ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Knowmo's Homer Thread (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=274917)

MagicHef 10-21-2013 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10112841)
So that one Trindon Holliday fumble led to 33 points before the 4th quarter?

That was some fumble!

You guys are pros at missing the point. First rate. Truly incredible.

I'm not saying that Denver" should have won, oh they were so close!" I'm saying that the offense and special teams made multiple game-changing mistakes throughout the game, while by comparison, the defense did not have the same type of mistakes, and taking into account the mistakes made by the other parts of the team, played a relatively good game. If your only response is "but look at all the points" then we can probably stop wasting our time discussing it.

ThaVirus 10-21-2013 11:31 PM

Short field or not, your defense wilted when it mattered and allowed TDs instead of field goals at critical points in the game.

On top of that, players that were supposed to make an impact defensively were basically invisible. See: Von Miller and Champ Bailey.

MagicHef 10-21-2013 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10112881)

Nantz and Simms bothered me on this play. They kept looking at his hair and shoulders to try to determine if he was out of bounds, completely ignoring the fact that Chris Clark is touching out of bounds and touching Walden, making him out of bounds, well before the ball was recovered.

MagicHef 10-21-2013 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 10112954)
Short field or not, your defense wilted when it mattered and allowed TDs instead of field goals at critical points in the game.

On top of that, players that were supposed to make an impact defensively were basically invisible. See: Von Miller and Champ Bailey.

When it mattered most? They held Indy to 102 yards and a single TD in the second half.

Hammock Parties 10-21-2013 11:34 PM

What bothered me about that play was the lack of blood from Manning.

ThaVirus 10-21-2013 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10112959)
When it mattered most? They held Indy to 102 yards and a single TD in the second half.

I actually didn't say "most" and I was referring mostly to the first half. Your defense gave up TDs instead of field goals consistently and allowed the Colts to steamroll through you for, what, a 12 point lead at half? If I remember correctly they had 30 points heading into half time?

Ceej 10-21-2013 11:52 PM

OP needs updated.

-King- 10-22-2013 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10112847)
If Trent Richardson doesn't fumble in the 4th quarter, the Broncos don't get a short field, don't kick the field goal, and only put up 23 points on the night

/alternate universe MagicHef

LMAO

-King- 10-22-2013 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10112955)
Nantz and Simms bothered me on this play. They kept looking at his hair and shoulders to try to determine if he was out of bounds, completely ignoring the fact that Chris Clark is touching out of bounds and touching Walden, making him out of bounds, well before the ball was recovered.

What? That's not the way football works.

RealSNR 10-22-2013 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10112951)
You guys are pros at missing the point. First rate. Truly incredible.

I'm not saying that Denver" should have won, oh they were so close!" I'm saying that the offense and special teams made multiple game-changing mistakes throughout the game, while by comparison, the defense did not have the same type of mistakes, and taking into account the mistakes made by the other parts of the team, played a relatively good game. If your only response is "but look at all the points" then we can probably stop wasting our time discussing it.

No. YOU'RE missing the point. I know you're not saying that. I'm not trying to make that point. I'm trying to say your defense is dogshit.

You pointed to turnovers leading to short fields for the Colts offense to score those 33 points. I pointed to only one of them that actually led to a TD when the Colts started on your side of the field.

You know what? You're right. It doesn't matter. Your defense sucks balls.

SPchief 10-22-2013 01:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10112955)
Nantz and Simms bothered me on this play. They kept looking at his hair and shoulders to try to determine if he was out of bounds, completely ignoring the fact that Chris Clark is touching out of bounds and touching Walden, making him out of bounds, well before the ball was recovered.

Care to expand on that? It's a live ball

Mother****erJones 10-22-2013 06:36 AM

Orakpo and Kerrigan are coming to wreck that ass

MagicHef 10-22-2013 06:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10113040)
No. YOU'RE missing the point. I know you're not saying that. I'm not trying to make that point. I'm trying to say your defense is dogshit.

You pointed to turnovers leading to short fields for the Colts offense to score those 33 points. I pointed to only one of them that actually led to a TD when the Colts started on your side of the field.

