ChiefsPlanet - OK lets see it

Page 2 of 41

Last »

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)

- - OK lets see it (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=205472)

RustShack

04-06-2009 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 5645740)

I agree in the fact that Curry's highlight video's are less than impressive. If you put Curry's college highlight video up against a LB like Derrick Johnson's...It's not even close. But what you can see is Curry's ability to read plays and make plays. He doesn't have a ton of sacks, or multiple INT's returned for touchdowns. But his football smarts show through, and his ability to make routine plays LOOK ROUTINE is a big plus for me. KC's defense seems to have some players that lack fundamentals. I love Curry's ability to break down and truly form tackle.

Curry seems like an excellent player and person...and will really shine when he is allowed to run wild in Penderagast's scheme.

While this is true, that is not the type of player you draft #3. Also, he wouldn't be aloud to "run wild" in this defense.

Mecca

04-06-2009 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5645719)

I've also read somewhere that multiple scouts believe Jason Smith usually wouldn't even be top 10 talent.

If that's true then they'd hate most OT prospects in general then because he's very athletic, I think he's a far better prospect than Jake Long was.

chiefs1111

04-06-2009 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by svuba (Post 5645573)

You are right, all of the scouts are wrong.
Curry sucks, and everybody knows it.

It's not that he sucks. He's just not the player that some people are making him out too be. he is a good ,solid player,that's all.

milkman

04-06-2009 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5645834)

If that's true then they'd hate most OT prospects in general then because he's very athletic, I think he's a far better prospect than Jake Long was.

I think that both Smiths and Monroe are better prospects.

I also thought that Clady, Albert and Baker were all better last year.

KCrockaholic

04-06-2009 08:28 PM

Leave him alone, its his birthday! :p

TRR	04-06-2009 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5645777)

i can agree about making routine plays looks routine(and yeah we have lacked that on d), but at 3??? he should be making AWESOME plays look routine to be at 3

I knew this post was coming....

There are definitely enough spectacular plays in Curry's highlight reel to warrant him a #3. Especially for a team like KC who is very shorthanded on good LB's.

RustShack

04-06-2009 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 5646405)

I knew this post was coming....

There are definitely enough spectacular plays in Curry's highlight reel to warrant him a #3. Especially for a team like KC who is very shorthanded on good LB's.

So have you never seen Currys highlight reel? Or have you never see a real playmakers highlight reel?

TRR	04-06-2009 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5646493)

So have you never seen Currys highlight reel? Or have you never see a real playmakers highlight reel?

Lol!

Obviously you aren't a fan of drafting Curry at #3. I obviously am. There isn't a player at #3 that will make more of an impact than Curry in Pendergast's system. KC has to get some talented LB's to play the Defense that Haley, Pendergast, and Co. want the Chiefs to play.

Tribal Warfare

04-06-2009 09:48 PM

For Aaron Curry supporters, do you believe he'll make as big an impact on the game like LT or Derrick did? That's what type of shit I'm talking about is this player capable of changing the face of the game where teams fear that player alone.

RustShack

04-06-2009 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 5646532)

No no no there are players who CAN make a much bigger impact that Curry. There isn't a pick thats as SAFE or consistent as Curry. Safe and consistent in no way means a big impact. Also do you even know they system Pen runs? ILB's aren't very important...

melbar

04-06-2009 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 5645740)

I agree in the fact that Curry's highlight video's are less than impressive. If you put Curry's college highlight video up against a LB like Derrick Johnson's...It's not even close. But what you can see is Curry's ability to read plays and make plays. He doesn't have a ton of sacks, or multiple INT's returned for touchdowns. But his football smarts show through, and his ability to make routine plays LOOK ROUTINE is a big plus for me. KC's defense seems to have some players that lack fundamentals. I love Curry's ability to break down and truly form tackle.

Curry seems like an excellent player and person...and will really shine when he is allowed to run wild in Penderagast's scheme.

If I'm not mistaken he returned 3 last year over 60 yards for TD's.

melbar

04-07-2009 12:18 AM

http://video.msn.com/video.aspx?mkt=...b&from=&fg=rss

This one has a sack/fumble and an int...also some nice hits. He gets to the ball quickly. I think most plays seem to be going away from him to weaker players, still he gets to the play.

melbar

04-07-2009 12:27 AM

http://www.truveo.com/NFL-Draft-Line.../id/3375421440 The beginning of this LB highlight reel shows some nice hitting and Curry staying on his assignments to make the play.

melbar

04-07-2009 12:34 AM

This is one of the int's for TD. Check out the vid of week 9 against UNC on the left. He took over that game. Powerhouse that UNC is...http://wake.fandome.com/video/92092/...tions-for-Six/

Chiefnj2

04-07-2009 07:09 AM

Who are the defensive players that will make a much bigger impact than Curry? Who are the defensive players that are similar to LT and DT? Why aren't these players consistently ranked in the top 5 or top 10?

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:49 AM.

Page 2 of 41

Last »

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page