ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Gosselin's Top 100 prospects (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=206434)

milkman 04-23-2009 05:37 PM

Let me bottom line it for you.

If we can't trade down, we're ****ed.

MoreLemonPledge 04-23-2009 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 5699189)
Who was it that was saying no scouts had Crabtree as a top 10 talent or something? I don't remember what thread it was.

http://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthrea...=206418&page=2

Post 24. I remember that one specifically.

Mecca 04-23-2009 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5699209)
There are some people on this board that feels that Everette Brown is worth the 3rd pick.

Justin Tuck went in the 50's.

buddha 04-23-2009 05:56 PM

That paragraph that Goose wrote about this guy or that guy from last year's draft being better than the best at each position of this draft is complete bullshit. Easy to cherry pick once you KNOW how they are going to turn out, isn't it? That doesn't make the 2008 draft any better than the 2009 draft. It just makes it more of a known commodity. Talk about twisted logic!???

I don't worship Goose like a lot of guys on this board. He's just another writer with his own opinions.

Tribal Warfare 04-23-2009 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddha (Post 5699307)
I don't worship Goose like a lot of guys on this board. He's just another writer with his own opinions.

Like I said he's just conveying the collective opinion of scouts/front office personnel

MoreLemonPledge 04-23-2009 06:04 PM

Contradiction...

In his Top 100, he has Crabtree #2. However, in his most recent mock draft he has Jason Smith falling to us and says "Best player available at any position upgrades the Chiefs". Crabtree is still available and goes to the Browns at #5.

What?

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont....e3cc4cc9.html

keg in kc 04-23-2009 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddha (Post 5699307)
That paragraph that Goose wrote about this guy or that guy from last year's draft being better than the best at each position of this draft is complete bullshit. Easy to cherry pick once you KNOW how they are going to turn out, isn't it? That doesn't make the 2008 draft any better than the 2009 draft. It just makes it more of a known commodity. Talk about twisted logic!???

That wasn't the point he was making. What he's saying is that those players at this time last year were all rated higher than any of the players in this draft.

And they were. This class is not strong at all.

Chiefnj2 04-23-2009 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddha (Post 5699307)
I don't worship Goose like a lot of guys on this board. He's just another writer with his own opinions.

His opinions are usually based on his interviews with actual scouts and personnel guys. That's why his mocks are usually accurate.

Brock 04-23-2009 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5699715)
His opinions are usually based on his interviews with actual scouts and personnel guys. That's why his mocks are usually accurate.

His Saturday morning mocks are fairly accurate.

Mr. Krab 04-23-2009 08:28 PM

Going by Gosselins current mock we could get BJ Raji and Michael Oher if we trade down with the donks.

htismaqe 04-23-2009 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5699715)
His opinions are usually based on his interviews with actual scouts and personnel guys. That's why his mocks are usually accurate.

Very true.

His final mock draft is the most accurate out there.

However, it should be noted that his "inside" information, the stuff that makes his final mock so good, doesn't factor into his Top 100 rankings. His Top 100 rankings are good, but not nearly as good as his final mock.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-24-2009 01:12 AM

Also, his overall accuracy should be weighed against his accuracy in predicting New England's picks.

Additionally, Jerod Mayo was not the highest rated LB in the draft last year, that was Keith Rivers.

BryanBusby 04-24-2009 03:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5699117)
If he really thinks Long is a better OT prospect...he's ****ing nuts.

Jake Long definitely doesn't have as high of of a ceiling as some prospects like Jason Smith, but he was definitely was very polished as a prospect going into the draft last year.

Skyy God 04-24-2009 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MoreLemonPledge (Post 5699337)
Contradiction...

In his Top 100, he has Crabtree #2. However, in his most recent mock draft he has Jason Smith falling to us and says "Best player available at any position upgrades the Chiefs". Crabtree is still available and goes to the Browns at #5.

What?

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont....e3cc4cc9.html

It's a needs draft.... his first mock was BPA.

MoreLemonPledge 04-24-2009 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pittsie (Post 5700990)
It's a needs draft.... his first mock was BPA.

I know, it's the wording that threw me off.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.