You know what? You're right. It doesn't matter. Your defense sucks balls.

10 points came on drives when the Colts started on their side of the field.

27 points came from when they didn't.

2 points came from the safety.

I guess the starting position only matters when it comes from a turnover, though?

Mother****erJones 10-22-2013 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10113177)
10 points came on drives when the Colts started on their side of the field.

27 points came from when they didn't.

2 points came from the safety.

I guess the starting position only matters when it comes from a turnover, though?

The ****ing cowboys hung 48 on you. And the JAGUARS scored 19 ROFL


Ps is champ bailey done?

MagicHef 10-22-2013 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10113005)
What? That's not the way football works.

Yes it does.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 10113045)
Care to expand on that? It's a live ball

Anything touching out of bounds is fully out of bounds. Therefore, Clark is fully out of bounds when his hand touches the white. Walden is touching Clark, and is also out of bounds. If doesn't matter that the ball is live. If Clark were not there and Walden recovered the ball while it was in bounds, but a part of Walden's body was out, the ball is then out.

Rausch 10-22-2013 06:53 AM

You got a glimpse at the open maw of your future and you are afraid.

Don't ****ing stare a dog down if you aren't willing to get bit...

FlaChief58 10-22-2013 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10113177)
10 points came on drives when the Colts started on their side of the field.

27 points came from when they didn't.

2 points came from the safety.

I guess the starting position only matters when it comes from a turnover, though?

All this tells us is that the donkeys led by the forehead will fail (as usual) when faced with a good D that can smother wide recievers and smack him in the mouth.

Mother****erJones 10-22-2013 06:55 AM

I hope it's snowing for our games

Rausch 10-22-2013 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flachief58 (Post 10113186)
All this tells us is that the donkeys led by the forehead will fail (as usual) when faced with a good D that can smother wide recievers and smack him in the mouth.

It's his MO.

It's what he does.

Rausch 10-22-2013 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10113187)
I hope it's snowing for our games

I don't.

I just hope it's super-****-you-cold...

notorious 10-22-2013 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10113187)
I hope it's snowing glaciers for our games in 50 mph wind

Expanded your post.

The Bad Guy 10-22-2013 07:47 AM

This is cute all the Bronco lemmings defending their garbage d. Reminds me of 2003.

DaFace 10-22-2013 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10113184)
Yes it does.



Anything touching out of bounds is fully out of bounds. Therefore, Clark is fully out of bounds when his hand touches the white. Walden is touching Clark, and is also out of bounds. If doesn't matter that the ball is live. If Clark were not there and Walden recovered the ball while it was in bounds, but a part of Walden's body was out, the ball is then out.

I'm pretty sure you're a little off on that, but I can't say that with 100% confidence. By that logic, there could be a string of guys holding hands, and they'd call the ball OOB at midfield.

You're definitely correct that a player OOB touching the BALL is considered to be out, but I've never heard that an OOB player touching an in-bounds player makes the in-bounds player OOB.

MagicHef 10-22-2013 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 10113263)
I'm pretty sure you're a little off on that, but I can't say that with 100% confidence. By that logic, there could be a string of guys holding hands, and they'd call the ball OOB at midfield.

You're definitely correct that a player OOB touching the BALL is considered to be out, but I've never heard that an OOB player touching an in-bounds player makes the in-bounds player OOB.

I'm going off of memory, but I'm about 90% sure. It happened, and was explained that way, in a Broncos game a few years ago.

notorious 10-22-2013 07:56 AM

Nope.


Players have touched the ball runner while standing OB a million times and the runner is not called out.

RunKC 10-22-2013 08:06 AM

Elway better hope and pray that Manning gets him a ring bc he hasn't done shit to build that team. Without Manning they are 4-12.

Honestly, aside from the layup draft pick of Von Miller, he really hasn't done that much. Weaker came bc if Manning, not Elway

Pasta Little Brioni 10-22-2013 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Von Dumbass (Post 10112279)
The defense played pretty well, they were just put into bad spots. We had two turnovers inside our own 20 yard line, we gave the Colts great field position all game and even had a safety. The defense actually kept us in the game but the ball just didn't bounce our way.

