I agree you can't just have these dogs running around livestock, they are animal aggressive. They however are not human aggressive by nature. Kansas and Missouri now lead the nation in BSL, that's not a good thing. Remember in areas where they get it through the next goal is to add additional breeds.

They can have my dog when they pry it from my peanut butter encrusted....

Oh, wait a minute.

humaniacs saveing us from us.

animalrights really means less rights for you.

And how many of those resulted in maiming or death? I don't agree with banning, but let's acknowledge that certqain breeds are more capable of inflicting serious injury than others.

The debate will rage forever with the gangbangers and whomever who has the pittbulls all going nutso over bans while the media makes sure we get prime time coverage of pitbull attacks on kids, old ladys, and whoever.

That pitbull that killed a lady in KC about a month after another pitbull put a guy in the hospital for about 3 weeks pretty well tipped it over in KC area.

Not many lab killings or scotch terrier maulings being reported.

Indeed.

No question. There are many breeds capable of quite extensive damage.

If all Pit Bull breeders were reputable and only sold to reputable persons this wouldn't be a big issue.

Texas state law prohibits Breed Specific Legislation (BSL), but we expect
numerous bills to be filed regarding dangerous dogs when the legislature
convenes in January, including another attempt to repeal the existing law.
RPOA defeated such an attempt last legislative session with the help of many
breed clubs. The woman recently in the news who received the face
transplant was attacked by a Labrador Retriever. No breed of dog is
inherently vicious.

You have lost your burst. It has been ages since one of your little posts has been the least bit entertaining let alone funny. You need to go back to when you would pop in rare occasions.

In Kc we have not heard anyone ever mention banning other breeds. Thats why states should allow single breed banning so you dont force stupid crap like banning dogs of a certain size. If they had not passed that boneheaded breed specific deal they could ban pitbulls and move on.

Yes it would be because the people who are promoting this legislation are against the domestic ownership of all animals. The pit was just a tool used to try and get BSL pased. Now that they are beginning to lose that battle their real objective is easier to see as they go after all dogs above a certain size. They are going to try and make that size as small as possible to get as many breeds as they can.

In my experience, the Great White Pekingese is an unruly little bastard. Don't go near their water.

FAX

You haven't had a chance to see the long term effects of the legislation as it has just recently passed there. Give it some time. Denver who started all this shit has already considered making Rottweilers next. Owners need to be held accountable for the actions of their dogs period, whatever breed. Once you start down the path of that breed of dog has vicious tendencies you leave the door wide open. If you look at the history of dog legislation globally and the people promoting it they never stop with one breed or even 10. Remember the objective.