ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs John Dorsey (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268434)

keg in kc 01-08-2013 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9297257)
That wasn't the point.

It should be. Nothing else matters until you take care of the QB.

HolyHat 01-08-2013 05:04 PM

We dont get the luxury of taking the BPA, Peehole ruined our QB shituation. No other position matters to me in this draft. Take a QB in all rounds if need be. This is a QB league and right now we are getting donkey fuked at that position. After we have a QB, than we can start taking BPA each year.

Dorsey of all people knows the importance of having a playmaking QB. So yes RUNKC, I'll be pissed if we take ANY other position other than QB #1

Dante84 01-08-2013 05:08 PM

"Best Player Available" and Positional Value do not have to be mutually exclusive. So many fail to understand this. Think outside the box.

You can develop a scoring system that takes into account:
- Roster Need (Go 80 deep by position and depth)
- Positional value (ranking against others of the same position and type)
- Measurables (combine stats, height/weight, hand size)
- Talent (body of work, performance, stats, accomplishments)
- Risk (injury, off the field)
- Intelligence (football IQ, general IQ)
- Intangibles (leadership, personality, work ethic)

Grade each prospect. Grade each FA. Update your grades regularly. Compare with those you trust. Combine grades......

AND BOOM.

You have a formula to determine the "Best Player Available."

okcchief 01-08-2013 05:13 PM

If a QB close to overall best on the board they will take one. It's the biggest position of need. Unless they pick up one through free agency or the a trade. I hope they pick Geno because I will have to stay away from the board if not. The meltdowns will be ridiculous. I'm trusting the regime for a couple of years and see how it goes. I know the old one would **** it up, but if you are happy about the hires you have to ride it until they are proven wrong IMO.

NJChiefsFan 01-08-2013 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9297178)
This is why the New York Giants are good every year.

A few years ago people were a little confused with their pick of JPP because they already had Osi, Tuck and Kiwanuka.

That sure turned out for the best.

How does it turn out of they have an average QB on their team instead of Eli Manning?

htismaqe 01-08-2013 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9297266)
It should be. Nothing else matters until you take care of the QB.

Exactly.

RunKC 01-08-2013 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9297266)
It should be. Nothing else matters until you take care of the QB.

I agree.

I'm just tired of taking reaches like Javier Arenas, Dexter McCluster and Tyson Jackson when there are better players on the board.

Mother****erJones 01-08-2013 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9297392)
I agree.

I'm just tired of taking reaches like Javier Arenas, Dexter McCluster and Tyson Jackson when there are better players on the board.

Buddy you dont have that to worry about anymore!

Nightfyre 01-08-2013 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante84 (Post 9297290)
"Best Player Available" and Positional Value do not have to be mutually exclusive. So many fail to understand this. Think outside the box.

You can develop a scoring system that takes into account:
- Roster Need (Go 80 deep by position and depth)
- Positional value (ranking against others of the same position and type)
- Measurables (combine stats, height/weight, hand size)
- Talent (body of work, performance, stats, accomplishments)
- Risk (injury, off the field)
- Intelligence (football IQ, general IQ)
- Intangibles (leadership, personality, work ethic)

Grade each prospect. Grade each FA. Update your grades regularly. Compare with those you trust. Combine grades......

AND BOOM.

You have a formula to determine the "Best Player Available."

Better yet, you can weight each of those categories as necessary for each position, etc. to further refine the model. For example, you may not care about a CB or RB's football IQ. Because clearly it doesn't matter.

HolyHat 01-08-2013 05:45 PM

BPA = Biggest Penis Available = Geno Smith

Chiefs Pantalones 01-08-2013 05:51 PM

I just don't see any reason not to take a QB with the first pick. Who else is there that just says, "This guy would benefit our team more than insert whichever QB the team thinks is best in the draft."

Who we gonna pick up in FA? Vick=sucks. Alex Smith=sucks. Matt Flynn=get out of here.

I think we should do what the Skins did. Draft a QB with our first pick, then pick another one in the mid rounds. JMO.

Mi_chief_fan 01-08-2013 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by @KCsporting (Post 9297410)
BPA = Biggest Penis Available = Geno Smith

Wow.

FAX 01-08-2013 05:56 PM

Mayhaps many of us are suffering from lingering Dr. Evilism. If Herm can draft, so can Wally.

Besides, every team hits a few and misses some. It just goes with the territory. But, so far as quarterback is concerned, who in their right mind believes that Wally can or be willing to coach a team that has no quarterback? Only guys like Herm and Haley and Roleo can do something like that.

I say we allow the ladies to do the fretting and gnashing of teeth whilst we focus on giving Wally more than two days to organize and prioritize the team needs ... oh, and trapping gophers. Focus on giving Wally more than two days and trapping gophers. But that's it.

FAX

htismaqe 01-08-2013 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9297392)
I agree.

I'm just tired of taking reaches like Javier Arenas, Dexter McCluster and Tyson Jackson when there are better players on the board.

So are we. All the more reason to take a QB.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-08-2013 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mi_chief_fan (Post 9297442)
Wow.

ROFL


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.