Another embarrasing excuse...pathetic

Pasta Little Brioni 10-22-2013 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10112813)
Ha ha, no. That doesn't make sense anyway, he has more INTs than Manning. You can keep Smith, forever and ever.

What I'm saying is that if Holiday doesn't fumble, we have a good shot at winning. If Hillman doesn't fumble, we have a good shot at winning. If neither fumble, we likely win easily. Obviously, that's not what happened, though.

Why aren't you counting the 80 yards more Indy would have had if Luck wouldn't have missed an easy TD to Wayne? How embarrasing would giving up 46 on National TV have been ROFLThat is more fluky than a slapdick RB fumbling.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-22-2013 08:45 AM

What is RG3 going to do this week? He's getting back into form and faces a D that Henne feasted on.

mr. tegu 10-22-2013 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 10113330)
Why aren't you counting the 80 yards more Indy would have had if Luck wouldn't have missed an easy TD to Wayne? How embarrasing would giving up 46 on National TV have been ROFLThat is more fluky than a slapdick RB fumbling.

Plus two other 50 yard dropped TD passes.

mr. tegu 10-22-2013 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10113184)
Yes it does.



Anything touching out of bounds is fully out of bounds. Therefore, Clark is fully out of bounds when his hand touches the white. Walden is touching Clark, and is also out of bounds. If doesn't matter that the ball is live. If Clark were not there and Walden recovered the ball while it was in bounds, but a part of Walden's body was out, the ball is then out.

Yeah this isn't correct. You must also think Decker's ball in the front corner of the endzone was a touchdown also.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-22-2013 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu (Post 10113377)
Plus two other 50 yard dropped TD passes.

JFC they are awful

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-22-2013 09:11 AM

You may now begin addressing Hef as "Peytons Prostate". We are WINNING this goddamned division.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-22-2013 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 10113391)
You may now begin addressing Hef as "Peytons Prostate". We are WINNING this goddamned division.

You're god damned right

loochy 10-22-2013 09:24 AM

http://www.sportsgrid.com/nfl/despit...rm-looks-weak/

Despite What Peyton Manning Says, His Arm Looks Weak And It Could Be A Major Issue
by Eric Goldschein | 12:06 pm, October 21st, 2013

The Broncos finally lost last night — to the Colts, of all teams. Perhaps it was the emotion of Peyton Manning returning to Indianapolis, or the fact that Andrew Luck played like an absolute stud, but at the end of the day, the Broncos lost and a loss is a loss.

If you didn’t watch the game, you might think that, on paper, Peyton Manning played extremely well, while his offense line failed to protect him at critical junctures and his team got called for tons of stupid penalties that amounted to over 100 yards lost. This is, to a point, not false: Manning had almost 400 yards and threw for 3 TDs, and you can’t argue with those numbers.

But his arm looked, in a word, terrible. Particularly after Robert Mathis got to Manning, hit him during his windup, and forced a safety (via @jose3030):
http://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net...gif?1382319793

Manning’s passes were often under-thrown, and no pass over 10 yards had anything resembling a spiral to it. Thankfully for Manning, he has an incredibly talented receiving corps that made some fantastic plays on his poor balls, like Demaryius Thomas did here (via GIFD Sports):

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Go9mkWJjMB...thomastdgt.gif

Or like Eric Decker did here:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-VdUxbVAdbH...s400/djugg.gif

The Colts secondary was also depleted by injuries by the fourth quarter, and mostly played a prevent defense to protect their large lead (which they almost gave up, but were bailed out by Ronnie Hillman’s red zone fumble). Basically, Manning lucked (no pun intended) out.

The fact that the Broncos almost still won this game is a testament to their talent and skill. They’re still an elite team. But the shine is coming off Peyton Manning after he started the season blazing hot. Despite what his teammates might say, NFL insiders testify that his arm strength isn’t nearly what it used to be. And if you think a 37-year old with neck issues is going to get stronger as the weeks pile up, you’re clearly a Broncos fan.

