Wrong.

I have literally NEVER called for anyone to be fired until this year.

Our front line talent isn't all that bad. Sure, there's room for improvement but we have some playmakers.

Our problem is depth. We are really, really thin almost everywhere. And, of course, this year we lost three of our best players to kick things off.

Pioli needs to get some quality depth in here, a quarterback with both ability and promise, and fix a couple of glaring problems in the starting lineup (see right offensive tackle).

We're not that far away, really. I have my doubts, though, as to whether or not Pioli can or will do that stuff.

FAX

It really is that simple.

At this point there is so much more bad than good there's no point in trying to point out the positives.

Good coaches in this league don't really have to be defended after three years on the job. Their work speaks for itself.

When healthy, we have a top notch running game and excellent receivers. The oline is better than Indy and new England. They aren't exceptional but are terrific run blockers and good enough in pass protection. Our offense has potential to be explosive around the right qb.

Our defense is solid but unspectacular. But good enough to keep us in games even thoguh we ask too much of them. Behind a top 10 offense, this defense is more than good enough.

You're a total reactionary. Own it man. It makes you who you are, it's why eveyone loves you.

http://i42.tinypic.com/24pc3lg.jpg

Our oline is needs an upgrade - Hudson needs to play and we need to draft a LG.

Definitely. But they are more than adequate for a qb who actually recognizes how to adjust for the blitz. Tyler palko showed that on Monday.

http://static5.businessinsider.com/~...X=400&maxY=300

I can't argue with that. We do need to get some young guys in there that can build a solid nucleus that can stay together for a while. Casey has a year or two left, and his performance is going to totally hit the shitter at some point.

I'll own up to the fact that I can get high after wins and low after losses.

But never in a million years would I call for a HC or GM to be fired after two seasons.

Didn't even do that with Herm.

ROFL.

I love how you incorporate the word "can" in there.

As if you had a choice, or took a moment to think about things.

You never have to actually post that you wanted someone fired to make my point valid.

It's the fact that you're all giffing them up one week, and then damning them to the fires of hell the next.

You know it's true, so why keep up this argument?

Me, I'm just bored at work and don't take this shit personally becasue we're on the internet.

You're ruled by your emotions, and that's cool man. It reminds me of my nieces and nephews.

This. If we had an NT that ate up doubleteams Dorsey and TJax would start getting penetration and disrupting more plays. They already hold their own pretty well vs. the run.

I'm convinced there's some law of nature against the Chiefs having a tough DL. Phillips and Salameua was the last time we had an interior line that intimidated anyone. Well except for like a half dozen games where someone pissed in McGlockton's cheerios and he decided to actually try.

Two questions.
Can Aaron Rodgers, drew brees, hell even Matt Ryan alone turn this team into a super bowl contender.

On the flip side, would Mary cassel make the saints, packers, or falcons a serious contender.

I was pushing for Cody in the draft inspite of his flabby tittays. We need a mauler in the middle. It might actually make LoserSU twins pretty serviceable.

If everyone was healthy?

1. Yes
2. **** no