shaneo69 |
03-08-2006 11:54 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspchief
Look at the title of the article. It's an article about why the Chiefs don't need Ty Law. Dawes is a PR vehicle for the Chiefs. You'll never convince me otherwise. Where else is he published besides kcchiefs.com?
I'm not commenting on what the team should or should not do in regards to FA.
But if the organization wants to keep telling fans that we don't need FA player X, because good teams build through the draft, then the organization is going to have to actually build through the draft. They are trying to tell Joe Chiefs fan that we don't need Law because NE and PIT built championship teams with good drafting. But Joe Chiefs fan looks at our drafts, and questions whether the Chiefs can succeed on the same path as NE or PIT.
I don't give a shit about Law. I can give 100 reasons why I don't want him and the team shouldn't draft him. But I'm tired of the KC mouthpiece telling me that a team should succeed using a particular model, when they are clearly incapable of replicating that model.
|
Alfonzo Hodge is a perfect example of this. As weak as our CB's were last year, Hodge should've played a lot of downs in our nickel packages (and if we did a good job of drafting, he would've played well). Then when Warfield was cut, instead of clamoring for Ty Law, the fans would see the natural progression of Hodge moving into the starting position.
Same with Siavii at DT. Our DT's were horrible. Sims was hurt most of the year. Siavii should've played a lot in his 2nd year (and if we did a good job of drafting, he would've played well). He should've been pushing Dalton to the point where it's an easy decision to let Dalton walk because Siavii is ready to step in.
But no Chief fan in their right mind will say that Hodge and Siavii should be penciled in as starters next season. How can Rufus blame the fans and media for wanting FA's to come in and start at those positions? And should we really expect rookies from this year's draft to come in and start at those positions?
Sure, Rufus will blame media/fans for not being patient enough to let players like Siavii and Hodge develop, but he doesn't say a word about the coaches who didn't give them any playing time for experience and to see if they are worthy of future starting positions. Instead, we just get the B.S. from Rand about how the Chiefs were patient with Warfield and gave him enough time (8 years) to fulfill his Pro Bowl (7th round) skills. Sorry, for most teams, NFL means Not For Long if you don't show anything in the first season or two.
|