The Broncos have their toughest stretch of schedule coming up, with two games against the Chiefs in a three week span and a game in Foxboro in between them. And come playoff time — Manning’s long-time Achilles heel — the Broncos will face nothing but quality teams. It’s doubtful that the kind of passes Manning threw for touchdowns last night will end up in his teammates hands with the same regularity as they did yesterday.

After the game, Manning was asked about his arm strength issues, to which he replied: “I throw a lot of wobbly passes. I throw a lot of wobbly touchdowns, too.” Oh, snap, he done told us. But seriously, those wobbly passes will become wobbly interceptions if he keeps throwing them at this rate (read: every time he throws). Besides an undisciplined defense and ball security issues (both fixable), Manning’s arm could end up being the Broncos undoing.

MagicHef 10-22-2013 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 10113391)
You may now begin addressing Hef as "Peytons Prostate". We are WINNING this goddamned division.

No, that happens when you actually win the division, not when you go up by one game in October, with 5 division games still to play.

loochy 10-22-2013 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10113411)
No, that happens when you actually win the division, not when you go up by one game in October, with 5 division games still to play.

NO WTF WE ALREADY WON THE SUPERBOWL IN SPITE OF AXL SMIF AND ERIC FISHER

ThaVirus 10-22-2013 09:31 AM

While we're tearing the Broncos a new asshole, how much of a pussy is Eric Decker? He LITERALLY looked for a flag on every ****ing pass he didn't catch on Sunday night. There was even one time he was throwing his hands up to draw a flag while the ball landed 5 feet from him. Had he attempted to make the catch instead of being a little crybaby bitch, that would have had a real chance of being a completion.

I ****ing hate that guy.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-22-2013 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 10113427)
While we're tearing the Broncos a new asshole, how much of a pussy is Eric Decker? He LITERALLY looked for a flag on every ****ing pass he didn't catch on Sunday night. There was even one time he was throwing his hands up to draw a flag while the ball landed 5 feet from him. Had he attempted to make the catch instead of being a little crybaby bitch, that would have had a real chance of being a completion.

I ****ing hate that guy.

He could have caught a ball, but bitched instead. I am going to refer to him as Euro. He is nothing without Manning and still swings the smallest, most vanillaest penis in the West.

ThaVirus 10-22-2013 09:35 AM

On a side note, I gained a shit ton of respect for Demaryius Thomas during that game. He NEVER whined and cried for flag help despite some physical, press coverage from Vontae all game.

I do wonder, though, if our guys will get those calls when we play them.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-22-2013 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 10113441)
On a side note, I gained a shit ton of respect for Demaryius Thomas during that game. He NEVER whined and cried for flag help despite some physical, press coverage from Vontae all game.

I do wonder, though, if our guys will get those calls when we play them.

I have no respect for Tremens at all. Beat him the **** up....and I think you know the answer to that question.

Rausch 10-22-2013 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 10113441)
On a side note, I gained a shit ton of respect for Demaryius Thom...

Here's where you STFU and lay down...

http://img5.joyreactor.com/pics/post...ape-655405.gif

Pasta Little Brioni 10-22-2013 09:46 AM

http://makeameme.org/media/created/The-160-Broncos.jpg

Pasta Little Brioni 10-22-2013 09:53 AM

Uh-Oh...Time to update the OP :)

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/powerrankings

Rausch 10-22-2013 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 10113472)

LMAO

loochy 10-22-2013 10:02 AM

uh wtf, that jacked up the page

RealSNR 10-22-2013 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10113411)
No, that happens when you actually win the division, not when you go up by one game in October, with 5 division games still to play.

Look, as far as I'm concerned, I still think the Broncos are the best team in the NFL. I'm just trying to get you to be a man and admit that your defense sucks balls.

You appear to be incapable of doing that.

That's Knowmo bullshit, dude. You're better than that.

ThaVirus 10-22-2013 10:18 AM

Good job, loochy. You broke the internet.

Pablo 10-22-2013 10:20 AM

So, I'm guessing turd dick hasn't showed up yet to take his lumps?

RealSNR 10-22-2013 10:20 AM

It's Knowmo's fault

loochy 10-22-2013 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 10113578)
Good job, loochy. You broke the internet.

http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instanc...0/35356976.jpg

Pablo 10-22-2013 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 10113586)

Obama + KnowMo = CP's very own Satan!

