![]() |
That's a damn good analysis. A lot of truth in that article
|
Quote:
|
Interesting.
|
If its a financial issue, then why don't the Chiefs just let their time run out, and let a few teams pick ahead of them?
If they really want Raji or Crabtree they could probably snag them at #6 no problem. Let the Seahawks, Browns, and Raiders go ahead of you. You won't get any compensation, but you also wont have to pay a ridiculous contract to an unworthy player. |
qlwekjrq;lkejr.
|
Quote:
FAX |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Chiefs are in a ****ed up spot here. Nobody they pick at #3 is worth #3 money. They stall, pick sixth, they pay sixth pick money. Philip Rivers was selected #4 overall by the Giants, he sat out because he wanted #1 money (even though Eli Manning was taken #1). In the end, he got #4 money. |
"At least we don't have to take a risk with Matt Cassel. We're getting a proven commodity."
Remember that line? How did that go? All we did was STILL take a risk on an unproven guy (Cassel is unproven, yes. One season does not a QB make) AND further our risk at #3 overall by not drafting a QB. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Do you know what year that was? |
Quote:
To be honest, I had forgotten all about Germ Warfare. We should be throwing you peeps a triumphus - complete with elephants and Herm's head on a stick. Nevertheless, were it not for that dumbass, we'd probably be picking in the mid first range instead of the damn 3 spot. Anyhow, we don't know how Cassel will turn out. He may work out fine. And don't forget, it's not a complete fantasy to imagine the Chiefs picking a QB if we can't find a trading partner. Don't give up hope until the last fig is fugged. FAX |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.