ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   I'm calling out Hootie (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=171809)

Mr. Plow 10-07-2007 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave
17 points. 7 of which was off of a turnover from your boy. The loss cannot be hung on the D. If our O cannot muster 17 points at home, they deserve to lose.

More often than not, we are not going to get 17 points.

Hootie 10-07-2007 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HonestChieffan
Sort of reinforces the "chickenshit" label.

I thought we had 10 yards rushing. Didnt Law have two solo tackles in the first half both for losses?

Didnt Huard play the entire game except the 4 plays when we scored a TD? Damn the facts, full steam ahead!!

Fueled by stupidity ignorance has no limits!

Huard didn't play bad...

Huard threw the ball downfield.

With no rushing attack against a solid defense, the play-action pass is only going to work for so long.

Law played TOTALLY awful.

Huard has an inept offensive coordinator.

AND

Are you truly going to cite that last play touchdown in your post?

Croyle was throwing the ball against four man fronts...whooopdeedoo...

He looked WAY MORE TIMID than Huard did...and he was throwing THE SAME QUICK PASSES Huard does...

When Croyle takes over the team, IF Croyle takes over the team, you're all setting yourselves up for a big disappointment.

Croyle makes his read before he even snaps the ball...you don't think defenses are going to pick up on this and 'bate' him into making the stupid pass?

seclark 10-07-2007 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
That long pass in the 4th quarter was really nothing more than the Chiefs having to take dumb risks to try and spark the offense...

that your boy couldn't have made...try pulling something else out of that cumbucket you call your asshole.
sec

DaKCMan AP 10-07-2007 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
This is on Solari, the offensive line, LJ, etc...

Basically, everyone but Huard. He played like a pro-bowler today!

:stupid:

Mr. Plow 10-07-2007 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave
Its all about the points given up. I don't give a rats ass about yards. If we had any kind of offense, we'd be 5-0.

We are giving up 17 points a game while scoring 12.

Mr. Plow 10-07-2007 06:54 PM

I'm behind you Hootie. Don't let the man get you down.

BigMeatballDave 10-07-2007 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave
Its all about the points given up. I don't give a rats ass about yards. If we had any kind of offense, we'd be 5-0.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow
We are giving up 17 points a game while scoring 12.


Hootie 10-07-2007 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave
17 points. 7 of which was off of a turnover from your boy. The loss cannot be hung on the D. If our O cannot muster 17 points at home, they deserve to lose.

'7 of which was off of a turnover from your boy'...

Yeah...

No.

He threw a pick when we were down 0-17...and the game was over.

I know everyone hates Huard on this board, but putting this loss on his shoulders is a ****ing joke. It's sickening, really...

We have a horrible playcalling coordinator, a terrible running game, a right tackle who cannot pass protect or run block, a center who gets manhandled every game, a right-guard who is in dire need of his roid supply, yet, we're going to blame the loss on Damon Huard??

You're right, because with our offense BUILT around LJ who wasn't even getting a yard per carry it's still going to be Damon Huard's fault...

At least Damon was moving the ball when they were calling passing plays...Solari was ****ing it up by even trying to run. We should've kept using the play-action until Jacksonville had an answer for it, instead Solari ****ed it up by even TRYING to run...there wasn't a single running lane created by our ridiculously awful offensive line the entire game.

LJ should just ****ing go on his inevitable rant RIGHT NOW, because I think it's due. **** Solari, **** the offensive line...I want to hear from LJ.

LOCOChief 10-07-2007 06:57 PM

Croyle gets rid of the ball 3 gazillion times faaster than Huard, and didn't freak in the pocket either. His td pass still had enough behind it even though he was hit. But I don't know how we're going to run the ball.

BigMeatballDave 10-07-2007 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
Huard didn't play bad...

Huard threw the ball downfield.

With no rushing attack against a solid defense, the play-action pass is only going to work for so long.

Law played TOTALLY awful.

Huard has an inept offensive coordinator.

AND

Are you truly going to cite that last play touchdown in your post?

Croyle was throwing the ball against four man fronts...whooopdeedoo...

He looked WAY MORE TIMID than Huard did...and he was throwing THE SAME QUICK PASSES Huard does...

When Croyle takes over the team, IF Croyle takes over the team, you're all setting yourselves up for a big disappointment.

Croyle makes his read before he even snaps the ball...you don't think defenses are going to pick up on this and 'bate' him into making the stupid pass?

The O is inefffective with Huard. Its time to try something different.

Hootie 10-07-2007 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP
Basically, everyone but Huard. He played like a pro-bowler today!

:stupid:

It wasn't on Huard or Tony Gonzalez, that's for sure. Those are the only two who showed up today...

BigMeatballDave 10-07-2007 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie
'7 of which was off of a turnover from your boy'...

Yeah...

No.

He threw a pick when we were down 0-17...and the game was over.

I know everyone hates Huard on this board, but putting this loss on his shoulders is a ****ing joke. It's sickening, really...

We have a horrible playcalling coordinator, a terrible running game, a right tackle who cannot pass protect or run block, a center who gets manhandled every game, a right-guard who is in dire need of his roid supply, yet, we're going to blame the loss on Damon Huard??

You're right, because with our offense BUILT around LJ who wasn't even getting a yard per carry it's still going to be Damon Huard's fault...

At least Damon was moving the ball when they were calling passing plays...Solari was ****ing it up by even trying to run. We should've kept using the play-action until Jacksonville had an answer for it, instead Solari ****ed it up by even TRYING to run...there wasn't a single running lane created by our ridiculously awful offensive line the entire game.

LJ should just ****ing go on his inevitable rant RIGHT NOW, because I think it's due. **** Solari, **** the offensive line...I want to hear from LJ.

Thanks for playing, "I know jack shit about football".

HonestChieffan 10-07-2007 06:58 PM

Hooties getting his supply from Travis whatshisdopedealer in Denver.

Hootie 10-07-2007 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LOCOChief
Croyle gets rid of the ball 3 gazillion times faaster than Huard, and didn't freak in the pocket either. His td pass still had enough behind it even though he was hit. But I don't know how we're going to run the ball.

Didn't freak in the pocket?! Oh man, it's amazing what people see during the game...

He makes his read before he snaps the ball...the dude was playing the SAME WAY Huard plays, except WAY less accurate...and he wasn't facing blitzing linebackers or safeties...

His TD pass was totally, 100% meaningless. The game was over. Huard is a better QB for our inept offense than Croyle...if it's going to take a game or two of Croyle to see this, so be it.

Hootie 10-07-2007 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave
The O is inefffective with Huard. Its time to try something different.

well let's see how good Brodie Croyle is with our 9 total yards of rushing!

I'm sure most QB's in the NFL would've lined up behind center for us and lead us to victory with that power rushing attack we have!

ROFL ROFL ROFL


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.