jettio |
05-19-2004 12:24 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY
Dude, if there has been anyone avoiding the facts it's you. Kobe's shot was a hard foul. AP struck KG and dropped him the first shot which had nothing to do with basketball. When KG retaliated with a little elbow to the chest which was not nearly as fierce as the initial strike by AP he tries to take his head off with an elbow that once again could never be confused with a basketball play. The only reason KG wasn't dropped is because AP is a weak ass. I don't know why I even bother debating with you, your nothing like your brother when it comes to common sence. Even AP didn't have an issue with the suspension he said it was just playoff basketball. To date your the only person I have talked to out of all the Kings fans down here that thinks this was unjust. I guess your used to making excuses being a Kings fan but your viewpoint on this is ludicrous. Don't you also find it strange that you are on a BB full of Laker haters you have yet to get one person to agree with you? MOF the Laker haters are calling you a fool. I hope you guys do make it to the next round so LA can clean your clock once again.
|
No problem. I probably did go overboard in this discussion, but no sense in apologizing in a Laker thread. :thumb:
No hard feelings, and I might once again have to rebuild my reputation, but I do have to screw up once in a while so that keep fan club membership exclusive.
But I will say:
The first shot on Garnett was something that happens all the time in basketball, it just happened to catch KG in the solar plexus and he went down. If that been called as a foul, which it was not. It would not have even been a flagrant foul.
I bet that in the history of NBA Basketball that is the first time that an offensive player has been called for a flagrant foul for initiating a fight and the player on which the flagrant foul was committed got the more severe punishment.
I don't know you are making a big deal about whether or not the shot delivered by AP had any force behind it, but the fact that you keep saying that it didn't, reveals that you do not know what you are talking about.
No since going round and round on this. KG was as much in the wrong, and the league should not have suspended either one.
Rod Thorn was fair when he had that job and the Nets have become a good team since he started working there.
Stu Jackson suspended Ron Artest earlier in the playoffs for barely stepping on the floor during an altercation. Expect more bad decisions from Jackson, he is just that kind of guy.
Anyway.
Enough said about this.
|