ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Life Government will require all Americans by 2014 to have a Obesity Rating (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=230762)

MadMax 07-16-2010 07:40 PM

People who eat food are gonna need a bailout!

luv 07-16-2010 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MadMax (Post 6884497)
People who eat food are gonna need a bailout!

Losing weight is so much easier when being able to buy food is not an option.

RJ 07-16-2010 07:41 PM

[QUOTE=Just Passin' By;6884470]Yes, all the "specialty" stores gouge you on price. Whole Foods, etc... have a great racket going, and the so-called organics are ridiculous. Even the chain supermarkets are charging you $5 bucks for a pound of salad.

$5 bucks for a pound of salad, or less than $5 for a couple of dollar menu items, some fries and a Coke.....

Even something as basic as a cucumber has become relatively expensive.[/QUOTE



Still though, most fresh produce is pretty cheap and goes a long way. Especially this time of year. When it's the best it's also the cheapest.

But for someone on a tight budget macaroni & cheese, hamburger helper and ramen noodles really help stretch the dollar and leave the bellies full. It's not coincidence that poor people are so often overweight. Low income Hispanic and NA folks down here eat a lot of rice, beans and tortillas - no wonder the high incidence of diabetes.

Silock 07-16-2010 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 6884074)
You don't have to be a professional athlete to have those body types. I was just using the Pros to point out that even those who are quite fit can fall under the "obese" category when BMI is being used.

It's a very poor method of analysis.

Those people are few and far between. Again, I'm not arguing that it's perfect. I'm simply saying it's not nearly as wildly off as most people believe.

Silock 07-16-2010 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6884286)
If you have access to alternative shopping options like Farmer's Markets, etc - then I would tend to agree.

If a supermarket is your only realistic option - then I completely disagree.

I read a study once for a sociology class where foods that are considered healthy averaged over $18 per 1000 calories, while foods that are considered unhealthy such as cookies, chips, etc cost just under $1.50 per 1000 calories.

I'm in the same position as Guru. My wife and I have started eating healthier and cutting out chips, soda, cookies, etc. Our grocery bill has gone up over 70%.

That's crazy. Perhaps there are some other ways you can save money. Buy cheaper cuts of meat. I went from buying $8 "tastier" cuts of sirloin to leaner cuts of top sirloin that only cost $6 for 16 oz. of steak. That's a lot of meat. You can get lean cuts of pork loin 16 oz. for $4. That's a lot of meat, again. For fruits and veggies, frozen is just as good as fresh, and cheaper.

Just Passin' By 07-16-2010 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silock (Post 6884778)
Those people are few and far between. Again, I'm not arguing that it's perfect. I'm simply saying it's not nearly as wildly off as most people believe.

5'9" 205lbs makes one obese, per BMI, as does 6'0" 222 lbs and 6'3" 241 lbs.


It's wildly off for a whole lot of people. It really only has value for people of "average" build.

Bugeater 07-16-2010 11:58 PM

Frozen vegetables are NOT just as good as fresh. Not even close.

007 07-17-2010 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 6884805)
5'9" 205lbs makes one obese, per BMI, as does 6'0" 222 lbs and 6'3" 241 lbs.


It's wildly off for a whole lot of people. It really only has value for people of "average" build.

Hell IIRC Micheal Jordan on the 90's was technically obese according to that archaic BMI system.

Silock 07-17-2010 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 6884805)
5'9" 205lbs makes one obese, per BMI, as does 6'0" 222 lbs and 6'3" 241 lbs.


It's wildly off for a whole lot of people. It really only has value for people of "average" build.

Show me someone who's naturally 5'9", 205 and doesn't have fat to lose. That person is in an EXTREME minority, as is a natural 6'3", 241 without fat to lose.

EDIT: Just looking up some NFL guys, and there's hardly anyone that even comes close to those numbers. We have Steve Smith at 5'9", 185. BMI is "overweight." However, we've already established that the BMI isn't good for professional athletes. Show me someone in the gym that's even close to as big as Steve Smith with as low a body fat percentage, and again, we're talking EXTREME minority. As for 6'3", there are plenty of guys that tall in the skill positions, and hardly any of them come in anywhere close to 241. Linemen yes, but then, many linemen ARE carrying around a significant amount of fat (which isn't to say that they aren't in phenomenal shape, because they absolutely are). So on that end of the spectrum, too, it's an extreme minority. Like I said -- BMI is pretty inaccurate for NFL guys, but even then, most of them only come in in the "overweight" category, and not the "obese" category. They are super rare physical specimens that may or may not have obtained their size naturally. Super-rare, not a good fit for BMI. But most people aren't super-rare, as much as they like to think they are. Therefore, the BMI is generally a good INDICATOR, although it is hardly definitive of anything.

Average build is average for a reason. It fits the vast majority of people. Again, BMI isn't perfect and I'm not claiming it is.

Silock 07-17-2010 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 6884807)
Frozen vegetables are NOT just as good as fresh. Not even close.

Nutritionally, they're exactly the same. Taste, well, that's different. Some of that depends on how you thaw it, but you can make most anything from frozen vegetables.

But if you're trying to eat well on a budget, there's no reason NOT to buy frozen vegetables.

Silock 07-17-2010 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 6884813)
Hell IIRC Micheal Jordan on the 90's was technically obese according to that archaic BMI system.

Huh? No, he was on the high end of normal.

007 07-17-2010 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silock (Post 6884830)
Huh? No, he was on the high end of normal.

That isn't what was reported back when I used to read up on it. He was always one of the examples on how BMI is very inaccurate. I probably misstated him being obese. Probable fell in the overweight category now that I think about it.

The BMI calculations need adjustments though.

EDIT

This isn't the same sources I read it from but it is an example of the stuff I did read.

http://www.medicinenet.com/script/ma...ticlekey=79655

"Take for example, basketball player Michael Jordan: ''When he was in his prime, his BMI was 27-29, classifying him as overweight, yet his waist size was less than 30,'' says Michael Roizen, MD. "

Hammock Parties 07-17-2010 12:38 AM

5-9 205 is definitely overweight.

I was 5-11 205 with plenty of muscle and I wanted to lose weight...so I did....

Silock 07-17-2010 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 6884837)
That isn't what was reported back when I used to read up on it. He was always one of the examples on how BMI is very inaccurate. I probably misstated him being obese. Probable fell in the overweight category now that I think about it.

The BMI calculations need adjustments though.

EDIT

This isn't the same sources I read it from but it is an example of the stuff I did read.

http://www.medicinenet.com/script/ma...ticlekey=79655

"Take for example, basketball player Michael Jordan: ''When he was in his prime, his BMI was 27-29, classifying him as overweight, yet his waist size was less than 30,'' says Michael Roizen, MD. "

Except, when you plug in his stats, 6'6", 215 lbs, you get 24.84, which is on the extremely high end of normal. BTW, his college weight was 195, which is DEFINITELY in the normal range.

007 07-17-2010 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silock (Post 6884843)
Except, when you plug in his stats, 6'6", 215 lbs, you get 24.84, which is on the extremely high end of normal. BTW, his college weight was 195, which is DEFINITELY in the normal range.

Not trying to argue with you on it. Just stating what was reported at the time.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.