I'm sure you've explained this many times, but why would the Chiefs not be interested in Berry?

BTW - Why would we take a blah RB in the 1st when we could get one in the 5th?

The Vikings are taking a LB or a CB, depends what's there.

Just don't see it, Pioli's history says he values big fat bodies with his high picks and it's a deep safety class on top of it.

Sunk costs lead to bad decisions.

Hence the expression, "throwing good money after bad".

If he drafts Okung, I'll keep my signature as "Mother**** You, Scott Pioli" until his ass is fired in 2028.

I don't like it either but I think it's pretty likely at this point.

Okung threw up an awesome workout and came in at the precise size and had the arm length, and on top of that McClain isn't a clean prospect, all signs as of now pointing to Okung.

I see Pioli trading up to #1 overall, taking Cody then having Crennel swich to a 4-3 just to **** with you guys.

I know you are only speculating on the likelihood of it happening.

Still, it's infuriating to think that after 20 years of Carl, we get rewarded with Bill Belichick's dingleberries.

Spoon to the Vikes? Ugh, that would make that D even better. It's alright, I have him going to the Eagles.

Dez Bryant might be Buffalo's pick despite their need for O Line help.
(Man that'd piss off Denver)

If you switched Benn and Bryant's conferences, people's attitudes on this site would flip with it.

As the young people said last year "True that"

The Eagles don't value that position, they always have no name LB's and never use high picks on it.

The easiest way to get an Eagles pick right, give them a lineman.

Here's another ?:

If St. Louis drafts a QB in the first, that will mean that we've gone longer w/o drafting a 1st round QB than any team but the Saints.

Also, if we pass, we will have had 3 straight top 5 selections and never once spent one on a QB