![]() |
I really don't know how much of it's LJ, but if he isn't running effectively, he is worthless, because he is a liability in the passing game.
|
Quote:
|
what ****ing holes?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
|
I think he's playing hurt. Even Herm was saying he wasn't 100% during the week and was considering not playing LJ.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I like hearing other peoples take on what they think is wrong. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Your post was relevent, but this one is too. He does look complacent, and I for one am thrilled he's been called out by ESPN. Expect better production immediately. Not the numbers we're used too, this line he's running behind put him in this funk. I have a feeling this is the week he comes out now. Thanks ESPN. |
ESPN is still lighting him up. Tom Jackson goes on to talk about unnamed players getting fat contracts and letting up, telling them to find new vocations because they're tough to watch. Boomer follows it up immediately by naming LJ. I love it.
|
Quote:
|
Let's see, the Chiefs have a Pro Bowler and one of the best backs in the NFL in LJ and a 2003 Pro Bowler in Michael Bennett. Both RB's cannot get going, both get hit as soon as they touch the ball and both have no holes to run through:
Bennett 18 Att, 49 yards in 5 games LJ 84 Att, 275 yards in 5 games I think the problem is the O-line, how can it be LJ? |
It's a combination of a bunch of bad elements.
1. The offensive linemen aren't currently suited to the running style Edwards wants to employ. 2. Larry Johnson isn't running with the same tenacity. 3. The playcalling in the earlygoing has been very predictable and has forced the Chiefs to have to deal with concentrated run defense efforts. |
Quote:
|
Pampers Johnson is 90% of the problem.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.