ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Top 10: Regrettable NFL Offseason Decisions (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=212610)

Hammock Parties 08-28-2009 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6010260)
i dont think you actually compensate for angle

Sure you do. A football field is 53 1/3 yards wide.

A 10-yard completion to the middle of the field is a much easier throw than a 10-yard out to the sideline. The sideline throw travels a much greater distance...

Bwana 08-28-2009 02:50 PM

[quote=TFG;6009991]
Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6009979)


I would not describe that as a "zipped" ball. It is arced. The initial angle of ascent is about 30 degrees. Cutler, Elway, JaMarcus, they can throw those FLAT.

JaMarcus ROFL Yeah, perhaps we should have traded for that dude, because he can "throw a flat ball." :spock:

TFG 08-28-2009 03:08 PM

[QUOTE=Bwana;6010282]
Quote:

Originally Posted by TFG (Post 6009991)

JaMarcus ROFL Yeah, perhaps we should have traded for that dude, because he can "throw a flat ball." :spock:



Not much matters if the big uglies on the other team's defense blow right by the offensive line...

It matters more, too, when its a rookie or young kid QB. If you look at who had success and who didn't, the OL plays a big variable. Big Ben started his rookie year with 3 OL Pro Bowlers in Marvel Smith, Faneca, and Hartings. Culpepper had 4 OL Pro Bowlers, Moss and Carter, and Robert Smith when he started. Dave Carr had no protection, as a good example of the reverse.

Fix the OL first. THEN get the rookie QB. The Colts learned from Jeff George, who had no protection at all. When Peyton was picked, Tarik Glenn and the other OT - Meadows - were already there. Ryan Leaf did not enjoy such protection, but had other problems too...

OnTheWarpath15 08-28-2009 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6010275)
Sure you do. A football field is 53 1/3 yards wide.

A 10-yard completion to the middle of the field is a much easier throw than a 10-yard out to the sideline. The sideline throw travels a much greater distance...

I can't believe that was questioned.

TFG 08-28-2009 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6010275)
Sure you do. A football field is 53 1/3 yards wide.

A 10-yard completion to the middle of the field is a much easier throw than a 10-yard out to the sideline. The sideline throw travels a much greater distance...


Yes, indeed, we can agree about that. Anyone want a lesson on "hypotenuse" measure??

Hammock Parties 08-28-2009 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TFG (Post 6010336)
Yes, indeed, we can agree about that. Anyone want a lesson on "hypotenuse" measure??

Well let's see....47 yards on one side, 27 yards on the other (Cassel is in the middle of the field), what's the other side come out to?

Once we know that we can determine the velocity of the throw and convert to mph and compare to MLB...

:rockon:

SAUTO 08-28-2009 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6010335)
I can't believe that was questioned.

so you would say that ball was a 50 yard throw?

SAUTO 08-28-2009 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6010275)
Sure you do. A football field is 53 1/3 yards wide.

A 10-yard completion to the middle of the field is a much easier throw than a 10-yard out to the sideline. The sideline throw travels a much greater distance...

i get that. but is that how the nfl or anyone else measures the throw?

OnTheWarpath15 08-28-2009 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6010352)
so you would say that ball was a 50 yard throw?

I haven't followed the thread.

I just noticed that you don't understand basic math.

L.A. Chieffan 08-28-2009 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6010357)
i get that. but is that how the nfl or anyone else measures the throw?

no

Hammock Parties 08-28-2009 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6010357)
i get that. but is that how the nfl or anyone else measures the throw?

Not for statistical purposes.

But for real-world purposes, sure.

SAUTO 08-28-2009 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6010362)
I haven't followed the thread.

I just noticed that you don't understand basic math.

you ****ing idiot i understand math. next time you should follow the thread before saying stupid shit

SAUTO 08-28-2009 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6010377)
Not for statistical purposes.

thank you. now that was a 40 yard throw in the air. from the 47 to the 7

Hammock Parties 08-28-2009 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6010385)
thank you. now that was a 40 yard throw in the air. from the 47 to the 7

Only for statistical purposes.

The actual length of the throw was closer to 50 yards.

http://www.csgnetwork.com/mthrighttri.html

48.2 if we assume Cassel is standing 27 yards from the sideline and the ball travels from the 47 to the 7.

SAUTO 08-28-2009 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6010388)
Only for statistical purposes.

The actual length of the throw was closer to 50 yards.

http://www.csgnetwork.com/mthrighttri.html

48.2 if we assume Cassel is standing 27 yards from the sideline.

claythan no one calls it that way NO ONE


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.