To add to what I said, regardless of who that first pick is, if Keith Rivers is at 17 you run up and take him it doesn't matter, he shouldn't be there at 17 I'd take him at 9 or 10 if I had one of those picks.

I love landing Rivers but it sucks that we seem to get screwed with the 5th pick. We need to just bite the bullet and draft Ellis

I think the Chiefs are high on tank and turk.

that sucks cock

I just want you to tell me how in the hell Cherilus is a better pick than Keith Rivers.

It's a better pick for the Chiefs. OT is a bigger need and at 17 I don't see Cherilus as a reach.

Keith Rivers is going to be a star pro bowl player.....I don't care what your need is.

i guess if you just imagine it was rivers then williams in your mind...not as bad..

but passing on ellis/gholston for williams, when you could get Baker or another tackle later, stings a little...

Then we should take Gholston.

and if we're hell bent on reaching for ol, better williams than clady, i think...

and we could trade down with baltimore if we wanted williams

jesus, i have no idea what we're going to do tomorrow....

I guess since he doesn't predict trades this might mean if he's right we're targeting Williams and will probably attempt to trade down and pick him.

Well yea, but it still looks bad when you realize you could have Gholston/Rivers and set that D for a long long time.

I know we need OL but to me the Chiefs get 2 of the top 8 players in the draft with Gholston/Rivers, if you can do that you worry about OL later.

it would almost be more plausible if the two were reversed

Or trade up from the #17 spot.