MagicHef 10-22-2013 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10113559)
Look, as far as I'm concerned, I still think the Broncos are the best team in the NFL. I'm just trying to get you to be a man and admit that your defense sucks balls.

You appear to be incapable of doing that.

That's Knowmo bullshit, dude. You're better than that.

Against the Cowboys, they were terrible. Against the Ravens, Giants, Raiders, and Jaguars, they were bad. Against the Eagles and Colts, I felt they were ok. The difference was the offense having 7 drives in a row for a total of 23 yards and a safety.

mr. tegu 10-22-2013 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10113598)
Against the Cowboys, they were terrible. Against the Ravens, Giants, Raiders, and Jaguars, they were bad. Against the Eagles and Colts, I felt they were ok. The difference was the offense having 7 drives in a row for a total of 23 yards and a safety.

Completely irrelevant. If Denver ended up winning that wouldn't have changed that the defense sucked and does suck. Teams aren't going to go 50 yards or more for a score on every drive.

If you consider OK to be giving up 39 points, then you probably aren't capable of admitting the defense sucks.

MagicHef 10-22-2013 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu (Post 10113644)
Completely irrelevant. If Denver ended up winning that wouldn't have changed that the defense sucked and does suck. Teams aren't going to go 50 yards or more for a score on every drive.

If you consider OK to be giving up 39 points, then you probably aren't capable of admitting the defense sucks.

Weird. I heard completely different things when Cassel was in KC.

RealSNR 10-22-2013 10:45 AM

Somehow the Chiefs have been able to hold their opponents to field goals when they turn the ball over in their own territory.

I wonder what gives.

MagicHef 10-22-2013 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10113651)
Somehow the Chiefs have been able to hold their opponents to field goals when they turn the ball over in their own territory.

I wonder what gives.

Uh, they have a better defense. I think that's clear.

RealSNR 10-22-2013 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10113649)
Weird. I heard completely different things when Cassel was in KC.

Cassel was a terrible QB because he was terrible. People who claim it's because he turned the ball over constantly don't remember the other shit he was notorious for doing.

If you want to point to a reason why the Chiefs were 2-14 last year, field position wasn't it.

MagicHef 10-22-2013 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10113654)
Cassel was a terrible QB because he was terrible. People who claim it's because he turned the ball over constantly don't remember the other shit he was notorious for doing.

If you want to point to a reason why the Chiefs were 2-14 last year, field position wasn't it.

The offense going 3 and out as an excuse for the defense performing poorly has been used around here for more than one year.

Mother****erJones 10-22-2013 10:52 AM

Cassel and coaching was why we were 2-14

RealSNR 10-22-2013 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10113667)
The offense going 3 and out as an excuse for the defense performing poorly has been used around here for more than one year.

In 2012, maybe. It was hard for me to admit as well that all this talent we had on defense was turning them into a piss poor unit, but it really was scheme and coaching that got us in the end.

People don't remember the missed tackles, bad angles, broken coverages, dumb penalties, lack of blitzes, lack of turnovers, and poorly trained and prepared players from poor coaches.

Our defense sucked in 2012 for THOSE reasons.

BigMeatballDave 10-22-2013 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 10113496)
Uh-Oh...Time to update the OP :)

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/powerrankings

Bump

Yes, a mod better fix this shit.

MagicHef 10-22-2013 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10113689)
In 2012, maybe. It was hard for me to admit as well that all this talent we had on defense was turning them into a piss poor unit, but it really was scheme and coaching that got us in the end.

People don't remember the missed tackles, bad angles, broken coverages, dumb penalties, lack of blitzes, lack of turnovers, and poorly trained and prepared players from poor coaches.

Our defense sucked in 2012 for THOSE reasons.

2011 as well. I remember looking up who had more 3 and outs, the Tebow led Broncos or the Cassel led Chiefs, in the middle of a comparison of defenses.

Anyway, you made me do it. Here comes the stats-troll:

Who gave up more 10+ yard plays on Sunday, Chiefs or Broncos? Chiefs.

