![]() |
Quote:
And I was purely talking plane vs plane. Nothing more. Imagine equally skilled pilots, ideal weather conditions, etc. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But, considering that the F-15Cs that got their asses handed to them recently didn't even detect the Raptors, and the C has one of the best radar systems in the world, forgive me for if I don't believe that the Russians would do any better (or even come close). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I was watching a discovery channel special on these planes a little while ago. They said that the radar on the planes is so advance that they can pick up enemy aircraft, launch their missles and bug out of the area before the enemy ever realizes there might be someone there.
|
Quote:
The days of the close-in dogfight are over. A2A combat isn't a fair fight - it's standoff weaponry nailing targets 25-150miles down range. The SU-35 has superior thrust-vectoring; the rooskies excel in that technology. Problem is with their radar and guidance systems. They are way behind in that regard. Due to that fact, they'd be splashed w/o even knowing where the shots came from. Hell, that holds true for facing Tomcats & the Phoenix AAM... Phoenix is the size of a Volkswagon van; launches at targets at 100+ miles. |
Quote:
Unless the Broncos were involved. |
Quote:
The Raptor has a good, ole Vulcan cannon, just in case. |
Quote:
ALWAYS better to be safe than sorry. If all things were equal, without radar and missiles, just straight-up gunning by line of sight, the SU-35 would be one tough bird to take down. The Russian thrust-vectoring is superior in every way. Their vectoring is a full 360degree vector, whereas the F22 vectors on the Y axis only; and to a lesser angle. |
Only $125 million??????
Gimme two of 'em!!!!!!! Dinny |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.