense. There hasn't been any other receiver playing on the team the last two years.

No Breaston in 2010. No Moeaki in 2011.

Black Bob 09-06-2012 11:23 AM

Quote:

How does Dwayne Bowe rank among the elite WR's?
He doesn't rank amoung the elite receivers imo. He's not elite. The rest of those guys make the play when the game is on the line and the team needs it most. Bowe does not. He mostly just schools shitty WRs like Powers last year in Indy. He's a good receiver but is no where near great imo.

Deberg_1990 09-06-2012 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8883359)
He doesn't rank amoung the elite receivers imo. He's not elite. The rest of those guys make the play when the game is on the line and the team needs it most. Bowe does not. He mostly just schools shitty WRs like Powers last year in Indy. He's a good receiver but is no where near great imo.

Heh, I always get a chuckle when guys say stuff like this. Those guys drop passes and make mistakes to. Fans tend to critque and be harder on their own teams guys than they are on players from other teams.

ThaVirus 09-06-2012 11:53 AM

I had three different guys argue that Desean Jackson is better than Dwayne Bowe.

****ing preposterous.

ToxSocks 09-06-2012 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 8883432)
I had three different guys argue that Desean Jackson is better than Dwayne Bowe.

****ing preposterous.

Stupid people correlate Speed to skill.

BigMeatballDave 09-06-2012 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8883359)
I'm a semen chugging troll.

Fixed

Black Bob 09-06-2012 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8883380)
Heh, I always get a chuckle when guys say stuff like this. Those guys drop passes and make mistakes to. Fans tend to critque and be harder on their own teams guys than they are on players from other teams.

Yep but, they catch the big ones. Bowe has dropped some big ones. It's definately part of the reason he doesn't have a new contract.

Deberg_1990 09-06-2012 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8883459)
Yep but, they catch the big ones. Bowe has dropped some big ones. It's definately part of the reason he doesn't have a new contract.

Did you miss Welkers drop in the Super Bowl last year that would have sealed the game for the Pats?

Black Bob 09-06-2012 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8883470)
Did you miss Welkers drop in the Super Bowl last year that would have sealed the game for the Pats?

I saw it and he doesn't have a contract either. LMAO

No, just kidding, it's obviously alot more than that. Welker has beaten Revis one on one in big games. Bowe has always struggled against good corners. Cromartie used to make fun of him, Asamough shut him down, and Champ has almost always gotten the best of him (except for the game they were killing u at halftime and the d-coordinator started pulling the corners way off the line).

BigMeatballDave 09-06-2012 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8883459)
Yep but, they catch the big ones. Bowe has dropped some big ones. It's definately part of the reason he doesn't have a new contract.

We're you conceived in a crackhouse?

MrNightly 09-06-2012 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8883492)
We're you conceived in a crackhouse?

You have serious issues, don't you?

Are you 15 years old? If you don't like somebody, feel free to keep it to yourself. Wow. The immaturity of this board never ceases to amaze me.

ThaVirus 09-06-2012 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 8883443)
Stupid people correlate Speed to skill.

Pretty much this. He plays for a better, more marketable team. Plus he's fast so his 75+ yard TDs are more likely to make SportsCenter.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8883485)
I saw it and he doesn't have a contract either. LMAO

No, just kidding, it's obviously alot more than that. Welker has beaten Revis one on one in big games. Bowe has always struggled against good corners. Cromartie used to make fun of him, Asamough shut him down, and Champ has almost always gotten the best of him (except for the game they were killing u at halftime and the d-coordinator started pulling the corners way off the line).

That's because he plays with shitty QBs that either can't thread the needle or don't even try unless he's wide open by at least two steps. "Open" by Cassel/Huard/Palko/Thigpen standards is not the same as NFL "open".

Rausch 09-06-2012 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Rico (Post 8883500)
Wow. The immaturity of this board never ceases to amaze me.

It's like Chicken Pox...

BigMeatballDave 09-06-2012 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Rico (Post 8883500)
You have serious issues, don't you?

Are you 15 years old? If you don't like somebody, feel free to keep it to yourself. Wow. The immaturity of this board never ceases to amaze me.

I don't respond intelligently to trolls like Black Bob.

Are you a troll or a moron?

MrNightly 09-06-2012 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8883515)
I don't respond intelligently to trolls like Black Bob.

Are you a troll or a moron?

Neither.

