ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 5 1 2 345
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs If not Shanahan.. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=201028)

Rausch 01-24-2009 01:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 5422770)
I don't know, if Warner can play like this under Haley for a year or two, this might be a chance for us to develop a QBOTF.
Exactly. Best route to go imo.

Look at the Titans, Cardinals, Packers, Steelers, etc.

Sign the vet, draft the rookie, and you've covered all the bases. If the rook is ready you start him and have a solid 3-4 game b/u. If he's not ready you have a guy to keep the team floating until he is.

It's not either build for the future or win now, it's doing both...

Frankie 01-24-2009 01:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5422751)
Now, that is not a bad idea.

Stafford/Sanchez learning from Warner could work.
Either one of those would want to start right away. I think the Warner scenario fits getting someone like Freeman and developing him.

the Talking Can 01-24-2009 01:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 5422783)
Either one of those would want to start right away. I think the Warner scenario fits getting someone like Freeman and developing him.
who cares what they want...

Frankie 01-24-2009 01:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sparkky (Post 5422752)
I absolutely cannot see that happening and wouldn't be a happy camper if it did.
One of the youngest teams in the NFL doesn't need one of the oldest QB's in the NFL.
On the contrary, one of the youngest teams with some talent could benefit from an experienced pilot.

Frankie 01-24-2009 01:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5422776)
yes

as long as we draft a QB, otherwise we're just cheating the rebuild and in two years we still won't have a QB....
that would HAVE to be part of the scenario. I agree.

beach tribe 01-24-2009 01:22 PM
This guy obviously doesn't know shit about Clark, or Pioli.

DeezNutz 01-24-2009 01:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5422787)
who cares what they want...
We have to care.

Otherwise Pioli would be mean. And that would be wrong.

Frankie 01-24-2009 01:23 PM
I'm seeing mixed reactions here. But let me ask you, will you be watching the Senior Ball with extra attention on the QBs?

sparkky 01-24-2009 01:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5422755)
That was my initial reaction, but Rausch makes a good point.
it is a valid point but I doubt Warner can offer any more "knowledge" than Huard could. Warner is just a better passer.

I don't have a problem with a qb pick, just the waste of $$ it would take to get him here. And why would he even consider coming here? He'd be crazy to leave the Cards and the Vikes could use a qb and are a lot closer to competing than we are.

We couldn't compete next year if God was the head coach, Christ was the OC, the devil at DC and mother mary the trainer.

Frankie 01-24-2009 01:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 5422798)
This guy obviously doesn't know shit about Clark, or Pioli.
We really don't know that much either.

beach tribe 01-24-2009 01:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5422787)
who cares what they want...
For real. Who gives a shit what they want? STFU, hold the clip board, and pay the **** attention.

beach tribe 01-24-2009 01:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 5422805)
We really don't know that much either.
I know that Clark wants a young franchise QB, and that Edwards leaving doesn't change that.

beach tribe 01-24-2009 01:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sparkky (Post 5422804)
it is a valid point but I doubt Warner can offer any more "knowledge" than Huard could. Warner is just a better passer.

I don't have a problem with a qb pick, just the waste of $$ it would take to get him here. And why would he even consider coming here? He'd be crazy to leave the Cards and the Vikes could use a qb and are a lot closer to competing than we are.

We couldn't compete next year if God was the head coach, Christ was the OC, the devil at DC and mother mary the trainer.
Yeah, now that I think of it, why the hell would Warner want anything to do with a rebuild in the twilight of his career.

Rausch 01-24-2009 01:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sparkky (Post 5422804)
We couldn't compete next year if God was the head coach, Christ was the OC, the devil at DC and mother mary the trainer.
We were competitive this year with dog$#it at HC and DC.

Our problem wasn't being in games or having a chance to win, it was finishing. It was winning the ****ing game...

Dayze 01-24-2009 01:31 PM
if he comes to KC, and we draft a #1 QB etc; will the draftee start? or will Warner?

Either way, whoever starts will be dead by week 6.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:11 PM.
Page 2 of 5 1 2 345
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.