Who held their opponent to more negative yardage plays? Broncos.

Who allowed more yards per play? Chiefs.

Who forced more punts? Broncos.

KC Dan 10-22-2013 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10113712)
2011 as well. I remember looking up who had more 3 and outs, the Tebow led Broncos or the Cassel led Chiefs, in the middle of a comparison of defenses.

Anyway, you made me do it. Here comes the stats-troll:

Who gave up more 10+ yard plays on Sunday, Chiefs or Broncos? Chiefs.

Who held their opponent to more negative yardage plays? Broncos.

Who allowed more yards per play? Chiefs.

Who forced more punts? Broncos.

Who gave up only 16 pts? Who won? Case closed

BigMeatballDave 10-22-2013 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10113689)
In 2012, maybe. It was hard for me to admit as well that all this talent we had on defense was turning them into a piss poor unit, but it really was scheme and coaching that got us in the end.

People don't remember the missed tackles, bad angles, broken coverages, dumb penalties, lack of blitzes, lack of turnovers, and poorly trained and prepared players from poor coaches.

Our defense sucked in 2012 for THOSE reasons.

And being on a short field because the offense kept giving the ball away.

MagicHef 10-22-2013 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10113716)
And being on a short field because the offense kept giving the ball away.

LMAO

BigMeatballDave 10-22-2013 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10113712)
2011 as well. I remember looking up who had more 3 and outs, the Tebow led Broncos or the Cassel led Chiefs, in the middle of a comparison of defenses.

Anyway, you made me do it. Here comes the stats-troll:

Who gave up more 10+ yard plays on Sunday, Chiefs or Broncos? Chiefs.

Who held their opponent to more negative yardage plays? Broncos.

Who allowed more yards per play? Chiefs.

Who forced more punts? Broncos.

Who allowed less points?

Who has the most sacks?

None of the garbage you are spouting matters.

BigMeatballDave 10-22-2013 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10113721)
LMAO

Why is that funny?

Why are you a ****ing moron?

Pasta Little Brioni 10-22-2013 11:21 AM

39 pts. allowed...16 Holy balls this is getting dumb ROFL

MagicHef 10-22-2013 11:27 AM

Oh, SNR...

Britton also had a terrible game, so much so that Dustin is in the lead for the first time this season. Congrats.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-22-2013 11:28 AM

From PFT....ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL

So when does Von Miller’s suspension end?

BigMeatballDave 10-22-2013 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 10113772)
From PFT....ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL

So when does Von Miller’s suspension end?

LMAO

RealSNR 10-22-2013 12:52 PM

The Terrance Copper Institute is excited

Hammock Parties 10-22-2013 03:52 PM

http://cdn0.sbnation.com/assets/3432891/peyton.jpg

Ceej 10-22-2013 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 10113772)
From PFT....ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL

So when does Von Miller’s suspension end?

ROFL ROFL

CaliforniaChief 10-22-2013 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 10113772)
From PFT....ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL

So when does Von Miller’s suspension end?

OMG LMAO

FlaChief58 10-22-2013 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10114491)

I'd hope that was the hit that starts the down spiral for the donkeys

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-22-2013 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 10113427)
While we're tearing the Broncos a new asshole, how much of a pussy is Eric Decker? He LITERALLY looked for a flag on every ****ing pass he didn't catch on Sunday night. There was even one time he was throwing his hands up to draw a flag while the ball landed 5 feet from him. Had he attempted to make the catch instead of being a little crybaby bitch, that would have had a real chance of being a completion.

I ****ing hate that guy.

Dicky-Boy Dickernut is my new McCaffrey, with 20% extra douche for added value. I want to see that gay cop mustache literally knocked right the **** off of his face.

Quesadilla Joe 10-22-2013 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Dan (Post 10113714)
Who gave up only 16 pts? Who won? Case closed

Who played against Andrew Luck?

Which team only plays against 3rd string QB's?

Mother****erJones 10-22-2013 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Von Dumbass (Post 10114679)
Who played against Andrew Luck?

Which team only plays against 3rd string QB's?

Tony romo is 3rd string? Mike Vick is too?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.