So why exactly is Black Bob a troll? Because he has a different opinion then you? Hmmm...

BigMeatballDave 09-06-2012 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Rico (Post 8883580)
Neither.

So why exactly is Black Bob a troll? Because he has a different opinion then you? Hmmm...

You're a moron.

CoMoChief 09-06-2012 12:59 PM

I wouldn't rank him with the elite's.....but I'd rank him along the likes of Brandon Marshall, Miles Austin, and Vincent Jackson.

the Talking Can 09-06-2012 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Rico (Post 8883500)
You have serious issues, don't you?

Are you 15 years old? If you don't like somebody, feel free to keep it to yourself. Wow. The immaturity of this board never ceases to amaze me.

i'm peeing on your mom from a hot air balloon while holding a boom box blasting Skrillex...

MrNightly 09-06-2012 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8883607)
You're a moron.

And I appreciate your opinion. And thoughtful, well-written reply to the question raised.

Have a nice life.

Go Chiefs!

BigMeatballDave 09-06-2012 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 8883613)
i'm peeing on your mom from a hot air balloon while holding a boom box blasting Skrillex...

LMAO

RealSNR 09-06-2012 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackBob (Post 8883459)
Yep but, they catch the big ones. Bowe has dropped some big ones. It's definately part of the reason he doesn't have a new contract.

You know who was known league-wide as a notorious pass dropper for a large stretch of his career?

Jerry. ****ing. Rice.

And it didn't stop after the initial plague of drops at the beginning of his career. Joe Montana got injured, then left, and Rice started dropping shit AGAIN for a couple seasons with Steve Young.

Don't tell me "great" WRs don't drop passes. And let's not pretend that the Ricky Proehls and Joe Jureviciouses out there who catch everything thrown their way are any good, because they're not.

vailpass 09-06-2012 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 8883432)
I had three different guys argue that Desean Jackson is better than Dwayne Bowe.

****ing preposterous.

You'd take Bowe over D. Jackson?

RealSNR 09-06-2012 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8883862)
You'd take Bowe over D. Jackson?

All hail Trollius Maximus!

vailpass 09-06-2012 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8883865)
All hail Trollius Maximus!

Not at all. Asking a serious question. Try to look at it as a football fan that is not a fan of any particular team and see what you think.

RealSNR 09-06-2012 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8883876)
Not at all. Asking a serious question. Try to look at it as a football fan that is not a fan of any particular team and see what you think.

Bowe is a better and more valuable WR to a team than DeSean Jackson. Yes.

O.city 09-06-2012 02:53 PM

After Jackson got his dic knocked off a year or two ago, he's basically a deep threat only.

vailpass 09-06-2012 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8883878)
Bowe is a better and more valuable WR to a team than DeSean Jackson. Yes.

Depends on what you need. I like Jackson's speed, route running, average ypc, and break away threat. Plus I think he's a couple years younger.
Bowe is nice but you act like we're comparing Jackson to Megatron.
We aren't.

O.city 09-06-2012 03:13 PM

Jackson isn't a good route runner. He's a deep threat. Thats about it.

RealSNR 09-06-2012 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8883959)
Depends on what you need. I like Jackson's speed, route running, average ypc, and break away threat. Plus I think he's a couple years younger.
Bowe is nice but you act like we're comparing Jackson to Megatron.
We aren't.

Jackson's a speedy mother, but he's far from a great route runner. Bowe is far better at that than Jackson.

I don't get why Bowe has to be Megatron to be better than Jackson. Bowe is slower, and that's about the only advantage Jackson has. Well, that and QB obviously.

vailpass 09-06-2012 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8883965)
Jackson isn't a good route runner. He's a deep threat. Thats about it.

He runs a damn good deep route. Again, it depends on what your team needs. I like Jackson as a true threat WR. Reasonable minds can disagree but to say there isn't a discussion is homeriffic. Granted, this is a KC board and it is your right to be homers here.

O.city 09-06-2012 03:20 PM

I just don't see him as a true threat WR. He's a deep threat. Same with Mike Wallace.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-06-2012 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8883996)
He runs a damn good deep route. Again, it depends on what your team needs. I like Jackson as a true threat WR. Reasonable minds can disagree but to say there isn't a discussion is homeriffic. Granted, this is a KC board and it is your right to be homers here.

The only sanctioned homerism here is from Bronco fans, you know this.

vailpass 09-06-2012 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8884003)
I just don't see him as a true threat WR. He's a deep threat. Same with Mike Wallace.

