ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Your Top 5 picks for the #3 overall. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=205528)

htismaqe 04-09-2009 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by H5N1 (Post 5655623)
not sure where you're going with this one, dude. kyle turley was the seventh overall pick in the first round in 1998. so, technically, they had two tackles who were first round (and even top ten) picks. sure got them a long way, didn't it?

I misread the original post. You'll notice I addressed it in the post right before yours.

They took Chris Naole at #10 overall the year after Turley as a guard.

And they won nothing.

DaneMcCloud 04-09-2009 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5650192)
I guess I'm a ****ing reerun in this little opposite world you got going here.

I couldn't have said it better myself.

Though I probably would have added the word "verbose".

Seriously, I don't think there's been anyone in the history of Chiefsplanet that is as verbose as you, yet you rarely say anything of value.

Freakin' weird.

Ebolapox 04-09-2009 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5655644)
I misread the original post. You'll notice I addressed it in the post right before yours.

They took Chris Naole at #10 overall the year after Turley as a guard.

And they won nothing.

yeah, I was a bit too slow on the typing front.

kinda sad, though, that some will never learn--you don't HAVE to have a premium offensive line to win in the nfl. we have, what, HOW many playoff wins with several stretches where our offensive line was all-world?

ChiefsCountry 04-09-2009 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5655644)
I misread the original post. You'll notice I addressed it in the post right before yours.

They took Chris Naole at #10 overall the year after Turley as a guard.

And they won nothing.

The days of Danny Wuerfeul and Aaron Brooks at QB.

Saccopoo 04-09-2009 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23 (Post 5655636)
And how many championships have those teams won?

That wasn't the question asked by Mecca. He just wanted to know how many teams had multiple first round picks on their offensive line.

But since you asked:

Jets: One (1969)
Dolphins: Two (1973, 1974)
Raiders: Three (1977, 1981, 1984)
Panthers: None (lost the Super Bowl in 2004)
Lions: Four (1935, 1952, 1953, 1957)
Vikings: One (1969)
Rams: Three (1945, 1951, 2000)
Redskins: Five (1937, 1942, 1983, 1988, 1992)

The Franchise 04-09-2009 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5655682)
That wasn't the question asked by Mecca. He just wanted to know how many teams had multiple first round picks on their offensive line.

But since you asked:

Jets: One (1969)
Dolphins: Two (1973, 1974)
Raiders: Three (1977, 1981, 1984)
Panthers: None (lost the Super Bowl in 2004)
Lions: Four (1935, 1952, 1953, 1957)
Vikings: One (1969)
Rams: Three (1945, 1951, 2000)
Redskins: Five (1937, 1942, 1983, 1988, 1992)

How many of those were won with multiple 1st round picks on the offensive line?

Saccopoo 04-09-2009 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5655637)
Combined Playoff Wins for said teams in 2008: 0.

56-72 Aggregate record in '08.

So, if you want to have a 7-9 team, the lesson is to spend a number of high picks on the o-line and completely ignore the quarterback position.

Funny...I seem to remember the Chefs recently acquiring a quarterback. Some dude that went 11-5 last year that is young, with a nice arm, athletic, prototype size, throws a spiral...what was his name...hmmm.

Saccopoo 04-09-2009 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23 (Post 5655684)
How many of those were won with multiple 1st round picks on the offensive line?

Beats me. That's getting a little more involved than I really wanted to be.

Saccopoo 04-09-2009 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5655652)
I couldn't have said it better myself.

Though I probably would have added the word "verbose".

Seriously, I don't think there's been anyone in the history of Chiefsplanet that is as verbose as you, yet you rarely say anything of value.

Freakin' weird.

WUT>?! LAWLS!!1!

The Franchise 04-09-2009 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5655691)
Beats me. That's getting a little more involved than I really wanted to be.

The question that I keep asking myself is.....

Are you really this ****ing stupid? Or are you just playing dumb because it amuses you?

DaneMcCloud 04-09-2009 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 5654871)
I dont like Texas players. They have a long history of being soft. (Priest Holmes was the exception of course)

LMAO

Exception? You mean the guy with two torn ACL's, the hip injury, etc.?

Yeah, he was hard as nails.

LMAO

SBK 04-09-2009 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5655688)
Funny...I seem to remember the Chefs recently acquiring a quarterback. Some dude that went 11-5 last year that is young, with a nice arm, athletic, prototype size, throws a spiral...what was his name...hmmm.

Bronco Fan. Should have seen it a long time ago.

Saccopoo 04-09-2009 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23 (Post 5655695)
The question that I keep asking myself is.....

Are you really this ****ing stupid? Or are you just playing dumb because it amuses you?

Dude, I'm not going back to the 1935 draft to see if the Lions had two first round offensive lineman on their team. I don't see how that makes me either legitimately stupid, or faking reerunation.

htismaqe 04-09-2009 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5655682)
That wasn't the question asked by Mecca. He just wanted to know how many teams had multiple first round picks on their offensive line.

But since you asked:

Jets: One (1969)
Dolphins: Two (1973, 1974)
Raiders: Three (1977, 1981, 1984)
Panthers: None (lost the Super Bowl in 2004)
Lions: Four (1935, 1952, 1953, 1957)
Vikings: One (1969)
Rams: Three (1945, 1951, 2000)
Redskins: Five (1937, 1942, 1983, 1988, 1992)

You forgot the Saints, who were mentioned in the 2 or 3 posts directly preceeding this one.

They had 3 TOP TEN picks on their offensive line in 1999 and won a whopping 3 games, finishing 29th in total offense.

SBK 04-09-2009 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5656022)
You forgot the Saints, who were mentioned in the 2 or 3 posts directly preceeding this one.

They had 3 TOP TEN picks on their offensive line in 1999 and won a whopping 3 games, finishing 29th in total offense.

Bull. Everyone knows Super Bowls are won by the offensive line.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.