![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
As long as they don't draft Dirty Sanchez, I don't care who they draft.
|
If we can't trade out this is the best pick. Those who think taking another potential franchise tackle is a bad idea don't really understand football.
|
Quote:
I think making it where Branden Albert leaves when his 1st contract is up is a brilliant move that speaks to understanding football. |
Quote:
|
Are people blind or something. How can they not realize we already have our LT,we don't need to draft another one at number 3.
|
Quote:
|
blows my mind that people think we should move albert...and spend consecutive first round picks on LT...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It's a lot of money to invest in bookends for the next decade. I can see Pioli doin' it....IF, and it's a mighty big "if" cause I think there's a market for the Number 3 overall pick....IF they can't trade-down in the first.
If they trade-down in the first round, I can see them STILL drafting a RT or C to solidify the O-Line, though it wouldn't be a given... :hmmm: |
You aren't solidifying bookends for the next decade, you're doing it through the remainder of Branden Albert's contract, if Monroe works out. Once Albert is done, he's gonna go somewhere that sees him as a LT and he'll get LT money.
We can't give that to two players on their second contracts. |
I was actually on board with this plan a month or so ago, but Chiefsplanet talked me out of it. Now my board looks something like this:
1. Sanchez 2. Stafford 3. Orakpo (screw all of you who hate this) 4. Raji 5. Ev. Brown 6. Curry |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.