Just how much our offensive productivity will go down (I expect a huge dropoff) with a big TOP increase.

Who will play CB opposite of Surtain.

You're stupid.

Don't you mean stoopid?

My second pick was Hali vs. Hicks, fwiw. That one will be interesting as well.

Don't care about the backup QB's, because nomatter who it is, if he has to play for any extended period of time...we're fucked.

Where's Reid vs. Boomer?

back up qb, definantly. what i saw at mini camp huard was huar-able. i think that the competition between croyle and printers could push them both passed the never was.

pollard looks to make an impact somewhere, i think he'll make a run at the free safety spot, he's more athletic than wesly and probably better in coverage.

hali will push hicks from the starting spot by week five or six, if not before. hix has become complacent in his starting job, happy with being an average at best de. hali seems to have an attitude like LJ, exactly what the defense needs.

I bet Patriots fans were saying that in 2001.

I doubt that, with Bledsoe.

Either way, while you have your Tom Brady or Kurt Warner once in a blue moon, most of the time losing your starting QB means golf in January, rather than football.

What Croyle and/or Printers will be 2 or 3 years from now interests me. Not so much what they'll be in September. I hope we don't see either one of them in 2006. Or Huard.