ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Royals Alright, let's settle this once and for all... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=187256)

Fish 07-14-2008 12:30 PM

The dark brown turd floats slightly more upright than the lighter-colored turd.....

DeezNutz 07-14-2008 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boris The Great (Post 4846094)
Royals record with John Buck catching:

33-32

Royals record with Miguel Olivo catching:

10-21

Thread over.

LMAO

KC is obviously a .500 club with Buck in the lineup. WTF Hillman?!? It's a statistic, so it must be accurate.

Regarding Buck vs. Olivo, they're both equally below average, each in different ways. However, both could be the catcher on a winning team with other pieces in place.

beavis 07-14-2008 12:42 PM

They guy makes one bad play and we're calling for his head?

Reaper16 07-14-2008 12:46 PM

I don't know if they are below average. They seem pretty damn average compared to other starting catchers. Sure, they're below average for a theoretical benchmark of what a good MLB catcher should be... but the simple truth is that there are practically no good catchers in the majors.

BigRock 07-14-2008 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 4846099)
But how many of those Buck wins also included Olivo's bat in the lineup at DH?

Does it really matter? Even if you could make a case that Buck's wins benefitted from Olivo's bat at the DH spot, it's just going to highlight the fact that Olivo shouldn't be the one behind the plate. After all, Olivo's bat was in the lineup for 100% of his starts at catcher, and look at that record.

I honestly had no idea the split was that extreme.

DeezNutz 07-14-2008 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 4846159)
Sure, they're below average for a theoretical benchmark of what a good MLB catcher should be... but the simple truth is that there are practically no good catchers in the majors.

I can agree with this.

CHENZ A! 07-14-2008 12:52 PM

I'd be willing to take just about anyone other than Buck's sorry ass.

sedated 07-14-2008 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boris The Great (Post 4846094)
Royals record with John Buck catching:

33-32

Royals record with Miguel Olivo catching:

10-21

any way to find out the starting pitchers ERA with each catcher?

Mama Hip Rockets 07-14-2008 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boris The Great (Post 4846094)
Royals record with John Buck catching:

33-32

Royals record with Miguel Olivo catching:

10-21

Thread over.


the royals had a good record at the beginning of the year when dejesus was on the DL and gathright was playing. does that mean gathright is better than dejesus?

DeezNutz 07-14-2008 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 4846191)
any way to find out the starting pitchers ERA with each catcher?

Someone has posted this info. before. It's better with Buck, and, if I'm remembering correctly, by a pretty decent margin.

I posted Buck's defensive stats in yesterday's game thread. He ranks 8th in the AL.

Nightfyre 07-14-2008 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boris The Great (Post 4846094)
Royals record with John Buck catching:

33-32

Royals record with Miguel Olivo catching:

10-21

Thread over.

Buck gets better pitchers by far is what that statistic speaks to, imo. I think Buck is the better catcher but Olivo is the better hitter. I think that's Hillman's take as well.

Mr. Arrowhead 07-14-2008 02:33 PM

stats dont lie especially in baseball, olivo is 100 times better than worthless buck

Reaper16 07-14-2008 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Arrowhead (Post 4846491)
stats dont lie especially in baseball, olivo is 100 times better than worthless buck

And which are the stats that show that?

Boris The Great 07-14-2008 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thurman merman (Post 4846228)
the royals had a good record at the beginning of the year when dejesus was on the DL and gathright was playing. does that mean gathright is better than dejesus?

I assumed that everyone understood the basic tenant of baseball that catchers are somewhat more important to the overall performance of a team than utility outfielders are. I was clearly wrong to assume this, and I apologize for the mistake.

Mr. Arrowhead 07-14-2008 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 4846496)
And which are the stats that show that?

olivo has thrown out 9 runners out of 19, when buck has thrown out 5 out of 38. Also olivo has almost twice as many HRs, more RBi's, and a better batting avg.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.