ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs What Clark has created by NOT firing Herm immediately... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=199392)

smittysbar 12-30-2008 02:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5339290)
Right Tackle, Right Guard, Center, DE, MLB, OLB, WR.

Sounds about right to me.

Can you not count.

Herm:
Quote:

“On defense, I think three (players), four maybe,” Edwards said, when asked how many new starters the Chiefs need. “On offense, you probably need two and then you’re pretty good. The rest of the team is going to be back, 85 percent of these kids are going to come back and they’re going to have experience.
Offense 2: you list 4 (which is not 2) how about QB (5) RB (6)
Defense 3 maybe 4: you got that correct, though is one guy on the worst Defensive line in NFL history going to fix it...Doubtful. And is one LB going to fix that, and how about safety?

The only way we are six players away is if they bring in the best six players on the team........NOT GOING TO HAPPEN

DaneMcCloud 12-30-2008 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smittysbar (Post 5339448)
Can you not count.

Herm:
Offense 2: you list 4 (which is not 2) how about QB (5) RB (6)
Defense 3 maybe 4: you got that correct, though is one guy on the worst Defensive line in NFL history going to fix it...Doubtful. And is one LB going to fix that, and how about safety?

The only way we are six players away is if they bring in the best six players on the team........NOT GOING TO HAPPEN

If Herm thinks that Richardson or Taylor is going to start at right tackle and possibly, both starting at right tackle and right guard respectively, then maybe he's right. That would only leave the Center position and a running back/QB.

To be honest (and I've stated this before), I have NO IDEA where Herm's getting his numbers. I don't know if he's referring to starters or if he's referring to the entire roster.

I guess the reporters should have asked him to clarify but once again, they failed to do so.

I blame Claythan.

smittysbar 12-30-2008 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5339457)
If Herm thinks that Richardson or Taylor is going to start at right tackle and possibly, both starting at right tackle and right guard respectively, then maybe he's right. That would only leave the Center position and a running back/QB.

To be honest (and I've stated this before), I have NO IDEA where Herm's getting his numbers. I don't know if he's referring to starters or if he's referring to the entire roster.

I guess the reporters should have asked him to clarify but once again, they failed to do so.

I blame Claythan.

It has to be starters, because six players away, would have to be six players better than anyone on this roster, to come here, which would make them starters.

Hammock Parties 12-30-2008 02:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5339457)

I guess the reporters should have asked him to clarify but once again, they failed to do so.

He would have just given some vague bullshit answer or acted all arrogant about not wanting to let other teams' know their draft strategies.

But he is completely delusional for thinking this team is that close.

Of course he wants all the wonderdummies back on the coaching staff.

Whee!!

DaneMcCloud 12-30-2008 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5339473)
He would have just given some vague bullshit answer or acted all arrogant about not wanting to let other teams' know their draft strategies.

But he is completely delusional for thinking this team is that close.

Of course he wants all the wonderdummies back on the coaching staff.

Whee!!

Regardless, the question should have been asked.

To think otherwise is either lazy or stupid.

And I'm not implying that you're either.

smittysbar 12-30-2008 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5339476)
Regardless, the question should have been asked.

To think otherwise is either lazy or stupid.

And I'm not implying that you're either.

I agree, and the guys on 810 were basically saying the same thing in a round about way, trying not to make Petro look bad.

007 12-30-2008 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smittysbar (Post 5339482)
I agree, and the guys on 810 were basically saying the same thing in a round about way, trying not to make Petro look bad.

That has to be hard.

lazepoo 12-30-2008 06:24 AM

The talent that's already on our roster needs to be coached up... frankly we were in a lot of games this year despite our glaring shortcomings and with some additions in FA and the draft (probably around 10-12 starters and rotational guys combined) this team can be a lot better than they were this year. I don't think it will happen with Herm, and I hope he's gone after we hire a new GM, but our cupboard isn't as bare as some would like to think it is.

beach tribe 12-30-2008 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5339290)
Right Tackle, Right Guard, Center, DE, MLB, OLB, WR.

Sounds about right to me.

Unless you add QB to that list, you're looking at 8-8. YAAAAAY!!!.

The Bad Guy 12-30-2008 08:27 AM

Anyone who thinks Herm Edwards is a good coach is ****ing dillusional.

I just don't understand how you can say a guy is a good HC when he has won just 2 games out of his last 25. He has a 15-33 record here. The defense he was fixing is at the bottom of the league.

I just don't know where the label of "good" is coming from.

Have our standards been neutered so bad that a coach that isn't good in any area is considered good? I'm just massively confused at the thought process.

crazycoffey 12-30-2008 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88 (Post 5339322)

List 5 examples of how Herm Edwards has been a "good head coach" with the Kansas City Chiefs.


http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=252

crazycoffey 12-30-2008 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5339633)
I just don't understand how you can say a guy is a good HC when he has won just 2 games out of his last 25. He has a 15-33 record here. The defense he was fixing is at the bottom of the league.

I just don't know where the label of "good" is coming from.


can we just stop with the name calling and how I must be stupid because I too believe Herm has done a good job, with what he had, what he's finally getting accomplished?

I view it from a more internal success, I see the games and see the improvements being made. I see that it's not just about the win loss record for saying what I say.

Dylan 12-30-2008 09:26 AM

Quote:

“I’m not one to try and build cases,” Edwards said. “I let my work speak for itself, and that’s the bottom line. I’m not big on promoting Herman Edwards. I never have been, and I’m not going to start now...."
Hasn't he been doing that his entire career -- Promoting himself, and tearing down the people around him? Just saying. ...

He's a goner. There is too much money at stake.

When does the new stadium open?

Bugeater 12-30-2008 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dylan (Post 5339751)
Hasn't he been doing that his entire career? Promoting himself, while he's trashing tearing everybody around him down -- Just saying. ...

He's a goner. There is too much money at stake. When does the new stadium open?

It's not a new stadium, they're just renovating the old one. I think it's supposed to be done in 2010.

Hoover 12-30-2008 09:29 AM

News Flash. There was going to be uncertainty even if Herm was fired yesterday. These guys are professionals, trust me they will deal with it. And to be honest, we all know that many of the players like Herm, so maybe its good that we didn't shit can him yesterday so we don't have to hear how great Herm was. Plus, the players need to respect the new GM, letting him fire Herm should send a clear message.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.