ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   First Round Pick (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=202143)

TommyHawk69 02-10-2009 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5477096)
Well we have our ACC homer on the board.

Who are you talkin about?

Mecca 02-10-2009 06:43 PM

OLB's are not worth top 5 picks.

RustShack 02-10-2009 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5477473)
OLB's are not worth top 5 picks.

Especially coverage LB's.

milkman 02-10-2009 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TommyHawk69 (Post 5477462)
Ok he is not the top senior prospect and after junoirs came out he only fell behind Crabtree.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5477473)
OLB's are not worth top 5 picks.

Exactly, and Crabtree is slow, played in the spread, and is not nearly as athletically gifted as Larry Fitzgerald or Calvin Johnson, so is not a top 5 prospect either.

philfree 02-10-2009 09:19 PM

Maybe in most drafts a LB wouldn't be a top five pick but in this draft because of the lack of top end talent there very well may be a LB top five pick. Never say always and never say never!

I hope Detroit drafts safe like Miami did last year and we get Stafford.


PhilFree:arrow:

OnTheWarpath15 02-10-2009 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 5477898)
Maybe in most drafts a LB wouldn't be a top five pick but in this draft because of the lack of top end talent there very well may be a LB top five pick. Never say always and never say never!

I hope Detroit drafts safe like Miami did last year and we get Stafford.


PhilFree:arrow:

What lack of top end talent?

Curry is behind both QB's, and all 3 OT's in my book. As well as Maualuga and Jenkins.

It looks like it's lacking in talent because we're not picking a tackle that high again, and 3 is too high for Maualuga as well.

So, just like Mecca said, Stafford, Sanchez and Jenkins are the only picks worth it to KC at 3.

philfree 02-10-2009 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5477906)
What lack of top end talent?

Curry is behind both QB's, and all 3 OT's in my book. As well as Maualuga and Jenkins.

It looks like it's lacking in talent because we're not picking a tackle that high again, and 3 is too high for Maualuga as well.

So, just like Mecca said, Stafford, Sanchez and Jenkins are the only picks worth it to KC at 3.


There are plenty of OTs in this draft that's for sure. I wouldn't be upset about drafting Jenkins even though I like our young CBs. Hell I wouldn't freak out if we drafted the best OT.

Still my want is Stafford.


PhilFree:arrow:

The Bad Guy 02-10-2009 09:48 PM

I will flip shit if the Chiefs take Malcolm Jenkins 3rd overall.

OnTheWarpath15 02-10-2009 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5477978)
I will flip shit if the Chiefs take Malcolm Jenkins 3rd overall.

I wouldn't be thrilled with it, but he's better value there than anyone else, assuming both QB's are off the board.

melbar 02-10-2009 10:02 PM

Sanchez either goes to us or late teens/20's in every draft. NFL Live was saying again that because of Ryan and Flacco teams are gonna reach for QB's who shouldnt be drafted so high.

Curry is a 5 star prospect on every evaluation I've seen thus far outside of the QB at all cost crowd on this BB. He's also being called the best LB prospect in years. I really think people are dogging him to bolster their QB at any cost argument.

DaneMcCloud 02-10-2009 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by melbar (Post 5478020)
Sanchez either goes to us or late teens/20's in every draft. NFL Live was saying again that because of Ryan and Flacco teams are gonna reach for QB's who shouldnt be drafted so high.

Curry is a 5 star prospect on every evaluation I've seen thus far outside of the QB at all cost crowd on this BB. He's also being called the best LB prospect in years. I really think people are dogging him to bolster their QB at any cost argument.

I think anyone with a brain wouldn't chose a cover linebacker with the number three overall pick.

Saccopoo 02-10-2009 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5477993)
I wouldn't be thrilled with it, but he's better value there than anyone else, assuming both QB's are off the board.

You want to take a player at a position, which, historically, is only successful 30% of the time? Cornerback is the most overrated position on the field bar none, and with the refs enforcing interference more, it would be a complete waste, especially considering that the Chiefs basically stole Flowers in the second in last years draft and Carr panned out as well as he did.

I want a QB in the worst way, specifically Stafford or Sanchez, but I'd most certainly take Curry over Jenkins at that spot if it came down to the two. And I would definitely take Monroe or Oher over anyone other than the two QB's previously mentioned at that spot.

And I suffered enough through the Kawika Mitchell years to even think about considering Maualuga. I'm pretty much done with overly aggressive "physical specimens" who over-pursue and basically take themselves out of 80% of the plays.

And there is something to be said about Curry being viable. Chiefs need a real LB in the worst way possible, and all the pundits think Curry is the real deal. Most say he is better than Pat Willis was, and I thought Willis kicked some serious ass for the Niners. I hope to the powers that be that we get one of the two QB's, but I wouldn't be kicking the dog if Curry ended up our guy.

OnTheWarpath15 02-10-2009 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5478221)
I think anyone with a brain wouldn't chose a cover linebacker with the number three overall pick.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5478321)
You want to take a player at a position, which, historically, is only successful 30% of the time? Cornerback is the most overrated position on the field bar none, and with the refs enforcing interference more, it would be a complete waste, especially considering that the Chiefs basically stole Flowers in the second in last years draft and Carr panned out as well as he did.

I want a QB in the worst way, specifically Stafford or Sanchez, but I'd most certainly take Curry over Jenkins at that spot if it came down to the two. And I would definitely take Monroe or Oher over anyone other than the two QB's previously mentioned at that spot.

And I suffered enough through the Kawika Mitchell years to even think about considering Maualuga. I'm pretty much done with overly aggressive "physical specimens" who over-pursue and basically take themselves out of 80% of the plays.

And there is something to be said about Curry being viable. Chiefs need a real LB in the worst way possible, and all the pundits think Curry is the real deal. Most say he is better than Pat Willis was, and I thought Willis kicked some serious ass for the Niners. I hope to the powers that be that we get one of the two QB's, but I wouldn't be kicking the dog if Curry ended up our guy.

.

Saccopoo 02-10-2009 11:40 PM

Stunning response OTW. You put a lot of thought into that one...

Ebolapox 02-10-2009 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5478360)
Stunning response OTW. You put a lot of thought into that one...

heh. sometimes the best material writes itself.

Exactly.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.