Fair response. I like Mike Wallace too.

vailpass 09-06-2012 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8884044)
The only sanctioned homerism here is from Bronco fans, you know this.

Maybe on the Mane or in the KnowMo thread. I hope I've made it clear through the years that I recognize my status here as rival visitor and respect that this is a Chiefs board.

O.city 09-06-2012 03:38 PM

I like Wallace alot more, to be honest.

BigMeatballDave 09-06-2012 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8883996)
He runs a damn good deep route. Again, it depends on what your team needs. I like Jackson as a true threat WR. Reasonable minds can disagree but to say there isn't a discussion is homeriffic. Granted, this is a KC board and it is your right to be homers here.

LMAO a donkey fan talking about homerism.

O.city 09-06-2012 03:39 PM

Nah, Valipass is a Bronco, but he's a good dude.

vailpass 09-06-2012 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8884077)
I like Wallace alot more, to be honest.

Oh yeah. More complete and tougher too IMHO.

BigMeatballDave 09-06-2012 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8883862)
You'd take Bowe over D. Jackson?

Would you take Jackson over Thomas?

RealSNR 09-06-2012 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8883996)
He runs a damn good deep route.

Ehhhhh... it's good. It's not damn good or great.

Might just have to do with preferences, but I really don't see how you can look at a receiver like Bowe who makes the plays that he does with such garbage rapeshit for his QB and pass over him for a TRUE diva (wanna talk character problems in WRs FFS?) who doesn't really do anything more than streak past coverage and does a good job of putting his body in a position to make a good catch.

How many guys are there in the NFL just like DeSean Jackson? Mike Wallace, Torrey Smith, Percy Harvin, Delirium Tremens, to some extent Greg Jennings, Santonio Holmes, Pierre Garcon, Kenny Britt... they're ****ing everywhere.

How many guys are there in the NFL who do what Bowe does in terms of big bodies who have the ability to make the highlight reel catch? Teams draft these kinds of players all the time but rarely do they work as well as the guys who do what DeSean Jackson does. Calvin Johnson, Andre Johnson, Brandon Marshall, Anquan Boldin, I suppose one would put Justin Blackmon into this category if he works out... really aren't that many.

Then again you have the guys that certainly cross both types. Those kinds are even fewer. Larry Fitzgerald and (maybe) Julio Jones are the only ones I can think of at the moment still in the NFL who do that. At one point in the NFL there was no question that Randy Moss was the best in the business because he did it all so goddamn well, but now that's not really the case any more.

vailpass 09-06-2012 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8884078)
LMAO a donkey fan talking about homerism.

I got your homer right here Marge.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-06-2012 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8884085)
Nah, Valipass is a Bronco, but he's a good dude.

Yeah, he's a realist too. Wasn't talking about him earlier.

vailpass 09-06-2012 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8884094)
Ehhhhh... it's good. It's not damn good or great.

Might just have to do with preferences, but I really don't see how you can look at a receiver like Bowe who makes the plays that he does with such garbage rapeshit for his QB and pass over him for a TRUE diva (wanna talk character problems in WRs FFS?) who doesn't really do anything more than streak past coverage and does a good job of putting his body in a position to make a good catch.

How many guys are there in the NFL just like DeSean Jackson? Mike Wallace, Torrey Smith, Percy Harvin, Delirium Tremens, to some extent Greg Jennings, Santonio Holmes, Pierre Garcon, Kenny Britt... they're ****ing everywhere.

How many guys are there in the NFL who do what Bowe does in terms of big bodies who have the ability to make the highlight reel catch? Teams draft these kinds of players all the time but rarely do they work as well as the guys who do what DeSean Jackson does. Calvin Johnson, Andre Johnson, Brandon Marshall, Anquan Boldin, I suppose one would put Justin Blackmon into this category if he works out... really aren't that many.

Then again you have the guys that certainly cross both types. Those kinds are even fewer. Larry Fitzgerald and (maybe) Julio Jones are the only ones I can think of at the moment still in the NFL who do that. At one point in the NFL there was no question that Randy Moss was the best in the business because he did it all so goddamn well, but now that's not really the case any more.

Solid points, agreed on the different types of WR. The trick is to get a mix. the year we had B Marsh with Royal underneath and Cutler slinging to them was a good mix.
Oh, there's another thing. No matter who the WR is they aren't shit without the ball getting to them.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.