I would think if Alex Smith could get picked first in that draft than there is no reason to think that either of the big two qb's won't get picked pretty high

The author of this mock is either one dumb sum bitch or is just mocking the whole process.

I personally don't see the problem with it, relative to the other mocks that have us taking Okung.

Either way, we'd be drafting a RT.

ROFL

i love the anti offensive lineman movement that has been nurtured and pushed along on this board.

They have even have all the n00bs so worked up about offensive lineman being bad that mock drafts are now rated about how bad they are by how many Olineman are taken in the 1st.

It's some seriously stupid shit.

Seriously stupid shit are dumb mother****ers like you whose only source of entertainment is to revel in the ****ing stupidity of mock drafts like the one above.

You exist on this board for no other reason than to offer an opinion that is the antithesis of those you don't like, not because you find flaws in said opinion, but because you are so personally obsessed with them that their very thoughts shape yours.

It's pathetic.

Let's simplify things with a few new lexicon entries. For purposes of the 2010 draft:

"Great Mock" = any mock that has KC taking Berry.
"Not a bad mock" = any mock that has KC taking Clausen or McClain.
"Bad mock" = any mock that has KC taking an OL or Bradford.

apparently

Damn.... do they even try......?

I have been berated for promoting taking Oline in the past (I was fine with drafting Monroe and moving Albert inside where he had played next to him for 3 years .. I am firmly of the belief that no amount of talent can replace OL chemistry).. I am definitely a pro OL guy, but not when there are bigger needs and better values... Hell, I would even be ok with it (not excited but ok) if there was a stud LT that I could get behind but there simply isn't. Okung may end up an amazing LT but he has shown me NOTHING that indicates that so far...

Shut up n00b.