Chiefs articles on a Chiefs messageboard.
Technically your mother is hiding her head in shame at your reasoning.

I really...honestly...not trying to be obtuse...never did understand that Laz school of reasoning that WPI stuff was spam.

I Charger fan gets a warning but I get mine permanently removed? What the ****.

For months, they would try to get people to get people to come to thier message board and try out their magazine. They even went as far as giving away subscriptions to thier magazine.

Agreed. ESPN and SI are linked just as often and nobody thinks that is spam. It stands to reason that major sports sites are frequently going to be linked on a sports oriented messageboard, likewise it stands to reason that a Chiefs oriented news site will be linked on a Chiefs board.

The spam argument doesn't make any kind of sense except that it's people with a bias against WPI.

*I am not a shill. I never go to WPI

So you don't have a problem with the Chiefs articles they posted?

With the articles, no. With the way they were whoring out thier site, yes.

I was a little amazed at the number of threads on the subject of religion when I logged in this evening.

In my mind, Mr. Believer has some issues. He may be brainwashed, in fact. However, I hesitate to recommend banning. I would rather see his thread-making privileges curtailed somehow in order to derail his crusade to convert the Planet heathens.

I respect his views as well as his right to speak his mind (although I'm somewhat unconvinced of his sincerity), but I think he would find it more enjoyable posting religious subjects on a board suited to spiritual topics.

But, now that I think about it, perhaps a darn good scourging is in order. Then we can decide whether to ban him or Barabas.

FAX

I guess I see your point? But not really aside from the whoring being very very minimal esp when you talk about the creation of threads.

Besides that, established members have always had leeway to pimp their own shit in a cases where if noobs did the same thing they would be squashed fast.

I guess I am a good example...if I had pushed all the stuff I do on ZachIsHere.com or my upcoming photography store and wasn't established as a contributor here it wouldn't go over. Ali Chiefs comes to mind...there are more examples...

Seems much ado about nothing. :hmmm:

I agree with you here



as far as the topic of the thread goes...

I love Jesus.

but no one will listen to the message as long as it is be force down their throat... if people have questions about religion and feel beliver can help with that then that should probably take place in a P.M or something

His crusade is for naught.

Don't lump me in with Phil. I wasn't trying to get anyone to come over to Warpaint. And I gave away no subscriptions.

Thread posting restrictions would be better than nothing. But still, people like this don't get better; it's not like this guy is an enemy troll who'll one day get assimilated into the community. He's a crusader; he's here to crusade. That's all he'll ever do.

If I'm not mistaken, the rule is to have a simple link in your sig. Getting back to the point, what is the reasoning behind banishment? I'm not defending the guy, but it would seem that taking away his thread making capablities would cure the problem.

I know you agree he shouldn't be banned, but why do others believe he should? Anybody.


SPchief,
just trying to figure it out.